孕期每日口服 PrEP 对乌干达少女和年轻妇女骨矿物质密度的影响

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kidist Zewdie, F. Kiweewa, Timothy Ssebuliba, Susan A. Morrison, Timothy R Muwonge, Jade Boyer, Felix Bambia, Josephine Badaru, Gabrielle Stein, K. Mugwanya, Christina Wyatt, Michael T. Yin, A. Mujugira, Renee Heffron
{"title":"孕期每日口服 PrEP 对乌干达少女和年轻妇女骨矿物质密度的影响","authors":"Kidist Zewdie, F. Kiweewa, Timothy Ssebuliba, Susan A. Morrison, Timothy R Muwonge, Jade Boyer, Felix Bambia, Josephine Badaru, Gabrielle Stein, K. Mugwanya, Christina Wyatt, Michael T. Yin, A. Mujugira, Renee Heffron","doi":"10.3389/frph.2023.1240990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is recommended during pregnancy for at-risk cisgender women. Pregnancy is known to impede bone growth and tenofovir-based PrEP may also yield detrimental changes to bone health. Thus, we evaluated the effect of PrEP use during pregnancy on bone mineral density (BMD).We used data from a cohort of women who were sexually active, HIV-negative, ages 16–25 years, initiating DMPA or choosing condoms for contraception and enrolled in the Kampala Women's Bone Study. Women were followed quarterly with rapid testing for HIV and pregnancy, PrEP dispensation, and adherence counseling. Those who became pregnant were counseled on PrEP use during pregnancy per national guidelines. BMD of the neck of the hip, total hip, and lumbar spine was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and annually. We compared the mean percent change in BMD from baseline to month 24.Among 499 women enrolled in the study, 105 pregnancies occurred in 90 women. At enrollment, the median age was 20 years (IQR: 19–21) and 89% initiated PrEP. During pregnancy, 67% of women continued using PrEP and PrEP was dispensed in 64% of visits. BMD declined significantly in women using PrEP during pregnancy compared to women who were not pregnant nor used PrEP: relative BMD change was −2.26% (95% CI: −4.63 to 0.11, p = 0.06) in the femoral neck, −2.57% (95% CI: −4.48 to −0.66, p = 0.01) in total hip, −3.06% (95% CI: −5.49 to −0.63, p = 0.001) lumbar spine. There was no significant difference in BMD loss when comparing PrEP-exposed pregnant women to pregnant women who never used PrEP. Women who became pregnant were less likely to continue PrEP at subsequent study visits than women who did not become pregnant (adjOR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.16–0.37, p < 0.001). Based on pill counts, there was a 62% reduction in the odds of high PrEP adherence during pregnancy (adjOR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.27–0.58, p < 0.001).Women who used PrEP during pregnancy experienced a similar reduction in BMD as pregnant women with no PrEP exposure, indicating that BMD loss in PrEP-using pregnant women is largely driven by pregnancy and not PrEP.","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"27 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of daily oral PrEP use during pregnancy on bone mineral density among adolescent girls and young women in Uganda\",\"authors\":\"Kidist Zewdie, F. Kiweewa, Timothy Ssebuliba, Susan A. Morrison, Timothy R Muwonge, Jade Boyer, Felix Bambia, Josephine Badaru, Gabrielle Stein, K. Mugwanya, Christina Wyatt, Michael T. Yin, A. Mujugira, Renee Heffron\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frph.2023.1240990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is recommended during pregnancy for at-risk cisgender women. Pregnancy is known to impede bone growth and tenofovir-based PrEP may also yield detrimental changes to bone health. Thus, we evaluated the effect of PrEP use during pregnancy on bone mineral density (BMD).We used data from a cohort of women who were sexually active, HIV-negative, ages 16–25 years, initiating DMPA or choosing condoms for contraception and enrolled in the Kampala Women's Bone Study. Women were followed quarterly with rapid testing for HIV and pregnancy, PrEP dispensation, and adherence counseling. Those who became pregnant were counseled on PrEP use during pregnancy per national guidelines. BMD of the neck of the hip, total hip, and lumbar spine was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and annually. We compared the mean percent change in BMD from baseline to month 24.Among 499 women enrolled in the study, 105 pregnancies occurred in 90 women. At enrollment, the median age was 20 years (IQR: 19–21) and 89% initiated PrEP. During pregnancy, 67% of women continued using PrEP and PrEP was dispensed in 64% of visits. BMD declined significantly in women using PrEP during pregnancy compared to women who were not pregnant nor used