基于学校背景因素的 TGT、同伴辅导和 STAD 模式的《古兰经》圣训学习效果比较

M. Muflihah, Fitriani Fitriani, Rahayu Kariadinata, Adam Malik, Yadi Rahmat
{"title":"基于学校背景因素的 TGT、同伴辅导和 STAD 模式的《古兰经》圣训学习效果比较","authors":"M. Muflihah, Fitriani Fitriani, Rahayu Kariadinata, Adam Malik, Yadi Rahmat","doi":"10.31538/tijie.v5i1.610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to compare the learning outcomes of Qur'an Hadith among three cooperative learning models, TGT, Peer Tutoring, and STAD, based on students' school backgrounds. This quantitative study used a comparative method to analyze data with SPSS 27 and the Two Way ANOVA test. The results revealed significant differences in Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes between students using the TGT model and those using Peer Tutoring, as well as between TGT and STAD (Sig.2-tailed < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in learning outcomes between Peer Tutoring and STAD (Sig.2-tailed > 0.05). There was also no significant difference based on students' school backgrounds (SD, MI) (Sig. > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no interaction between the Learning Model and School Background in determining students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes (Sig. > 0.05). Overall, TGT proved to be the most effective teaching model in enhancing students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes, while students' school backgrounds did not influence these results.","PeriodicalId":406806,"journal":{"name":"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education","volume":"61 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Qur'an Hadith Learning Results from TGT, Peer Tutoring, and STAD Models Based on School Background Factors\",\"authors\":\"M. Muflihah, Fitriani Fitriani, Rahayu Kariadinata, Adam Malik, Yadi Rahmat\",\"doi\":\"10.31538/tijie.v5i1.610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to compare the learning outcomes of Qur'an Hadith among three cooperative learning models, TGT, Peer Tutoring, and STAD, based on students' school backgrounds. This quantitative study used a comparative method to analyze data with SPSS 27 and the Two Way ANOVA test. The results revealed significant differences in Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes between students using the TGT model and those using Peer Tutoring, as well as between TGT and STAD (Sig.2-tailed < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in learning outcomes between Peer Tutoring and STAD (Sig.2-tailed > 0.05). There was also no significant difference based on students' school backgrounds (SD, MI) (Sig. > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no interaction between the Learning Model and School Background in determining students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes (Sig. > 0.05). Overall, TGT proved to be the most effective teaching model in enhancing students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes, while students' school backgrounds did not influence these results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education\",\"volume\":\"61 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i1.610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i1.610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在根据学生的学校背景,比较 TGT、同伴辅导和 STAD 三种合作学习模式对《古兰经》圣训的学习效果。本定量研究使用 SPSS 27 和双向方差分析检验对数据进行比较分析。结果显示,采用 TGT 模式的学生与采用同伴辅导模式的学生之间,以及 TGT 与 STAD 之间,在《古兰经》圣训学习成果方面存在明显差异(Sig.2-tailed < 0.05)。然而,同伴辅导和 STAD 在学习效果上没有明显差异(Sig.2-tailed > 0.05)。学生的学校背景(SD、MI)也无明显差异(Sig.> 0.05)。此外,学习模式和学校背景在决定学生的《古兰经》圣训学习成果方面没有交互作用(Sig.>0.05)。总体而言,TGT 被证明是提高学生《古兰经》圣训学习成绩最有效的教学模式,而学生的学校背景并不影响这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Qur'an Hadith Learning Results from TGT, Peer Tutoring, and STAD Models Based on School Background Factors
This research aims to compare the learning outcomes of Qur'an Hadith among three cooperative learning models, TGT, Peer Tutoring, and STAD, based on students' school backgrounds. This quantitative study used a comparative method to analyze data with SPSS 27 and the Two Way ANOVA test. The results revealed significant differences in Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes between students using the TGT model and those using Peer Tutoring, as well as between TGT and STAD (Sig.2-tailed < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in learning outcomes between Peer Tutoring and STAD (Sig.2-tailed > 0.05). There was also no significant difference based on students' school backgrounds (SD, MI) (Sig. > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no interaction between the Learning Model and School Background in determining students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes (Sig. > 0.05). Overall, TGT proved to be the most effective teaching model in enhancing students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes, while students' school backgrounds did not influence these results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信