研究缺血性皮瓣愈合的细胞和分子机制的标准化临床前手术动物模型方案。

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Edita Aksamitiene, Ryan N Heffelfinger, Jan B Hoek, Edmund deAzevedo Pribitkin
{"title":"研究缺血性皮瓣愈合的细胞和分子机制的标准化临床前手术动物模型方案。","authors":"Edita Aksamitiene, Ryan N Heffelfinger, Jan B Hoek, Edmund deAzevedo Pribitkin","doi":"10.1186/s12575-023-00227-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some of the most complex surgical interventions to treat trauma and cancer include the use of locoregional pedicled and free autologous tissue transfer flaps. While the techniques used for these reconstructive surgery procedures have improved over time, flap complications and even failure remain a significant clinical challenge. Animal models are useful in studying the pathophysiology of ischemic flaps, but when repeatability is a primary focus of a study, conventional in-vivo designs, where one randomized subset of animals serves as a treatment group while a second subset serves as a control, are at a disadvantage instigated by greater subject-to-subject variability. Our goal was to provide a step-by-step methodological protocol for creating an alternative standardized, more economical, and transferable pre-clinical animal research model of excisional full-thickness wound healing following a simulated autologous tissue transfer which includes the primary ischemia, reperfusion, and secondary ischemia events with the latter mimicking flap salvage procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unlike in the most frequently used classical unilateral McFarlane's caudally based dorsal random pattern skin flap model, in the herein described bilateral epigastric fasciocutaneous advancement flap (BEFAF) model, one flap heals under normal and a contralateral flap-under perturbed conditions or both flaps heal under conditions that vary by one within-subjects factor. We discuss the advantages and limitations of the proposed experimental approach and, as a part of model validation, provide the examples of its use in laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus) axial pattern flap healing studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This technically challenging but feasible reconstructive surgery model eliminates inter-subject variability, while concomitantly minimizing the number of animals needed to achieve adequate statistical power. BEFAFs may be used to investigate the spatiotemporal cellular and molecular responses to complex tissue injury, interventions simulating clinically relevant flap complications (e.g., vascular thrombosis) as well as prophylactic, therapeutic or surgical treatment (e.g., flap delay) strategies in the presence or absence of confounding risk factors (e.g., substance abuse, irradiation, diabetes) or favorable wound-healing promoting activities (e.g., exercise). Detailed visual instructions in BEFAF protocol may serve as an aid for teaching medical or academic researchers basic vascular microsurgery techniques that focus on precision, tremor management and magnification.</p>","PeriodicalId":8960,"journal":{"name":"Biological Procedures Online","volume":"26 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10792889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardized Pre-clinical Surgical Animal Model Protocol to Investigate the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Ischemic Flap Healing.\",\"authors\":\"Edita Aksamitiene, Ryan N Heffelfinger, Jan B Hoek, Edmund deAzevedo Pribitkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12575-023-00227-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some of the most complex surgical interventions to treat trauma and cancer include the use of locoregional pedicled and free autologous tissue transfer flaps. While the techniques used for these reconstructive surgery procedures have improved over time, flap complications and even failure remain a significant clinical challenge. Animal models are useful in studying the pathophysiology of ischemic flaps, but when repeatability is a primary focus of a study, conventional in-vivo designs, where one randomized subset of animals serves as a treatment group while a second subset serves as a control, are at a disadvantage instigated by greater subject-to-subject variability. Our goal was to provide a step-by-step methodological protocol for creating an alternative standardized, more economical, and transferable pre-clinical animal research model of excisional full-thickness wound healing following a simulated autologous tissue transfer which includes the primary ischemia, reperfusion, and secondary ischemia events with the latter mimicking flap salvage procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unlike in the most frequently used classical unilateral McFarlane's caudally based dorsal random pattern skin flap model, in the herein described bilateral epigastric fasciocutaneous advancement flap (BEFAF) model, one flap heals under normal and a contralateral flap-under perturbed conditions or both flaps heal under conditions that vary by one within-subjects factor. We discuss the advantages and limitations of the proposed experimental approach and, as a part of model validation, provide the examples of its use in laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus) axial pattern flap healing studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This technically challenging but feasible reconstructive surgery model eliminates inter-subject variability, while concomitantly minimizing the number of animals needed to achieve adequate statistical power. BEFAFs may be used to investigate the spatiotemporal cellular and molecular responses to complex tissue injury, interventions simulating clinically relevant flap complications (e.g., vascular thrombosis) as well as prophylactic, therapeutic or surgical treatment (e.g., flap delay) strategies in the presence or absence of confounding risk factors (e.g., substance abuse, irradiation, diabetes) or favorable wound-healing promoting activities (e.g., exercise). Detailed visual instructions in BEFAF protocol may serve as an aid for teaching medical or academic researchers basic vascular microsurgery techniques that focus on precision, tremor management and magnification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Procedures Online\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10792889/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Procedures Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-023-00227-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Procedures Online","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-023-00227-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:治疗创伤和癌症的一些最复杂的外科干预措施包括使用局部带蒂和游离自体组织转移皮瓣。随着时间的推移,这些重建手术的技术不断改进,但皮瓣并发症甚至失败仍是临床面临的重大挑战。动物模型有助于研究缺血性皮瓣的病理生理学,但当可重复性是研究的主要重点时,传统的体内设计(即一个随机动物子集作为治疗组,另一个子集作为对照组)会因受试者之间的变异性较大而处于劣势。我们的目标是提供一个循序渐进的方法方案,创建一个标准化、更经济、可转移的临床前动物研究模型,用于模拟自体组织转移后的切除全厚伤口愈合,包括原发性缺血、再灌注和继发性缺血事件,后者模拟皮瓣挽救程序:与最常用的经典单侧麦克法兰尾部背侧随机模式皮瓣模型不同,在本文描述的双侧上腹部筋膜皮推进瓣(BEFAF)模型中,一个皮瓣在正常条件下愈合,对侧皮瓣在受扰条件下愈合,或者两个皮瓣在受试者内因子不同的条件下愈合。我们讨论了所提议的实验方法的优势和局限性,并作为模型验证的一部分,提供了在实验室大鼠(Rattus norvegicus)轴向模式皮瓣愈合研究中使用该方法的实例:结论:这种技术上具有挑战性但可行的重建手术模型消除了受试者之间的变异性,同时最大限度地减少了达到足够统计能力所需的动物数量。BEFAFs 可用于研究复杂组织损伤的时空细胞和分子反应、模拟临床相关皮瓣并发症(如血管血栓)的干预措施以及预防、治疗或手术治疗(如皮瓣延迟)策略,无论是否存在混杂风险因素(如药物滥用、辐照、糖尿病)或促进伤口愈合的有利活动(如运动)。BEFAF 协议中的详细视觉指示可作为医学或学术研究人员教授基本血管显微外科技术的辅助工具,这些技术侧重于精确性、震颤管理和放大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standardized Pre-clinical Surgical Animal Model Protocol to Investigate the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Ischemic Flap Healing.

