自我不是傻瓜战略互动中缺乏动机信念的形成

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Giovanni Burro , Alessandro Castagnetti
{"title":"自我不是傻瓜战略互动中缺乏动机信念的形成","authors":"Giovanni Burro ,&nbsp;Alessandro Castagnetti","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate whether individuals are more easily fooled by others when they enhance their personal characteristics and abilities. We use an experiment in which participants complete an IQ test and then play a sender–receiver game. The experiment has a 2x2 factorial design. First, we determine the state either by the receiver’s relative performance or by a randomly drawn number. Second, monetary incentives, which are common knowledge, are such that the sender is better off (worse off) when the receiver’s action is about him being of high (low) rank, while the receiver benefits from selecting the action that matches his true rank. We find that receivers are not more likely to believe senders or to move their action further from their prior beliefs when they provide news that carries ego-relevant information about themselves, compared to the cases in which the news carries no ego-relevant information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000077/pdfft?md5=91e6b4f92936083ce96616fe61248bba&pid=1-s2.0-S2214804324000077-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ego is no fool: Absence of motivated belief formation in strategic interactions\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Burro ,&nbsp;Alessandro Castagnetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We investigate whether individuals are more easily fooled by others when they enhance their personal characteristics and abilities. We use an experiment in which participants complete an IQ test and then play a sender–receiver game. The experiment has a 2x2 factorial design. First, we determine the state either by the receiver’s relative performance or by a randomly drawn number. Second, monetary incentives, which are common knowledge, are such that the sender is better off (worse off) when the receiver’s action is about him being of high (low) rank, while the receiver benefits from selecting the action that matches his true rank. We find that receivers are not more likely to believe senders or to move their action further from their prior beliefs when they provide news that carries ego-relevant information about themselves, compared to the cases in which the news carries no ego-relevant information.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000077/pdfft?md5=91e6b4f92936083ce96616fe61248bba&pid=1-s2.0-S2214804324000077-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了当个人的个人特征和能力增强时,是否更容易被他人愚弄。我们通过一个实验,让参与者完成智商测试,然后玩一个发送者-接收者游戏。实验采用 2x2 因式设计。首先,我们通过接收者的相对表现或随机抽取的数字来确定状态。其次,货币激励(众所周知)是这样的:当接收者的行动是关于他的高名次(低名次)时,发送者会更有利(更不利),而接收者则会从选择符合其真实名次的行动中获益。我们发现,与不包含自我相关信息的情况相比,当接收者提供的消息包含自我相关信息时,接收者并不会更倾向于相信发送者或使其行动偏离其先前的信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ego is no fool: Absence of motivated belief formation in strategic interactions

We investigate whether individuals are more easily fooled by others when they enhance their personal characteristics and abilities. We use an experiment in which participants complete an IQ test and then play a sender–receiver game. The experiment has a 2x2 factorial design. First, we determine the state either by the receiver’s relative performance or by a randomly drawn number. Second, monetary incentives, which are common knowledge, are such that the sender is better off (worse off) when the receiver’s action is about him being of high (low) rank, while the receiver benefits from selecting the action that matches his true rank. We find that receivers are not more likely to believe senders or to move their action further from their prior beliefs when they provide news that carries ego-relevant information about themselves, compared to the cases in which the news carries no ego-relevant information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信