幽灵和孤儿的 MOHOA2:现代早期耶路撒冷新城当地建筑师的踪迹以及帝国边缘建筑史学面临的挑战

IF 1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Adi Bamberger Chen
{"title":"幽灵和孤儿的 MOHOA2:现代早期耶路撒冷新城当地建筑师的踪迹以及帝国边缘建筑史学面临的挑战","authors":"Adi Bamberger Chen","doi":"10.1111/cura.12592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study, inspired by postcolonial and post-structural theories, attempts to highlight the difficulty of conducting architectural research in early modern Jerusalem, a setting in which there are gaps in the historical record. One particular gap—the practice of local architects—is portrayed through two characterizations: <i>Orphans—</i>existing buildings that are historiographically detached from their genealogy—and <i>Ghosts—</i>individuals assumed to have practiced architecture, yet their existence appears only in traces. The study wishes to explore why local architects disappeared from the historiography of early modern Jerusalem. The methodologies include a narration of the fragments that were found during a literature review, archival research, site visits, interviews, and correspondence with scholars and archivists. The study suggests that local architects were overlooked because of orientalist perceptions, disappearance of evidence, and inaccessibility or illegibility of documents. Therefore, it recommends institutional collaborations and methods, which will acknowledge the historian's subjectivity in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":10791,"journal":{"name":"Curator: The Museum Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"217-238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of Ghosts and orphans: Traces of local architects in the new city of Jerusalem in the early modern era and the challenges of architectural historiography on the fringe of the Empire\",\"authors\":\"Adi Bamberger Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cura.12592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study, inspired by postcolonial and post-structural theories, attempts to highlight the difficulty of conducting architectural research in early modern Jerusalem, a setting in which there are gaps in the historical record. One particular gap—the practice of local architects—is portrayed through two characterizations: <i>Orphans—</i>existing buildings that are historiographically detached from their genealogy—and <i>Ghosts—</i>individuals assumed to have practiced architecture, yet their existence appears only in traces. The study wishes to explore why local architects disappeared from the historiography of early modern Jerusalem. The methodologies include a narration of the fragments that were found during a literature review, archival research, site visits, interviews, and correspondence with scholars and archivists. The study suggests that local architects were overlooked because of orientalist perceptions, disappearance of evidence, and inaccessibility or illegibility of documents. Therefore, it recommends institutional collaborations and methods, which will acknowledge the historian's subjectivity in future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curator: The Museum Journal\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"217-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curator: The Museum Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cura.12592\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curator: The Museum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cura.12592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究受后殖民主义和后结构理论的启发,试图强调在现代早期耶路撒冷开展建筑研究的难度,因为这里的历史记录存在空白。其中一个特殊的空白点--当地建筑师的实践--通过两种特征描述出来:孤儿--在历史学上与其谱系相脱离的现存建筑,以及幽灵--被认为从事过建筑工作的个人,但他们的存在却只是蛛丝马迹。本研究希望探讨当地建筑师为何从早期现代耶路撒冷的史学中消失。研究方法包括叙述在文献查阅、档案研究、实地考察、访谈以及与学者和档案保管员通信过程中发现的片段。研究表明,由于东方主义观念、证据的消失以及文献的不可获取或难以辨认,当地建筑师被忽视了。因此,研究建议机构合作和方法,在未来的研究中承认历史学家的主观性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Of Ghosts and orphans: Traces of local architects in the new city of Jerusalem in the early modern era and the challenges of architectural historiography on the fringe of the Empire

This study, inspired by postcolonial and post-structural theories, attempts to highlight the difficulty of conducting architectural research in early modern Jerusalem, a setting in which there are gaps in the historical record. One particular gap—the practice of local architects—is portrayed through two characterizations: Orphans—existing buildings that are historiographically detached from their genealogy—and Ghosts—individuals assumed to have practiced architecture, yet their existence appears only in traces. The study wishes to explore why local architects disappeared from the historiography of early modern Jerusalem. The methodologies include a narration of the fragments that were found during a literature review, archival research, site visits, interviews, and correspondence with scholars and archivists. The study suggests that local architects were overlooked because of orientalist perceptions, disappearance of evidence, and inaccessibility or illegibility of documents. Therefore, it recommends institutional collaborations and methods, which will acknowledge the historian's subjectivity in future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curator: The Museum Journal
Curator: The Museum Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信