Wafaa Ibrahim Ibrahim, Ahmed Ashraf, Dina Mohamed Elawady
{"title":"单种植体覆盖义齿的三维打印/增材制造。随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Wafaa Ibrahim Ibrahim, Ahmed Ashraf, Dina Mohamed Elawady","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b4870843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Mandibular single-implant overdenture is a well-established treatment modality for the management of completely edentulous patients. The use of CAD/CAM printing technology to fabricate complete dentures and overdentures is burgeoning. The present randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) aimed to clinically evaluate 3D-printed single-implant overdentures and compare their outcomes with those of overdentures fabricated using conventional techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An RCT was designed. Twenty-eight participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Participants in the control group received conventionally fabricated single-implant overdentures, while those in the intervention group received digital light processing-printed single-implant overdentures. An evaluation was conducted to assess implant survival and success rates as well as overdenture survival and success, along with the measurement of maximum bite force (MBF) over a 1-year follow-up period. Data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis. Statistical significance was determined using a two-sided P value with a threshold of less than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D-printed group had higher implant survival (100%) and success (92.8%) rates compared with the conventional group (85.7% survival, 85.7% success). Overdenture survival and success rates were 100% in the 3D-printed group and 78.6% in the conventional group. Both groups showed a significant increase in MBF at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups (P 0.001). The 3D-printed group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in MBF compared with the conventional group (P 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>3D-printed mandibular single-implant overdentures may represent an alternative to conventionally fabricated ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"57-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D printing/additive manufacturing of single-implant overdentures. A randomized controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Wafaa Ibrahim Ibrahim, Ahmed Ashraf, Dina Mohamed Elawady\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.ijcd.b4870843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Mandibular single-implant overdenture is a well-established treatment modality for the management of completely edentulous patients. The use of CAD/CAM printing technology to fabricate complete dentures and overdentures is burgeoning. The present randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) aimed to clinically evaluate 3D-printed single-implant overdentures and compare their outcomes with those of overdentures fabricated using conventional techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An RCT was designed. Twenty-eight participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Participants in the control group received conventionally fabricated single-implant overdentures, while those in the intervention group received digital light processing-printed single-implant overdentures. An evaluation was conducted to assess implant survival and success rates as well as overdenture survival and success, along with the measurement of maximum bite force (MBF) over a 1-year follow-up period. Data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis. Statistical significance was determined using a two-sided P value with a threshold of less than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D-printed group had higher implant survival (100%) and success (92.8%) rates compared with the conventional group (85.7% survival, 85.7% success). Overdenture survival and success rates were 100% in the 3D-printed group and 78.6% in the conventional group. Both groups showed a significant increase in MBF at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups (P 0.001). The 3D-printed group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in MBF compared with the conventional group (P 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>3D-printed mandibular single-implant overdentures may represent an alternative to conventionally fabricated ones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"57-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b4870843\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b4870843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
3D printing/additive manufacturing of single-implant overdentures. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Aim: Mandibular single-implant overdenture is a well-established treatment modality for the management of completely edentulous patients. The use of CAD/CAM printing technology to fabricate complete dentures and overdentures is burgeoning. The present randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) aimed to clinically evaluate 3D-printed single-implant overdentures and compare their outcomes with those of overdentures fabricated using conventional techniques.
Materials and methods: An RCT was designed. Twenty-eight participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Participants in the control group received conventionally fabricated single-implant overdentures, while those in the intervention group received digital light processing-printed single-implant overdentures. An evaluation was conducted to assess implant survival and success rates as well as overdenture survival and success, along with the measurement of maximum bite force (MBF) over a 1-year follow-up period. Data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis. Statistical significance was determined using a two-sided P value with a threshold of less than 0.05.
Results: The 3D-printed group had higher implant survival (100%) and success (92.8%) rates compared with the conventional group (85.7% survival, 85.7% success). Overdenture survival and success rates were 100% in the 3D-printed group and 78.6% in the conventional group. Both groups showed a significant increase in MBF at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups (P 0.001). The 3D-printed group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in MBF compared with the conventional group (P 0.001).
Conclusions: 3D-printed mandibular single-implant overdentures may represent an alternative to conventionally fabricated ones.
期刊介绍：
This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
