比较从临床样本中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌的基因分型方法和毒素基因图谱。

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Genetics and Molecular Biology Pub Date : 2023-12-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2022-0321
Mariana Andrade-Figueiredo, Ana Carolina de Oliveira Luz, Vladimir da Mota Silveira Filho, Tereza Cristina Leal-Balbino
{"title":"比较从临床样本中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌的基因分型方法和毒素基因图谱。","authors":"Mariana Andrade-Figueiredo, Ana Carolina de Oliveira Luz, Vladimir da Mota Silveira Filho, Tereza Cristina Leal-Balbino","doi":"10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2022-0321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of infections worldwide. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is one of the main causes of Gram-positive infections, and methicillin-susceptible strains (MSSA) primarily colonize and infect community hosts. Multiple virulence factors are involved, with toxins playing a significant role in several diseases. In this study, we assess the prevalence of toxin genes in 89 S. aureus clinical isolates (31 MRSA and 58 MSSA). We evaluated the discriminatory power of the association of internal transcribed spacer-PCR (ITS-PCR) and 3'- end coa gene ( coa-PCR) when compared with other more commonly used and costly techniques. The isolates showed a high level of genetic diversity, and toxins were found in all the isolates. While most toxin classes displayed no statistically significant correlations and were equally distributed in isolates regardless of their resistance status, classic enterotoxins ( sea-see) showed a positive correlation with MSSA isolates. The combination of coa-PCR with ITS-PCR showed a discriminatory index of 0.84, discriminating 22 genotypes that agree with previously determined data by PFGE and MLST. This association between the two PCR-based methods suggests that they can be useful for an initial molecular epidemiological investigation of S. aureus in hospitals, providing significant information while requiring fewer resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":12557,"journal":{"name":"Genetics and Molecular Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of genotyping methods and toxin gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from clinical specimens.\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Andrade-Figueiredo, Ana Carolina de Oliveira Luz, Vladimir da Mota Silveira Filho, Tereza Cristina Leal-Balbino\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2022-0321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of infections worldwide. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is one of the main causes of Gram-positive infections, and methicillin-susceptible strains (MSSA) primarily colonize and infect community hosts. Multiple virulence factors are involved, with toxins playing a significant role in several diseases. In this study, we assess the prevalence of toxin genes in 89 S. aureus clinical isolates (31 MRSA and 58 MSSA). We evaluated the discriminatory power of the association of internal transcribed spacer-PCR (ITS-PCR) and 3'- end coa gene ( coa-PCR) when compared with other more commonly used and costly techniques. The isolates showed a high level of genetic diversity, and toxins were found in all the isolates. While most toxin classes displayed no statistically significant correlations and were equally distributed in isolates regardless of their resistance status, classic enterotoxins ( sea-see) showed a positive correlation with MSSA isolates. The combination of coa-PCR with ITS-PCR showed a discriminatory index of 0.84, discriminating 22 genotypes that agree with previously determined data by PFGE and MLST. This association between the two PCR-based methods suggests that they can be useful for an initial molecular epidemiological investigation of S. aureus in hospitals, providing significant information while requiring fewer resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2022-0321\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2022-0321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

金黄色葡萄球菌是全球感染的常见病因。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是革兰氏阳性感染的主要原因之一,而甲氧西林敏感菌株(MSSA)主要定植和感染社区宿主。其中涉及多种毒力因子,毒素在多种疾病中发挥着重要作用。在本研究中,我们评估了 89 株金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株(31 株 MRSA 和 58 株 MSSA)中毒素基因的流行情况。与其他更常用且成本更高的技术相比,我们评估了内部转录间隔-PCR(ITS-PCR)和 3'- end coa 基因(coa-PCR)关联的鉴别力。分离物显示出高度的遗传多样性,所有分离物中都发现了毒素。虽然大多数毒素类别在统计学上没有明显的相关性,而且无论抗药性状况如何,毒素在分离物中的分布都是相同的,但典型的肠毒素(海见毒素)与 MSSA 分离物呈正相关。联合 PCR 与 ITS-PCR 结合使用的鉴别指数为 0.84,可鉴别出 22 个基因型,这些基因型与之前通过 PFGE 和 MLST 确定的数据一致。这两种基于 PCR 的方法之间的关联表明,它们可用于医院金黄色葡萄球菌的初步分子流行病学调查,在提供重要信息的同时需要较少的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of genotyping methods and toxin gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from clinical specimens.

Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of infections worldwide. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is one of the main causes of Gram-positive infections, and methicillin-susceptible strains (MSSA) primarily colonize and infect community hosts. Multiple virulence factors are involved, with toxins playing a significant role in several diseases. In this study, we assess the prevalence of toxin genes in 89 S. aureus clinical isolates (31 MRSA and 58 MSSA). We evaluated the discriminatory power of the association of internal transcribed spacer-PCR (ITS-PCR) and 3'- end coa gene ( coa-PCR) when compared with other more commonly used and costly techniques. The isolates showed a high level of genetic diversity, and toxins were found in all the isolates. While most toxin classes displayed no statistically significant correlations and were equally distributed in isolates regardless of their resistance status, classic enterotoxins ( sea-see) showed a positive correlation with MSSA isolates. The combination of coa-PCR with ITS-PCR showed a discriminatory index of 0.84, discriminating 22 genotypes that agree with previously determined data by PFGE and MLST. This association between the two PCR-based methods suggests that they can be useful for an initial molecular epidemiological investigation of S. aureus in hospitals, providing significant information while requiring fewer resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics and Molecular Biology
Genetics and Molecular Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Genetics and Molecular Biology (formerly named Revista Brasileira de Genética/Brazilian Journal of Genetics - ISSN 0100-8455) is published by the Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (Brazilian Society of Genetics). The Journal considers contributions that present the results of original research in genetics, evolution and related scientific disciplines. Manuscripts presenting methods and applications only, without an analysis of genetic data, will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信