非阵发性心房颤动的导管消融术。综述。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-15 DOI:10.5507/bp.2023.053
Sabri Hassouna, Pavel Osmancik
{"title":"非阵发性心房颤动的导管消融术。综述。","authors":"Sabri Hassouna, Pavel Osmancik","doi":"10.5507/bp.2023.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The higher mortality is due to the risk of heart failure and cardioembolic events. This in-depth review focuses on the strategies and efficacy of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The main medical databases were searched for contemporary studies on catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Catheter ablation is currently proven to be the most effective treatment for AF and consists of pulmonary vein isolation as the cornerstone plus additional ablations. In terms of SR maintenance, it is less effective in non-paroxysmal AF than in paroxysmal patients. but the clinical benefit in non-paroxysmal patients is substantially higher. Since pulmonary vein isolation is ineffective, a variety of techniques have been developed, e.g. linear ablations, ablation of complex atrial fractionated electrograms, etc. Another paradox consists in the technique of catheter ablation. Despite promising results in early observation studies, further randomized studies have not confirmed the initial enthusiasm. Recently, a new approach, pulsed-field ablation, appears promising. This is an in-depth summary of current technologies and techniques for the ablation of non-paroxysmal AF. We discuss the benefits, risks and implications in the treatment of patients with non-paroxysmal AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":55363,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A review.\",\"authors\":\"Sabri Hassouna, Pavel Osmancik\",\"doi\":\"10.5507/bp.2023.053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The higher mortality is due to the risk of heart failure and cardioembolic events. This in-depth review focuses on the strategies and efficacy of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The main medical databases were searched for contemporary studies on catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Catheter ablation is currently proven to be the most effective treatment for AF and consists of pulmonary vein isolation as the cornerstone plus additional ablations. In terms of SR maintenance, it is less effective in non-paroxysmal AF than in paroxysmal patients. but the clinical benefit in non-paroxysmal patients is substantially higher. Since pulmonary vein isolation is ineffective, a variety of techniques have been developed, e.g. linear ablations, ablation of complex atrial fractionated electrograms, etc. Another paradox consists in the technique of catheter ablation. Despite promising results in early observation studies, further randomized studies have not confirmed the initial enthusiasm. Recently, a new approach, pulsed-field ablation, appears promising. This is an in-depth summary of current technologies and techniques for the ablation of non-paroxysmal AF. We discuss the benefits, risks and implications in the treatment of patients with non-paroxysmal AF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2023.053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2023.053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心房颤动(房颤)是最常见的心律失常,与发病率和死亡率的增加有关。死亡率较高的原因是心力衰竭和心肌栓塞事件的风险。这篇深度综述主要探讨了非阵发性心房颤动导管消融的策略和疗效。我们在主要医学数据库中搜索了有关非阵发性房颤导管消融术的当代研究。导管消融术目前已被证明是治疗房颤最有效的方法,包括以肺静脉隔离为基础的消融术和其他消融术。就 SR 维持率而言,非阵发性房颤患者的疗效不如阵发性患者,但非阵发性患者的临床获益要高得多。由于肺静脉隔绝术效果不佳,人们开发了多种技术,如线性消融术、复杂心房分段电图消融术等。另一个矛盾在于导管消融技术。尽管早期的观察研究结果令人鼓舞,但进一步的随机研究并未证实最初的热情。最近,脉冲场消融这种新方法似乎大有可为。 本文深入总结了当前用于非阵发性房颤消融的技术和技巧。我们讨论了治疗非阵发性房颤患者的益处、风险和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The higher mortality is due to the risk of heart failure and cardioembolic events. This in-depth review focuses on the strategies and efficacy of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The main medical databases were searched for contemporary studies on catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Catheter ablation is currently proven to be the most effective treatment for AF and consists of pulmonary vein isolation as the cornerstone plus additional ablations. In terms of SR maintenance, it is less effective in non-paroxysmal AF than in paroxysmal patients. but the clinical benefit in non-paroxysmal patients is substantially higher. Since pulmonary vein isolation is ineffective, a variety of techniques have been developed, e.g. linear ablations, ablation of complex atrial fractionated electrograms, etc. Another paradox consists in the technique of catheter ablation. Despite promising results in early observation studies, further randomized studies have not confirmed the initial enthusiasm. Recently, a new approach, pulsed-field ablation, appears promising. This is an in-depth summary of current technologies and techniques for the ablation of non-paroxysmal AF. We discuss the benefits, risks and implications in the treatment of patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedical Papers is a journal of Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Olomouc, Czech Republic. It includes reviews and original articles reporting on basic and clinical research in medicine. Biomedical Papers is published as one volume per year in four issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信