肠道微生物群与败血症之间的遗传因果关系:来自双样本双向孟德尔随机分析的证据

Jungen Tang, Man Huang
{"title":"肠道微生物群与败血症之间的遗传因果关系:来自双样本双向孟德尔随机分析的证据","authors":"Jungen Tang,&nbsp;Man Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2023.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sepsis is a severe and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by a dysregulated host response and organ dysfunction. The causal relationship between intestinal microbiota and sepsis is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was performed to proxy the causal association between gut microbiota and sepsis. The genome-wide association study (GWAS) data of sepsis and gut microbiome were collected from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) OpenGWAS, with summary-level data obtained from the UK Biobank. Five traditional methods were used to estimate the potential causal relationships between gut microbiota and sepsis, including the inverse-variance weighted method, weighted median method, MR-Egger regression, simple mode, and weighted mode. Reverse MR analysis was performed on the bacteria that were found to be causally associated with sepsis in forward MR analysis. Cochran's <em>Q</em> statistic was used to quantify the heterogeneity of instrumental variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The inverse-variance weighted estimate suggested that class Lentisphaeria (odds ratio [OR]=0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 0.94, <em>P</em>=0.0017, <em>q</em>=0.1596) and order Victivallales (OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.94, <em>P</em>=0.0017, <em>q</em>=0.1596) have a protective effect on sepsis. The genus <em>Eubacterium eligens</em> group (OR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.63, <em>P</em>=0.0029, <em>q</em>=0.1881) was positively associated with the risk of sepsis. Sepsis may be a significant risk factor for genus <em>Odoribacter</em> (OR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.39, <em>P</em>=0.0415, <em>q</em>=0.9849) and <em>Phascolarctobacterium</em> (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.46, <em>P</em>=0.0471, <em>q</em>=0.9849), but this effect was not statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. There was a suggestive association between sepsis and <em>Faecalibacterium</em> (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.98, <em>P</em>=0.0278) and <em>Ruminococcus</em> 1 (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.00, <em>P</em>=0.0439), which were not significant after false discovery rate correction (<em>q</em>&gt;0.2).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study found that class Lentisphaeria, order Victivallales, and genus <em>Eubacterium eligens</em> group may have a causal relationship with the risk of sepsis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 362-367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X23000932/pdfft?md5=90e584504586b97ba93b9b4a49b08027&pid=1-s2.0-S2667100X23000932-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic causal association between gut microbiota and sepsis: Evidence from a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jungen Tang,&nbsp;Man Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jointm.2023.11.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sepsis is a severe and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by a dysregulated host response and organ dysfunction. The causal relationship between intestinal microbiota and sepsis is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was performed to proxy the causal association between gut microbiota and sepsis. The genome-wide association study (GWAS) data of sepsis and gut microbiome were collected from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) OpenGWAS, with summary-level data obtained from the UK Biobank. Five traditional methods were used to estimate the potential causal relationships between gut microbiota and sepsis, including the inverse-variance weighted method, weighted median method, MR-Egger regression, simple mode, and weighted mode. Reverse MR analysis was performed on the bacteria that were found to be causally associated with sepsis in forward MR analysis. Cochran's <em>Q</em> statistic was used to quantify the heterogeneity of instrumental variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The inverse-variance weighted estimate suggested that class Lentisphaeria (odds ratio [OR]=0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 0.94, <em>P</em>=0.0017, <em>q</em>=0.1596) and order Victivallales (OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.94, <em>P</em>=0.0017, <em>q</em>=0.1596) have a protective effect on sepsis. The genus <em>Eubacterium eligens</em> group (OR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.63, <em>P</em>=0.0029, <em>q</em>=0.1881) was positively associated with the risk of sepsis. Sepsis may be a significant risk factor for genus <em>Odoribacter</em> (OR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.39, <em>P</em>=0.0415, <em>q</em>=0.9849) and <em>Phascolarctobacterium</em> (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.46, <em>P</em>=0.0471, <em>q</em>=0.9849), but this effect was not statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. There was a suggestive association between sepsis and <em>Faecalibacterium</em> (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.98, <em>P</em>=0.0278) and <em>Ruminococcus</em> 1 (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.00, <em>P</em>=0.0439), which were not significant after false discovery rate correction (<em>q</em>&gt;0.2).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study found that class Lentisphaeria, order Victivallales, and genus <em>Eubacterium eligens</em> group may have a causal relationship with the risk of sepsis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of intensive medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 362-367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X23000932/pdfft?md5=90e584504586b97ba93b9b4a49b08027&pid=1-s2.0-S2667100X23000932-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of intensive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X23000932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X23000932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景败血症是一种严重且可能危及生命的疾病,其特点是宿主反应失调和器官功能障碍。方法 采用双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)方法研究肠道微生物群与败血症之间的因果关系。脓毒症和肠道微生物组的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据来自整合流行病学单位(IEU)的OpenGWAS,汇总级数据来自英国生物库。研究采用了五种传统方法来估计肠道微生物群与败血症之间的潜在因果关系,包括逆方差加权法、加权中值法、MR-Egger回归法、简单模式和加权模式。对正向 MR 分析中发现与败血症有因果关系的细菌进行反向 MR 分析。结果反方差加权估计表明,Lentisphaeria类(几率比[OR]=0.86,95%置信区间[CI]:0.78~0.94,0.78~0.94)与脓毒症的相关性较低:0.78至0.94,P=0.0017,q=0.1596)和Victivallales目(OR=0.86,95% CI:0.78至0.94,P=0.0017,q=0.1596)对败血症有保护作用。Eubacterium eligens 组属(OR=1.34,95% CI:1.11 至 1.63,P=0.0029,q=0.1881)与败血症风险呈正相关。败血症可能是Odoribacter属(OR=1.18,95% CI:1.10至1.39,P=0.0415,q=0.9849)和Phascolarctobacterium属(OR=1.21,95% CI:1.00至1.46,P=0.0471,q=0.9849)的一个重要风险因素,但经错误发现率校正后,这一效应在统计学上并不显著。败血症与粪杆菌(OR=0.85,95% CI:0.73 至 0.98,P=0.0278)和反刍球菌 1(OR=0.85,95% CI:0.73 至 1.00,P=0.0439),经假发现率校正(q>0.2)后无显著性差异。结论本研究发现,Lentisphaeria类、Victivallales目、Eubacterium属eligens组可能与败血症风险存在因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genetic causal association between gut microbiota and sepsis: Evidence from a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis

Background

Sepsis is a severe and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by a dysregulated host response and organ dysfunction. The causal relationship between intestinal microbiota and sepsis is unclear.

Methods

A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was performed to proxy the causal association between gut microbiota and sepsis. The genome-wide association study (GWAS) data of sepsis and gut microbiome were collected from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) OpenGWAS, with summary-level data obtained from the UK Biobank. Five traditional methods were used to estimate the potential causal relationships between gut microbiota and sepsis, including the inverse-variance weighted method, weighted median method, MR-Egger regression, simple mode, and weighted mode. Reverse MR analysis was performed on the bacteria that were found to be causally associated with sepsis in forward MR analysis. Cochran's Q statistic was used to quantify the heterogeneity of instrumental variables.

Results

The inverse-variance weighted estimate suggested that class Lentisphaeria (odds ratio [OR]=0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 0.94, P=0.0017, q=0.1596) and order Victivallales (OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.94, P=0.0017, q=0.1596) have a protective effect on sepsis. The genus Eubacterium eligens group (OR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.63, P=0.0029, q=0.1881) was positively associated with the risk of sepsis. Sepsis may be a significant risk factor for genus Odoribacter (OR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.39, P=0.0415, q=0.9849) and Phascolarctobacterium (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.46, P=0.0471, q=0.9849), but this effect was not statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. There was a suggestive association between sepsis and Faecalibacterium (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.98, P=0.0278) and Ruminococcus 1 (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.00, P=0.0439), which were not significant after false discovery rate correction (q>0.2).

Conclusions

This study found that class Lentisphaeria, order Victivallales, and genus Eubacterium eligens group may have a causal relationship with the risk of sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信