Background: Some of the most complex surgical interventions to treat trauma and cancer include the use of locoregional pedicled and free autologous tissue transfer flaps. While the techniques used for these reconstructive surgery procedures have improved over time, flap complications and even failure remain a significant clinical challenge. Animal models are useful in studying the pathophysiology of ischemic flaps, but when repeatability is a primary focus of a study, conventional in-vivo designs, where one randomized subset of animals serves as a treatment group while a second subset serves as a control, are at a disadvantage instigated by greater subject-to-subject variability. Our goal was to provide a step-by-step methodological protocol for creating an alternative standardized, more economical, and transferable pre-clinical animal research model of excisional full-thickness wound healing following a simulated autologous tissue transfer which includes the primary ischemia, reperfusion, and secondary ischemia events with the latter mimicking flap salvage procedure.

Results: Unlike in the most frequently used classical unilateral McFarlane's caudally based dorsal random pattern skin flap model, in the herein described bilateral epigastric fasciocutaneous advancement flap (BEFAF) model, one flap heals under normal and a contralateral flap-under perturbed conditions or both flaps heal under conditions that vary by one within-subjects factor. We discuss the advantages and limitations of the proposed experimental approach and, as a part of model validation, provide the examples of its use in laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus) axial pattern flap healing studies.

Conclusions: This technically challenging but feasible reconstructive surgery model eliminates inter-subject variability, while concomitantly minimizing the number of animals needed to achieve adequate statistical power. BEFAFs may be used to investigate the spatiotemporal cellular and molecular responses to complex tissue injury, interventions simulating clinically relevant flap complications (e.g., vascular thrombosis) as well as prophylactic, therapeutic or surgical treatment (e.g., flap delay) strategies in the presence or absence of confounding risk factors (e.g., substance abuse, irradiation, diabetes) or favorable wound-healing promoting activities (e.g., exercise). Detailed visual instructions in BEFAF protocol may serve as an aid for teaching medical or academic researchers basic vascular microsurgery techniques that focus on precision, tremor management and magnification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Procedures Online
Biological Procedures Online 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: iological Procedures Online publishes articles that improve access to techniques and methods in the medical and biological sciences. We are also interested in short but important research discoveries, such as new animal disease models. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Reports of new research techniques and applications of existing techniques Technical analyses of research techniques and published reports Validity analyses of research methods and approaches to judging the validity of research reports Application of common research methods Reviews of existing techniques Novel/important product information Biological Procedures Online places emphasis on multidisciplinary approaches that integrate methodologies from medicine, biology, chemistry, imaging, engineering, bioinformatics, computer science, and systems analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信