强制性体能要求对心血管事件的影响:利用全国数据库进行的逐州分析。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Workplace Health & Safety Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1177/21650799231221575
Dillon J Dzikowicz, Sankalp Babarao Saoji, Wai Cheong Tam, Wendy M Brunner, Mary G Carey
{"title":"强制性体能要求对心血管事件的影响:利用全国数据库进行的逐州分析。","authors":"Dillon J Dzikowicz, Sankalp Babarao Saoji, Wai Cheong Tam, Wendy M Brunner, Mary G Carey","doi":"10.1177/21650799231221575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular events are known to be the leading cause of death among on-duty firefighters. Implementing fitness standards may help reduce the incidence of cardiovascular deaths; however, standards vary between firefighter type and states. We aimed to investigate the rate of cardiovascular events among firefighters across states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using publicly available data from the United States Fire Administration, we explored the rates of cardiovascular deaths between firefighter type (e.g., career, volunteer, and wildland) and state. Specifically, we examined rates of cardiovascular deaths between California and Tennessee, which have fitness standards for all firefighters, and New York, which does not have fitness standards for volunteer firefighters. We used descriptive statistics and trend analysis to examine the data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Most cardiovascular events occur among volunteer firefighters (60.6%, <i>n</i> = 877). Volunteer firefighters had 7.5 (95% CI = [4.8, 11.7], <i>p</i> < .001) greater odds of cardiovascular events compared to wildland firefighters, who had the lowest incidence of cardiovascular events (1.7%, <i>n</i> = 24). New York reported the most cardiovascular events (<i>n</i> = 161), primarily among volunteer firefighters (73.9%, <i>n</i> = 119). After the passage of legislation mandating fitness standards in California, a downtrend in the number of volunteer firefighter fatalities is observed. However, a null effect was observed in Tennessee after the passage of similar fitness standards as in California.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/applications to practice: </strong>Volunteer firefighters are significantly more likely to die of a cardiovascular event than career and wildland firefighters, both of which have stricter fitness standards. However, the effect of legislation mandating stricter fitness standards among volunteers did not produce a clear benefit for preventing fatalities. Nurses need to promote cardiovascular health among volunteer firefighters.</p>","PeriodicalId":48968,"journal":{"name":"Workplace Health & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"101-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Mandatory Fitness Requirements on Cardiovascular Events: A State-by-State Analysis Using a National Database.\",\"authors\":\"Dillon J Dzikowicz, Sankalp Babarao Saoji, Wai Cheong Tam, Wendy M Brunner, Mary G Carey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21650799231221575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular events are known to be the leading cause of death among on-duty firefighters. Implementing fitness standards may help reduce the incidence of cardiovascular deaths; however, standards vary between firefighter type and states. We aimed to investigate the rate of cardiovascular events among firefighters across states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using publicly available data from the United States Fire Administration, we explored the rates of cardiovascular deaths between firefighter type (e.g., career, volunteer, and wildland) and state. Specifically, we examined rates of cardiovascular deaths between California and Tennessee, which have fitness standards for all firefighters, and New York, which does not have fitness standards for volunteer firefighters. We used descriptive statistics and trend analysis to examine the data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Most cardiovascular events occur among volunteer firefighters (60.6%, <i>n</i> = 877). Volunteer firefighters had 7.5 (95% CI = [4.8, 11.7], <i>p</i> < .001) greater odds of cardiovascular events compared to wildland firefighters, who had the lowest incidence of cardiovascular events (1.7%, <i>n</i> = 24). New York reported the most cardiovascular events (<i>n</i> = 161), primarily among volunteer firefighters (73.9%, <i>n</i> = 119). After the passage of legislation mandating fitness standards in California, a downtrend in the number of volunteer firefighter fatalities is observed. However, a null effect was observed in Tennessee after the passage of similar fitness standards as in California.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/applications to practice: </strong>Volunteer firefighters are significantly more likely to die of a cardiovascular event than career and wildland firefighters, both of which have stricter fitness standards. However, the effect of legislation mandating stricter fitness standards among volunteers did not produce a clear benefit for preventing fatalities. Nurses need to promote cardiovascular health among volunteer firefighters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workplace Health & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workplace Health & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799231221575\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799231221575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:众所周知,心血管事件是执勤消防员死亡的主要原因。实施体能标准可能有助于降低心血管死亡的发生率;然而,不同类型和不同州的消防员体能标准各不相同。我们旨在调查各州消防员的心血管事件发生率:我们利用美国消防局公开提供的数据,探讨了不同消防员类型(如职业消防员、志愿消防员和野外消防员)和不同州的心血管死亡率。具体来说,我们研究了加利福尼亚州和田纳西州与纽约州之间的心血管疾病死亡率,加利福尼亚州和田纳西州对所有消防员都有体能标准,而纽约州对志愿消防员没有体能标准。我们使用了描述性统计和趋势分析来研究数据:大多数心血管事件发生在志愿消防员中(60.6%,n = 877)。与心血管事件发生率最低(1.7%,n = 24)的野外消防员相比,志愿消防员发生心血管事件的几率要高出 7.5(95% CI = [4.8,11.7],p < .001)。纽约报告的心血管事件最多(n = 161),主要发生在志愿消防员中(73.9%,n = 119)。加利福尼亚州通过立法强制执行体能标准后,志愿消防员死亡人数呈下降趋势。然而,在田纳西州通过了与加利福尼亚州类似的体能标准后,却观察到了无效效应:志愿消防员死于心血管事件的几率明显高于职业消防员和野外消防员,而这两种消防员的体能标准都更为严格。然而,立法强制要求志愿消防员达到更严格的体能标准并没有对预防死亡产生明显的益处。护士需要促进志愿消防员的心血管健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Mandatory Fitness Requirements on Cardiovascular Events: A State-by-State Analysis Using a National Database.

