驾驭配方奶粉短缺:在 2022 年全国配方奶粉短缺期间,父母对改用替代婴儿配方奶粉治疗牛乳蛋白过敏症的看法的联系

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY
Abigail L. Fabbrini, Andrew A. Farrar, Jerry M. Brown, Lea Oliveros, J. Florio, Jesse Beacker, Luke Lamos, Jessica V Baran, Michael J Wilsey
{"title":"驾驭配方奶粉短缺:在 2022 年全国配方奶粉短缺期间,父母对改用替代婴儿配方奶粉治疗牛乳蛋白过敏症的看法的联系","authors":"Abigail L. Fabbrini, Andrew A. Farrar, Jerry M. Brown, Lea Oliveros, J. Florio, Jesse Beacker, Luke Lamos, Jessica V Baran, Michael J Wilsey","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2023.1333570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic led to supply chain disruptions causing a severe shortage of infant formula. The shortage impacted parents of infants with cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) who rely on specialized formulas. However, research on parent perspectives during formula shortages is limited. We aimed to understand the factors guiding parents' decisions when transitioning to alternative amino acid formula (AAF) or extensively hydrolyzed formula (eHF) during the national formula shortage. We conducted a survey using the ZSMoments platform and found that before the shortage, parents valued safety (83%), tolerability (78%), and reputability (78%) as primary factors in selecting eHFs and AAFs. Post-shortage, formula tolerability (86%), assurance (84%), and safety (80%) gained more importance. Among those switching eHF (n = 54), health care provider recommendations (81%), reputability (78%), taste (78%), and tolerability (78%) were rated as “extremely important.” Among those switching AAF (n = 26), top factors included tolerability (77%), assurance (73%), safety (73%), cost-effectiveness (73%), and formula trustworthiness (73%). These data suggest that parents carefully weigh various factors when managing their child's CMPA and transitioning to different AAF or eHF options.","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":"1 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating formula shortages: associations of parental perspectives on transitioning to alternative infant formulas for cow's milk protein allergy during the 2022 national formula shortage\",\"authors\":\"Abigail L. Fabbrini, Andrew A. Farrar, Jerry M. Brown, Lea Oliveros, J. Florio, Jesse Beacker, Luke Lamos, Jessica V Baran, Michael J Wilsey\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/falgy.2023.1333570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic led to supply chain disruptions causing a severe shortage of infant formula. The shortage impacted parents of infants with cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) who rely on specialized formulas. However, research on parent perspectives during formula shortages is limited. We aimed to understand the factors guiding parents' decisions when transitioning to alternative amino acid formula (AAF) or extensively hydrolyzed formula (eHF) during the national formula shortage. We conducted a survey using the ZSMoments platform and found that before the shortage, parents valued safety (83%), tolerability (78%), and reputability (78%) as primary factors in selecting eHFs and AAFs. Post-shortage, formula tolerability (86%), assurance (84%), and safety (80%) gained more importance. Among those switching eHF (n = 54), health care provider recommendations (81%), reputability (78%), taste (78%), and tolerability (78%) were rated as “extremely important.” Among those switching AAF (n = 26), top factors included tolerability (77%), assurance (73%), safety (73%), cost-effectiveness (73%), and formula trustworthiness (73%). These data suggest that parents carefully weigh various factors when managing their child's CMPA and transitioning to different AAF or eHF options.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in allergy\",\"volume\":\"1 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1333570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1333570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行导致供应链中断,造成婴儿配方奶粉严重短缺。配方奶粉短缺影响了那些依赖专用配方奶粉的牛奶蛋白过敏(CMPA)婴儿的父母。然而,有关配方奶粉短缺期间家长观点的研究十分有限。我们的目的是了解在全国配方奶粉短缺期间,指导家长决定过渡到替代氨基酸配方奶粉(AAF)或广泛水解配方奶粉(eHF)的因素。我们使用 ZSMoments 平台进行了一项调查,结果发现,在配方奶粉短缺之前,父母在选择 eHF 和 AAF 时,主要看重安全性(83%)、耐受性(78%)和声誉(78%)。奶粉短缺后,配方奶粉的耐受性(86%)、保证性(84%)和安全性(80%)变得更加重要。在更换易合奶粉的人群中(n = 54),医疗保健提供者的建议(81%)、信誉(78%)、口味(78%)和耐受性(78%)被评为 "极其重要"。在更换 AAF 的人群中(n = 26),最重要的因素包括耐受性(77%)、保证(73%)、安全性(73%)、成本效益(73%)和配方奶粉的可信度(73%)。这些数据表明,家长在管理孩子的 CMPA 和过渡到不同的 AAF 或 eHF 选择时,应仔细权衡各种因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating formula shortages: associations of parental perspectives on transitioning to alternative infant formulas for cow's milk protein allergy during the 2022 national formula shortage
The COVID-19 pandemic led to supply chain disruptions causing a severe shortage of infant formula. The shortage impacted parents of infants with cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) who rely on specialized formulas. However, research on parent perspectives during formula shortages is limited. We aimed to understand the factors guiding parents' decisions when transitioning to alternative amino acid formula (AAF) or extensively hydrolyzed formula (eHF) during the national formula shortage. We conducted a survey using the ZSMoments platform and found that before the shortage, parents valued safety (83%), tolerability (78%), and reputability (78%) as primary factors in selecting eHFs and AAFs. Post-shortage, formula tolerability (86%), assurance (84%), and safety (80%) gained more importance. Among those switching eHF (n = 54), health care provider recommendations (81%), reputability (78%), taste (78%), and tolerability (78%) were rated as “extremely important.” Among those switching AAF (n = 26), top factors included tolerability (77%), assurance (73%), safety (73%), cost-effectiveness (73%), and formula trustworthiness (73%). These data suggest that parents carefully weigh various factors when managing their child's CMPA and transitioning to different AAF or eHF options.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信