PrEP: relative BMD change was −2.26% (95% CI: −4.63 to 0.11, p = 0.06) in the femoral neck, −2.57% (95% CI: −4.48 to −0.66, p = 0.01) in total hip, −3.06% (95% CI: −5.49 to −0.63, p = 0.001) lumbar spine. There was no significant difference in BMD loss when comparing PrEP-exposed pregnant women to pregnant women who never used PrEP. Women who became pregnant were less likely to continue PrEP at subsequent study visits than women who did not become pregnant (adjOR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.16–0.37, p < 0.001). Based on pill counts, there was a 62% reduction in the odds of high PrEP adherence during pregnancy (adjOR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.27–0.58, p < 0.001).Women who used PrEP during pregnancy experienced a similar reduction in BMD as pregnant women with no PrEP exposure, indicating that BMD loss in PrEP-using pregnant women is largely driven by pregnancy and not PrEP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in reproductive health\",\"volume\":\"27 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in reproductive health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1240990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1240990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建议高危顺性女性在怀孕期间口服暴露前预防药物(PrEP)。众所周知,怀孕会阻碍骨骼生长,而基于替诺福韦的 PrEP 也可能对骨骼健康产生不利影响。因此,我们评估了孕期使用 PrEP 对骨矿物质密度(BMD)的影响。我们使用的数据来自性活跃、HIV 阴性、16-25 岁、开始使用 DMPA 或选择安全套避孕并参加坎帕拉女性骨研究的女性队列。每季度对妇女进行一次随访,对其进行 HIV 和妊娠快速检测,发放 PrEP,并为其提供坚持治疗方面的咨询。根据国家指导方针,怀孕妇女在怀孕期间接受了关于使用 PrEP 的咨询。在基线期和每年使用双能 X 射线吸收测量法测量髋关节颈、全髋和腰椎的 BMD。我们比较了从基线到第 24 个月期间 BMD 的平均百分比变化。在参加研究的 499 名妇女中,有 90 名妇女怀孕 105 次。入组时,中位年龄为 20 岁(IQR:19-21 岁),89% 的妇女开始接受 PrEP 治疗。怀孕期间,67% 的妇女继续使用 PrEP,64% 的就诊者获得了 PrEP。与未怀孕也未使用 PrEP 的妇女相比,怀孕期间使用 PrEP 的妇女的 BMD 明显下降:股骨颈的相对 BMD 变化为 -2.26%(95% CI:-4.63 至 0.11,p = 0.06),全髋的相对 BMD 变化为 -2.57%(95% CI:-4.48 至 -0.66,p = 0.01),腰椎的相对 BMD 变化为 -3.06%(95% CI:-5.49 至 -0.63,p = 0.001)。与接触过 PrEP 的孕妇相比,从未使用过 PrEP 的孕妇在 BMD 损失方面没有明显差异。与未怀孕的女性相比,怀孕女性在随后的研究访问中继续使用 PrEP 的可能性较低(adjOR:0.25,95% CI:0.16-0.37,p <0.001)。根据服药次数,怀孕期间高度坚持 PrEP 的几率降低了 62%(adjOR = 0.38,95% CI:0.27-0.58,p < 0.001)。怀孕期间使用 PrEP 的女性与未接触过 PrEP 的孕妇的 BMD 下降情况相似,这表明使用 PrEP 的孕妇的 BMD 下降主要是由怀孕而非 PrEP 引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of daily oral PrEP use during pregnancy on bone mineral density among adolescent girls and young women in Uganda
Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is recommended during pregnancy for at-risk cisgender women. Pregnancy is known to impede bone growth and tenofovir-based PrEP may also yield detrimental changes to bone health. Thus, we evaluated the effect of PrEP use during pregnancy on bone mineral density (BMD).We used data from a cohort of women who were sexually active, HIV-negative, ages 16–25 years, initiating DMPA or choosing condoms for contraception and enrolled in the Kampala Women's Bone Study. Women were followed quarterly with rapid testing for HIV and pregnancy, PrEP dispensation, and adherence counseling. Those who became pregnant were counseled on PrEP use during pregnancy per national guidelines. BMD of the neck of the hip, total hip, and lumbar spine was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and annually. We compared the mean percent change in BMD from baseline to month 24.Among 499 women enrolled in the study, 105 pregnancies occurred in 90 women. At enrollment, the median age was 20 years (IQR: 19–21) and 89% initiated PrEP. During pregnancy, 67% of women continued using PrEP and PrEP was dispensed in 64% of visits. BMD declined significantly in women using PrEP during pregnancy compared to women who were not pregnant nor used PrEP: relative BMD change was −2.26% (95% CI: −4.63 to 0.11, p = 0.06) in the femoral neck, −2.57% (95% CI: −4.48 to −0.66, p = 0.01) in total hip, −3.06% (95% CI: −5.49 to −0.63, p = 0.001) lumbar spine. There was no significant difference in BMD loss when comparing PrEP-exposed pregnant women to pregnant women who never used PrEP. Women who became pregnant were less likely to continue PrEP at subsequent study visits than women who did not become pregnant (adjOR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.16–0.37, p < 0.001). Based on pill counts, there was a 62% reduction in the odds of high PrEP adherence during pregnancy (adjOR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.27–0.58, p < 0.001).Women who used PrEP during pregnancy experienced a similar reduction in BMD as pregnant women with no PrEP exposure, indicating that BMD loss in PrEP-using pregnant women is largely driven by pregnancy and not PrEP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信