Background: Cardiovascular events are known to be the leading cause of death among on-duty firefighters. Implementing fitness standards may help reduce the incidence of cardiovascular deaths; however, standards vary between firefighter type and states. We aimed to investigate the rate of cardiovascular events among firefighters across states.

Methods: Using publicly available data from the United States Fire Administration, we explored the rates of cardiovascular deaths between firefighter type (e.g., career, volunteer, and wildland) and state. Specifically, we examined rates of cardiovascular deaths between California and Tennessee, which have fitness standards for all firefighters, and New York, which does not have fitness standards for volunteer firefighters. We used descriptive statistics and trend analysis to examine the data.

Findings: Most cardiovascular events occur among volunteer firefighters (60.6%, n = 877). Volunteer firefighters had 7.5 (95% CI = [4.8, 11.7], p < .001) greater odds of cardiovascular events compared to wildland firefighters, who had the lowest incidence of cardiovascular events (1.7%, n = 24). New York reported the most cardiovascular events (n = 161), primarily among volunteer firefighters (73.9%, n = 119). After the passage of legislation mandating fitness standards in California, a downtrend in the number of volunteer firefighter fatalities is observed. However, a null effect was observed in Tennessee after the passage of similar fitness standards as in California.

Conclusions/applications to practice: Volunteer firefighters are significantly more likely to die of a cardiovascular event than career and wildland firefighters, both of which have stricter fitness standards. However, the effect of legislation mandating stricter fitness standards among volunteers did not produce a clear benefit for preventing fatalities. Nurses need to promote cardiovascular health among volunteer firefighters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Workplace Health & Safety: Promoting Environments Conducive to Well-Being and Productivity is the official publication of the American Association of Occupational Health Nursing, Inc. (AAOHN). It is a scientific peer-reviewed Journal. Its purpose is to support and promote the practice of occupational and environmental health nurses by providing leading edge research findings and evidence-based clinical practices. It publishes articles that span the range of issues facing occupational and environmental health professionals, including emergency and all-hazard preparedness, health promotion, safety, productivity, environmental health, case management, workers'' compensation, business and leadership, compliance and information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信