夹笼难题:在适应性研究中评估封闭方法和蚜虫基因型的相互作用。

IF 2.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Insect Science Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1111/1744-7917.13316
Laura Marcela Martinez-Chavez, Joe M Roberts, Alison J Karley, Bethan Shaw, Tom W Pope
{"title":"夹笼难题:在适应性研究中评估封闭方法和蚜虫基因型的相互作用。","authors":"Laura Marcela Martinez-Chavez, Joe M Roberts, Alison J Karley, Bethan Shaw, Tom W Pope","doi":"10.1111/1744-7917.13316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavior and fitness are important ecological traits frequently measured in insect bioassays. A common method to measure them in soft-bodied herbivorous insects involves confining individuals to plant leaves using clip cages. Although studies have previously highlighted the negative effects of clip cages on leaf physiology, little is known about the impact that using this confinement method has on insect fitness. The responses of different aphid genotypes/clones to different containment methods have not previously been investigated. Here we measured key fitness traits (intrinsic rate of natural increase, mean relative growth rate, time to reach reproductive adulthood and population doubling time) in the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae Thomas (Hemiptera: Aphididae), when confined to plants using two methods: (1) clip cages to confine aphids to individual strawberry leaves and (2) a mesh bag to confine aphids to whole strawberry plants. Our study identified a strong negative impact on all the measured aphid fitness traits when using clip cages instead of mesh bags. We also identified genotype-specific differences in response to confinement method, where clip cage confinement differentially affected the fitness of a given aphid genotype compared to the same genotype on whole plants. These results suggest that clip cage use should be carefully considered when experiments seek to quantify insect fitness and that whole plants should be used wherever possible. Given the prevalence of clip cage use in insect bioassays, our results highlight the need for caution when interpreting the existing literature as confinement method significantly impacts aphid fitness depending on their genotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":13618,"journal":{"name":"Insect Science","volume":" ","pages":"1591-1602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The clip cage conundrum: Assessing the interplay of confinement method and aphid genotype in fitness studies.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Marcela Martinez-Chavez, Joe M Roberts, Alison J Karley, Bethan Shaw, Tom W Pope\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-7917.13316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Behavior and fitness are important ecological traits frequently measured in insect bioassays. A common method to measure them in soft-bodied herbivorous insects involves confining individuals to plant leaves using clip cages. Although studies have previously highlighted the negative effects of clip cages on leaf physiology, little is known about the impact that using this confinement method has on insect fitness. The responses of different aphid genotypes/clones to different containment methods have not previously been investigated. Here we measured key fitness traits (intrinsic rate of natural increase, mean relative growth rate, time to reach reproductive adulthood and population doubling time) in the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae Thomas (Hemiptera: Aphididae), when confined to plants using two methods: (1) clip cages to confine aphids to individual strawberry leaves and (2) a mesh bag to confine aphids to whole strawberry plants. Our study identified a strong negative impact on all the measured aphid fitness traits when using clip cages instead of mesh bags. We also identified genotype-specific differences in response to confinement method, where clip cage confinement differentially affected the fitness of a given aphid genotype compared to the same genotype on whole plants. These results suggest that clip cage use should be carefully considered when experiments seek to quantify insect fitness and that whole plants should be used wherever possible. Given the prevalence of clip cage use in insect bioassays, our results highlight the need for caution when interpreting the existing literature as confinement method significantly impacts aphid fitness depending on their genotype.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insect Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1591-1602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insect Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13316\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行为和适应性是昆虫生物测定中经常测量的重要生态特征。测量软体食草昆虫行为和适应性的一种常用方法是使用夹笼将昆虫个体限制在植物叶片上。尽管以前的研究已经强调了夹笼对叶片生理的负面影响,但对这种限制方法对昆虫适应性的影响却知之甚少。不同的蚜虫基因型/克隆对不同封闭方法的反应以前还没有研究过。在这里,我们测量了马铃薯蚜虫(Macrosiphum euphorbiae Thomas,半翅目:蚜科)用两种方法将其限制在植物上时的主要适应性特征(内在自然增长率、平均相对生长率、达到繁殖期的时间和种群加倍时间):(1)用夹子笼将蚜虫限制在单个草莓叶片上;(2)用网袋将蚜虫限制在整个草莓植株上。我们的研究发现,使用夹笼而不是网袋会对所有测得的蚜虫适应性特征产生强烈的负面影响。我们还发现了特定基因型对封闭方法的反应差异,与整株植株上的相同基因型相比,夹笼封闭对特定蚜虫基因型的适应性有不同的影响。这些结果表明,当实验试图量化昆虫的适应性时,应仔细考虑夹笼的使用,并尽可能使用整株植物。鉴于昆虫生物测定中普遍使用夹笼,我们的结果突出表明在解释现有文献时需要谨慎,因为昆虫的基因型不同,封闭方法会对蚜虫的适应性产生显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The clip cage conundrum: Assessing the interplay of confinement method and aphid genotype in fitness studies.

The clip cage conundrum: Assessing the interplay of confinement method and aphid genotype in fitness studies.

Behavior and fitness are important ecological traits frequently measured in insect bioassays. A common method to measure them in soft-bodied herbivorous insects involves confining individuals to plant leaves using clip cages. Although studies have previously highlighted the negative effects of clip cages on leaf physiology, little is known about the impact that using this confinement method has on insect fitness. The responses of different aphid genotypes/clones to different containment methods have not previously been investigated. Here we measured key fitness traits (intrinsic rate of natural increase, mean relative growth rate, time to reach reproductive adulthood and population doubling time) in the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae Thomas (Hemiptera: Aphididae), when confined to plants using two methods: (1) clip cages to confine aphids to individual strawberry leaves and (2) a mesh bag to confine aphids to whole strawberry plants. Our study identified a strong negative impact on all the measured aphid fitness traits when using clip cages instead of mesh bags. We also identified genotype-specific differences in response to confinement method, where clip cage confinement differentially affected the fitness of a given aphid genotype compared to the same genotype on whole plants. These results suggest that clip cage use should be carefully considered when experiments seek to quantify insect fitness and that whole plants should be used wherever possible. Given the prevalence of clip cage use in insect bioassays, our results highlight the need for caution when interpreting the existing literature as confinement method significantly impacts aphid fitness depending on their genotype.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insect Science
Insect Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1379
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Insect Science is an English-language journal, which publishes original research articles dealing with all fields of research in into insects and other terrestrial arthropods. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: ecology, behavior, biogeography, physiology, biochemistry, sociobiology, phylogeny, pest management, and exotic incursions. The emphasis of the journal is on the adaptation and evolutionary biology of insects from the molecular to the ecosystem level. Reviews, mini reviews and letters to the editor, book reviews, and information about academic activities of the society are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信