Adelina Baltan, Simona Costache, Abeer M Shaaban , Corrado D'Arrigo
{"title":"乳腺癌免疫检查点阻断和 PD-L1 检测综述","authors":"Adelina Baltan, Simona Costache, Abeer M Shaaban , Corrado D'Arrigo","doi":"10.1016/j.mpdhp.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In the past two decades, several drugs<span> have been developed to modulate the immune checkpoints. These modulators regulate, amongst others, the T-cell mediated immune response and may be involved in the escape from immune surveillance<span><span>. Mounting evidence in several solid tumours<span><span> points towards the effectiveness of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy used either as </span>monotherapy<span> or in combination with conventional chemotherapy. In breast cancer, ICB therapy is effective in the treatment of </span></span></span>triple negative breast cancer<span> (TNBC). Several PD-L1 companion diagnostic tests have been developed for the selection of patients more likely to benefit from this treatment. Currently, two PD-L1 assays are approved for clinical use in TNBC patients: the SP142 CDx for the use of atezolizumab and the 22C3 PharmDx for the use of </span></span></span></span>pembrolizumab. This review provides the background of PD-L1 testing in breast cancer and discusses the analytical performance of these tests, their scoring algorithms and inter-observer concordance and outlines best practice, including tissue selection, tools for interpretation and use of controls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39961,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Histopathology","volume":"30 2","pages":"Pages 110-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of immune checkpoint blockade and PD-L1 testing in breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"Adelina Baltan, Simona Costache, Abeer M Shaaban , Corrado D'Arrigo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mpdhp.2023.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>In the past two decades, several drugs<span> have been developed to modulate the immune checkpoints. These modulators regulate, amongst others, the T-cell mediated immune response and may be involved in the escape from immune surveillance<span><span>. Mounting evidence in several solid tumours<span><span> points towards the effectiveness of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy used either as </span>monotherapy<span> or in combination with conventional chemotherapy. In breast cancer, ICB therapy is effective in the treatment of </span></span></span>triple negative breast cancer<span> (TNBC). Several PD-L1 companion diagnostic tests have been developed for the selection of patients more likely to benefit from this treatment. Currently, two PD-L1 assays are approved for clinical use in TNBC patients: the SP142 CDx for the use of atezolizumab and the 22C3 PharmDx for the use of </span></span></span></span>pembrolizumab. This review provides the background of PD-L1 testing in breast cancer and discusses the analytical performance of these tests, their scoring algorithms and inter-observer concordance and outlines best practice, including tissue selection, tools for interpretation and use of controls.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Histopathology\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 110-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Histopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756231723001962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756231723001962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of immune checkpoint blockade and PD-L1 testing in breast cancer
In the past two decades, several drugs have been developed to modulate the immune checkpoints. These modulators regulate, amongst others, the T-cell mediated immune response and may be involved in the escape from immune surveillance. Mounting evidence in several solid tumours points towards the effectiveness of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy used either as monotherapy or in combination with conventional chemotherapy. In breast cancer, ICB therapy is effective in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Several PD-L1 companion diagnostic tests have been developed for the selection of patients more likely to benefit from this treatment. Currently, two PD-L1 assays are approved for clinical use in TNBC patients: the SP142 CDx for the use of atezolizumab and the 22C3 PharmDx for the use of pembrolizumab. This review provides the background of PD-L1 testing in breast cancer and discusses the analytical performance of these tests, their scoring algorithms and inter-observer concordance and outlines best practice, including tissue selection, tools for interpretation and use of controls.
期刊介绍:
This monthly review journal aims to provide the practising diagnostic pathologist and trainee pathologist with up-to-date reviews on histopathology and cytology and related technical advances. Each issue contains invited articles on a variety of topics from experts in the field and includes a mini-symposium exploring one subject in greater depth. Articles consist of system-based, disease-based reviews and advances in technology. They update the readers on day-to-day diagnostic work and keep them informed of important new developments. An additional feature is the short section devoted to hypotheses; these have been refereed. There is also a correspondence section.