人工智能危害分析分类标准

IF 2.2 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
M.L Cummings
{"title":"人工智能危害分析分类标准","authors":"M.L Cummings","doi":"10.1177/15553434231224096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rise of artificial intelligence in safety-critical systems like surface transportation, there is a commensurate need for new hazard analysis approaches to determine if and how AI contributes to accidents, which are also increasing in number and severity. The original Swiss Cheese model widely used for hazard analyses focuses uniquely on human activities that lead to accidents, but cannot address accidents where AI is a possible causal factor. To this end, the Taxonomy for AI Hazard Analysis (TAIHA) is proposed that introduces layers focusing on the oversight, design, maintenance, and testing of AI. TAIHA is illustrated with real-world accidents. TAIHA does not replace the traditional Swiss Cheese model, which should be used in concert when a joint human-AI system exists, such as when people are driving a car with AI-based advanced driving assist features.","PeriodicalId":46342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","volume":"34 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Taxonomy for AI Hazard Analysis\",\"authors\":\"M.L Cummings\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15553434231224096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the rise of artificial intelligence in safety-critical systems like surface transportation, there is a commensurate need for new hazard analysis approaches to determine if and how AI contributes to accidents, which are also increasing in number and severity. The original Swiss Cheese model widely used for hazard analyses focuses uniquely on human activities that lead to accidents, but cannot address accidents where AI is a possible causal factor. To this end, the Taxonomy for AI Hazard Analysis (TAIHA) is proposed that introduces layers focusing on the oversight, design, maintenance, and testing of AI. TAIHA is illustrated with real-world accidents. TAIHA does not replace the traditional Swiss Cheese model, which should be used in concert when a joint human-AI system exists, such as when people are driving a car with AI-based advanced driving assist features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"34 32\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434231224096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434231224096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人工智能在地面运输等安全关键系统中的兴起,人们相应地需要新的危险分析方法来确定人工智能是否以及如何导致事故,而事故的数量和严重程度也在不断增加。最初广泛用于危险分析的 "瑞士奶酪 "模型只关注导致事故的人类活动,但无法解决人工智能可能是致因的事故。为此,我们提出了人工智能危害分析分类标准(TAIHA),引入了人工智能的监督、设计、维护和测试等层面。TAIHA 以现实世界中的事故为例来说明。TAIHA 并不取代传统的瑞士奶酪模型,当存在人类与人工智能联合系统时,例如当人们驾驶一辆带有基于人工智能的高级辅助驾驶功能的汽车时,应协同使用该模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Taxonomy for AI Hazard Analysis
With the rise of artificial intelligence in safety-critical systems like surface transportation, there is a commensurate need for new hazard analysis approaches to determine if and how AI contributes to accidents, which are also increasing in number and severity. The original Swiss Cheese model widely used for hazard analyses focuses uniquely on human activities that lead to accidents, but cannot address accidents where AI is a possible causal factor. To this end, the Taxonomy for AI Hazard Analysis (TAIHA) is proposed that introduces layers focusing on the oversight, design, maintenance, and testing of AI. TAIHA is illustrated with real-world accidents. TAIHA does not replace the traditional Swiss Cheese model, which should be used in concert when a joint human-AI system exists, such as when people are driving a car with AI-based advanced driving assist features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信