抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)再挑战在转移性结直肠癌中的作用--从现有数据到未来发展:系统综述

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Davide Ciardiello , Gianluca Mauri , Andrea Sartore-Bianchi , Salvatore Siena , Maria Giulia Zampino , Nicola Fazio , Andres Cervantes
{"title":"抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)再挑战在转移性结直肠癌中的作用--从现有数据到未来发展:系统综述","authors":"Davide Ciardiello ,&nbsp;Gianluca Mauri ,&nbsp;Andrea Sartore-Bianchi ,&nbsp;Salvatore Siena ,&nbsp;Maria Giulia Zampino ,&nbsp;Nicola Fazio ,&nbsp;Andres Cervantes","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite recent molecular and immunological advancements, prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients remains poor. In this context, several retrospective and phase II studies suggested that after failure of an upfront anti-EGFR based regimen, a subset of patients can still benefit from further anti-EGFR blockade.</p><p>Several translational studies involving circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis demonstrated that cancer clones harboring mutations driving anti-EGFR resistance, which can arise under anti-EGFR agents selective pressure, often decay after anti-EGFR discontinuation potentially restoring sensitivity to this therapeutic strategy. Accordingly, several retrospective analyses and a recent prospective trial demonstrated that ctDNA <em>RAS</em> and <em>BRAF</em> wild-type mCRC patients are those benefitting the most from anti-EGFR rechallenge. Indeed, in molecularly selected patients, anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy achieved up to 30 % response rate, with a progression free survival longer than 4 months and an overall survival longer than 1 year, which favorably compared with other standard therapeutic options available for heavily pretreated patients. Anti-EGFR is also well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities compared to the upfront setting. However, several open questions remain to be addressed towards a broader applicability of anti-EGFR strategy in the everyday clinical practice such as the identification of the best rechallenge regimen, the right placement in mCRC therapeutic algorithm, the best ctDNA screening panel.</p><p>In our systematic review, we revised available data from clinical trials assessing anti-EGFR rechallenge activity in chemo-refractory mCRC patients, discussing as well potential future scenarios and development to implement this therapeutic approach. Particularly, we discussed the role of ctDNA as a safe, timely and comprehensive tool to refine patient’s selection and the therapeutic index of anti-EGFR rechallenge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of anti-EGFR rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer, from available data to future developments: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Davide Ciardiello ,&nbsp;Gianluca Mauri ,&nbsp;Andrea Sartore-Bianchi ,&nbsp;Salvatore Siena ,&nbsp;Maria Giulia Zampino ,&nbsp;Nicola Fazio ,&nbsp;Andres Cervantes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite recent molecular and immunological advancements, prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients remains poor. In this context, several retrospective and phase II studies suggested that after failure of an upfront anti-EGFR based regimen, a subset of patients can still benefit from further anti-EGFR blockade.</p><p>Several translational studies involving circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis demonstrated that cancer clones harboring mutations driving anti-EGFR resistance, which can arise under anti-EGFR agents selective pressure, often decay after anti-EGFR discontinuation potentially restoring sensitivity to this therapeutic strategy. Accordingly, several retrospective analyses and a recent prospective trial demonstrated that ctDNA <em>RAS</em> and <em>BRAF</em> wild-type mCRC patients are those benefitting the most from anti-EGFR rechallenge. Indeed, in molecularly selected patients, anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy achieved up to 30 % response rate, with a progression free survival longer than 4 months and an overall survival longer than 1 year, which favorably compared with other standard therapeutic options available for heavily pretreated patients. Anti-EGFR is also well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities compared to the upfront setting. However, several open questions remain to be addressed towards a broader applicability of anti-EGFR strategy in the everyday clinical practice such as the identification of the best rechallenge regimen, the right placement in mCRC therapeutic algorithm, the best ctDNA screening panel.</p><p>In our systematic review, we revised available data from clinical trials assessing anti-EGFR rechallenge activity in chemo-refractory mCRC patients, discussing as well potential future scenarios and development to implement this therapeutic approach. Particularly, we discussed the role of ctDNA as a safe, timely and comprehensive tool to refine patient’s selection and the therapeutic index of anti-EGFR rechallenge.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030573722400001X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030573722400001X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管最近在分子和免疫学方面取得了进展,但转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的预后仍然很差。在这种情况下,几项回顾性研究和 II 期研究表明,在前期抗 EGFR 方案失败后,仍有一部分患者可以从进一步的抗 EGFR 阻断治疗中获益。几项涉及循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)分析的转化研究表明,在抗 EGFR 药物的选择性压力下,可能会产生导致抗 EGFR 耐药的突变,而这些突变往往会在抗 EGFR 停药后衰减,从而有可能恢复对这种治疗策略的敏感性。因此,几项回顾性分析和最近的一项前瞻性试验表明,ctDNA RAS 和 BRAF 野生型 mCRC 患者从抗 EGFR 再挑战中获益最多。事实上,在经过分子筛选的患者中,抗EGFR再挑战策略的反应率高达30%,无进展生存期超过4个月,总生存期超过1年,与其他针对重度预处理患者的标准治疗方案相比,效果更佳。抗EGFR药物的耐受性也很好,与前期治疗相比没有意外毒性反应。在我们的系统综述中,我们修订了评估化疗难治性 mCRC 患者抗EGFR 再治疗活性的临床试验数据,并讨论了实施这种治疗方法的潜在未来方案和发展。特别是,我们讨论了ctDNA作为一种安全、及时、全面的工具在完善患者选择和抗EGFR再挑战治疗指数方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of anti-EGFR rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer, from available data to future developments: A systematic review

Despite recent molecular and immunological advancements, prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients remains poor. In this context, several retrospective and phase II studies suggested that after failure of an upfront anti-EGFR based regimen, a subset of patients can still benefit from further anti-EGFR blockade.

Several translational studies involving circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis demonstrated that cancer clones harboring mutations driving anti-EGFR resistance, which can arise under anti-EGFR agents selective pressure, often decay after anti-EGFR discontinuation potentially restoring sensitivity to this therapeutic strategy. Accordingly, several retrospective analyses and a recent prospective trial demonstrated that ctDNA RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients are those benefitting the most from anti-EGFR rechallenge. Indeed, in molecularly selected patients, anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy achieved up to 30 % response rate, with a progression free survival longer than 4 months and an overall survival longer than 1 year, which favorably compared with other standard therapeutic options available for heavily pretreated patients. Anti-EGFR is also well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities compared to the upfront setting. However, several open questions remain to be addressed towards a broader applicability of anti-EGFR strategy in the everyday clinical practice such as the identification of the best rechallenge regimen, the right placement in mCRC therapeutic algorithm, the best ctDNA screening panel.

In our systematic review, we revised available data from clinical trials assessing anti-EGFR rechallenge activity in chemo-refractory mCRC patients, discussing as well potential future scenarios and development to implement this therapeutic approach. Particularly, we discussed the role of ctDNA as a safe, timely and comprehensive tool to refine patient’s selection and the therapeutic index of anti-EGFR rechallenge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信