M. Muflihah, Fitriani Fitriani, Rahayu Kariadinata, Adam Malik, Yadi Rahmat
{"title":"基于学校背景因素的 TGT、同伴辅导和 STAD 模式的《古兰经》圣训学习效果比较","authors":"M. Muflihah, Fitriani Fitriani, Rahayu Kariadinata, Adam Malik, Yadi Rahmat","doi":"10.31538/tijie.v5i1.610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to compare the learning outcomes of Qur'an Hadith among three cooperative learning models, TGT, Peer Tutoring, and STAD, based on students' school backgrounds. This quantitative study used a comparative method to analyze data with SPSS 27 and the Two Way ANOVA test. The results revealed significant differences in Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes between students using the TGT model and those using Peer Tutoring, as well as between TGT and STAD (Sig.2-tailed < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in learning outcomes between Peer Tutoring and STAD (Sig.2-tailed > 0.05). There was also no significant difference based on students' school backgrounds (SD, MI) (Sig. > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no interaction between the Learning Model and School Background in determining students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes (Sig. > 0.05). Overall, TGT proved to be the most effective teaching model in enhancing students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes, while students' school backgrounds did not influence these results.","PeriodicalId":406806,"journal":{"name":"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education","volume":"61 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Qur'an Hadith Learning Results from TGT, Peer Tutoring, and STAD Models Based on School Background Factors\",\"authors\":\"M. Muflihah, Fitriani Fitriani, Rahayu Kariadinata, Adam Malik, Yadi Rahmat\",\"doi\":\"10.31538/tijie.v5i1.610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to compare the learning outcomes of Qur'an Hadith among three cooperative learning models, TGT, Peer Tutoring, and STAD, based on students' school backgrounds. This quantitative study used a comparative method to analyze data with SPSS 27 and the Two Way ANOVA test. The results revealed significant differences in Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes between students using the TGT model and those using Peer Tutoring, as well as between TGT and STAD (Sig.2-tailed < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in learning outcomes between Peer Tutoring and STAD (Sig.2-tailed > 0.05). There was also no significant difference based on students' school backgrounds (SD, MI) (Sig. > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no interaction between the Learning Model and School Background in determining students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes (Sig. > 0.05). Overall, TGT proved to be the most effective teaching model in enhancing students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes, while students' school backgrounds did not influence these results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education\",\"volume\":\"61 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i1.610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i1.610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在根据学生的学校背景,比较 TGT、同伴辅导和 STAD 三种合作学习模式对《古兰经》圣训的学习效果。本定量研究使用 SPSS 27 和双向方差分析检验对数据进行比较分析。结果显示,采用 TGT 模式的学生与采用同伴辅导模式的学生之间,以及 TGT 与 STAD 之间,在《古兰经》圣训学习成果方面存在明显差异(Sig.2-tailed < 0.05)。然而,同伴辅导和 STAD 在学习效果上没有明显差异(Sig.2-tailed > 0.05)。学生的学校背景(SD、MI)也无明显差异(Sig.> 0.05)。此外,学习模式和学校背景在决定学生的《古兰经》圣训学习成果方面没有交互作用(Sig.>0.05)。总体而言,TGT 被证明是提高学生《古兰经》圣训学习成绩最有效的教学模式,而学生的学校背景并不影响这些结果。
Comparison of Qur'an Hadith Learning Results from TGT, Peer Tutoring, and STAD Models Based on School Background Factors
This research aims to compare the learning outcomes of Qur'an Hadith among three cooperative learning models, TGT, Peer Tutoring, and STAD, based on students' school backgrounds. This quantitative study used a comparative method to analyze data with SPSS 27 and the Two Way ANOVA test. The results revealed significant differences in Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes between students using the TGT model and those using Peer Tutoring, as well as between TGT and STAD (Sig.2-tailed < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in learning outcomes between Peer Tutoring and STAD (Sig.2-tailed > 0.05). There was also no significant difference based on students' school backgrounds (SD, MI) (Sig. > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no interaction between the Learning Model and School Background in determining students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes (Sig. > 0.05). Overall, TGT proved to be the most effective teaching model in enhancing students' Qur'an Hadith learning outcomes, while students' school backgrounds did not influence these results.