高甘油三酯血症-3诱发急性胰腺炎患者使用胰岛素与浆细胞分离疗法的疗效和不良反应:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-20 DOI:10.20524/aog.2023.0849
Shobhit Piplani, Arpit Jain, Kamaldeep Singh, Shreya Gulati, Salil Chaturvedi, Vishal Reddy Bejugam, Donclair Brown, Chisom Asuzu, Shiny Teja Kolli, Usman Shah, Jashan Reet, Milos Mihajlovic, Vladimir Jelic, Gavro Jelic, Rosalba Santana De Roberts, Dushyant Damania, Miroslav Radulovic
{"title":"高甘油三酯血症-3诱发急性胰腺炎患者使用胰岛素与浆细胞分离疗法的疗效和不良反应:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Shobhit Piplani, Arpit Jain, Kamaldeep Singh, Shreya Gulati, Salil Chaturvedi, Vishal Reddy Bejugam, Donclair Brown, Chisom Asuzu, Shiny Teja Kolli, Usman Shah, Jashan Reet, Milos Mihajlovic, Vladimir Jelic, Gavro Jelic, Rosalba Santana De Roberts, Dushyant Damania, Miroslav Radulovic","doi":"10.20524/aog.2023.0849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertriglyceridemia is a common cause of acute pancreatitis (AP). This literature review compared the effectiveness and adverse events of insulin therapy, with or without heparin, and plasmapheresis, in reducing triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia-induced AP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, evidence syntheses, editorials, commentaries, protocols, abstracts, theses and preprints were excluded. Review Manager was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The literature search yielded 2765 articles, but only 5 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis and the total number of participants in the review was 269.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From this study's analysis, insulin ± heparin was more successful in reducing triglyceride levels than plasmapheresis (standardized mean difference -0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99 to 0.25; P=0.25). Insulin ± heparin therapy had a lower mortality rate than plasmapheresis (risk ratio [RR] 0.70, 95%CI 0.25-1.95). Hypotension, hypoglycemia, and acute renal failure were less common in the plasmapheresis therapy group than in insulin ± heparin therapy (RR 1.13, 95%CI 0.46-2.81, RR 3.90, 95%CI 0.45-33.78, and RR 0.48, 95%CI 0.02-13.98 for hypotension, hypoglycemia, and acute renal failure, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found no significant difference in mortality between insulin ± heparin therapy and plasmapheresis used for the reduction in triglyceride levels. It is notable that no substantial differences were observed in the most common side-effects encountered during these therapies, thus indicating non-inferiority.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 1","pages":"109-116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and adverse effects of insulin versus plasmapheresis in patients with hypertriglyceridemia-3-induced acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shobhit Piplani, Arpit Jain, Kamaldeep Singh, Shreya Gulati, Salil Chaturvedi, Vishal Reddy Bejugam, Donclair Brown, Chisom Asuzu, Shiny Teja Kolli, Usman Shah, Jashan Reet, Milos Mihajlovic, Vladimir Jelic, Gavro Jelic, Rosalba Santana De Roberts, Dushyant Damania, Miroslav Radulovic\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2023.0849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertriglyceridemia is a common cause of acute pancreatitis (AP). This literature review compared the effectiveness and adverse events of insulin therapy, with or without heparin, and plasmapheresis, in reducing triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia-induced AP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, evidence syntheses, editorials, commentaries, protocols, abstracts, theses and preprints were excluded. Review Manager was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The literature search yielded 2765 articles, but only 5 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis and the total number of participants in the review was 269.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From this study's analysis, insulin ± heparin was more successful in reducing triglyceride levels than plasmapheresis (standardized mean difference -0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99 to 0.25; P=0.25). Insulin ± heparin therapy had a lower mortality rate than plasmapheresis (risk ratio [RR] 0.70, 95%CI 0.25-1.95). Hypotension, hypoglycemia, and acute renal failure were less common in the plasmapheresis therapy group than in insulin ± heparin therapy (RR 1.13, 95%CI 0.46-2.81, RR 3.90, 95%CI 0.45-33.78, and RR 0.48, 95%CI 0.02-13.98 for hypotension, hypoglycemia, and acute renal failure, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found no significant difference in mortality between insulin ± heparin therapy and plasmapheresis used for the reduction in triglyceride levels. It is notable that no substantial differences were observed in the most common side-effects encountered during these therapies, thus indicating non-inferiority.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"109-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785016/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2023.0849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2023.0849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高甘油三酯血症是急性胰腺炎(AP)的常见病因。本文献综述比较了胰岛素治疗(无论是否使用肝素)和血浆置换术在降低高甘油三酯血症诱发的急性胰腺炎患者甘油三酯水平方面的有效性和不良反应:排除系统综述、荟萃分析、证据综述、社论、评论、协议、摘要、论文和预印本。使用综述管理器进行荟萃分析。文献检索共获得 2765 篇文章,但只有 5 篇被纳入系统综述和荟萃分析,参与综述的总人数为 269 人:从该研究的分析结果来看,胰岛素±肝素疗法在降低甘油三酯水平方面比浆溶疗法更成功(标准化平均差异-0.37,95% 置信区间[CI] 0.99 至 0.25;P=0.25)。胰岛素和肝素疗法的死亡率低于血浆置换疗法(风险比 [RR] 0.70,95%CI 0.25-1.95)。与胰岛素±肝素疗法相比,血浆置换疗法组的低血压、低血糖和急性肾功能衰竭发生率较低(低血压、低血糖和急性肾功能衰竭的发生率分别为 RR 1.13,95%CI 0.46-2.81;RR 3.90,95%CI 0.45-33.78;RR 0.48,95%CI 0.02-13.98):本研究发现,胰岛素±肝素疗法和血浆置换疗法在降低甘油三酯水平方面的死亡率没有明显差异。值得注意的是,在这两种疗法中最常见的副作用方面也没有发现明显差异,因此表明这两种疗法并无优劣之分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and adverse effects of insulin versus plasmapheresis in patients with hypertriglyceridemia-3-induced acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Hypertriglyceridemia is a common cause of acute pancreatitis (AP). This literature review compared the effectiveness and adverse events of insulin therapy, with or without heparin, and plasmapheresis, in reducing triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia-induced AP.

Methods: Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, evidence syntheses, editorials, commentaries, protocols, abstracts, theses and preprints were excluded. Review Manager was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The literature search yielded 2765 articles, but only 5 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis and the total number of participants in the review was 269.

Results: From this study's analysis, insulin ± heparin was more successful in reducing triglyceride levels than plasmapheresis (standardized mean difference -0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99 to 0.25; P=0.25). Insulin ± heparin therapy had a lower mortality rate than plasmapheresis (risk ratio [RR] 0.70, 95%CI 0.25-1.95). Hypotension, hypoglycemia, and acute renal failure were less common in the plasmapheresis therapy group than in insulin ± heparin therapy (RR 1.13, 95%CI 0.46-2.81, RR 3.90, 95%CI 0.45-33.78, and RR 0.48, 95%CI 0.02-13.98 for hypotension, hypoglycemia, and acute renal failure, respectively).

Conclusions: This study found no significant difference in mortality between insulin ± heparin therapy and plasmapheresis used for the reduction in triglyceride levels. It is notable that no substantial differences were observed in the most common side-effects encountered during these therapies, thus indicating non-inferiority.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信