心脏中的 "蘑菇空间不大":真菌感染性心内膜炎的已知与未知数

Wilhelm Mistiaen
{"title":"心脏中的 \"蘑菇空间不大\":真菌感染性心内膜炎的已知与未知数","authors":"Wilhelm Mistiaen","doi":"10.20517/2574-1209.2023.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fungal infective endocarditis is a rare but highly lethal condition. Its diagnosis is often delayed due to nonspecific symptoms, inconclusive medical imaging, and negative blood cultures. Recent reviews of cases and series over the last 5 years indicate that the condition remains rare and lethal. If fungi are identified as the causative agents in more than 5% of patient cases with infective endocarditis, it is likely that risk factors such as immune suppression or cardiac implants are probably involved. A series derived from recent case reports indicates that Candida and Aspergillus are still the main causative infectious agents, with. C parapsilosis on the rise. From these cases, diagnostic clues (frequent embolisms, ophthalmic involvement, large, mobile and friable vegetation, non-valvular cardiac manifestations) are pointing towards fungal IE. These reports, however, are not standardized and a publication bias towards rare microorganisms or towards a favorable outcome might exist. Complications might be underreported, and important data such as diagnostic delay are absent or difficult to retrieve. Pharmacologic treatment is not fully standardized. Knowledge of resistant strains in this respect is important. Statistical analysis for the effect of complications and treatment modalities on outcome shows that any result should be treated cautiously. The current series is by no means a valid substitute for a well-designed series of fungal endocarditis. However, the better outcome with Candida and patients treated with surgery confirm earlier results. An international multicentric standardized registry of cases with fungal endocarditis in order to improve the outcome of this disease is highly needed. The effect of diagnostic delay on outcome remains elusive and should be resolved.","PeriodicalId":75299,"journal":{"name":"Vessel plus","volume":"6 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Not much room for mushrooms” in the heart: knowns and unknowns of fungal infective endocarditis\",\"authors\":\"Wilhelm Mistiaen\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/2574-1209.2023.77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fungal infective endocarditis is a rare but highly lethal condition. Its diagnosis is often delayed due to nonspecific symptoms, inconclusive medical imaging, and negative blood cultures. Recent reviews of cases and series over the last 5 years indicate that the condition remains rare and lethal. If fungi are identified as the causative agents in more than 5% of patient cases with infective endocarditis, it is likely that risk factors such as immune suppression or cardiac implants are probably involved. A series derived from recent case reports indicates that Candida and Aspergillus are still the main causative infectious agents, with. C parapsilosis on the rise. From these cases, diagnostic clues (frequent embolisms, ophthalmic involvement, large, mobile and friable vegetation, non-valvular cardiac manifestations) are pointing towards fungal IE. These reports, however, are not standardized and a publication bias towards rare microorganisms or towards a favorable outcome might exist. Complications might be underreported, and important data such as diagnostic delay are absent or difficult to retrieve. Pharmacologic treatment is not fully standardized. Knowledge of resistant strains in this respect is important. Statistical analysis for the effect of complications and treatment modalities on outcome shows that any result should be treated cautiously. The current series is by no means a valid substitute for a well-designed series of fungal endocarditis. However, the better outcome with Candida and patients treated with surgery confirm earlier results. An international multicentric standardized registry of cases with fungal endocarditis in order to improve the outcome of this disease is highly needed. The effect of diagnostic delay on outcome remains elusive and should be resolved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vessel plus\",\"volume\":\"6 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vessel plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vessel plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

真菌感染性心内膜炎是一种罕见但致死率极高的疾病。由于非特异性症状、医学影像不确定以及血液培养阴性,该病的诊断往往被延误。最近 5 年对病例和系列病例的回顾表明,这种疾病仍然罕见且致命。如果在超过 5%的感染性心内膜炎患者病例中真菌被确定为致病因子,则可能与免疫抑制或心脏植入物等危险因素有关。从最近的病例报告中得出的一系列结果表明,念珠菌和曲霉菌仍然是主要的致病感染病原体,而副丝状酵母菌则呈上升趋势。副丝状念珠菌病呈上升趋势。从这些病例来看,诊断线索(频繁的栓塞、眼部受累、大块、可移动和易碎的植被、非瓣膜性心脏表现)都指向真菌性 IE。然而,这些报告并不规范,可能存在对罕见微生物或有利结果的发表偏差。并发症可能未得到充分报道,诊断延误等重要数据缺失或难以检索。药物治疗尚未完全标准化。在这方面,了解耐药菌株非常重要。对并发症和治疗方式对结果影响的统计分析显示,任何结果都应谨慎对待。目前的系列研究绝不能有效替代精心设计的真菌性心内膜炎系列研究。不过,念珠菌感染和接受手术治疗的患者的预后较好,这证实了之前的研究结果。我们亟需对真菌性心内膜炎病例进行国际多中心标准化登记,以改善该病的治疗效果。诊断延误对预后的影响仍然难以捉摸,应该加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Not much room for mushrooms” in the heart: knowns and unknowns of fungal infective endocarditis
Fungal infective endocarditis is a rare but highly lethal condition. Its diagnosis is often delayed due to nonspecific symptoms, inconclusive medical imaging, and negative blood cultures. Recent reviews of cases and series over the last 5 years indicate that the condition remains rare and lethal. If fungi are identified as the causative agents in more than 5% of patient cases with infective endocarditis, it is likely that risk factors such as immune suppression or cardiac implants are probably involved. A series derived from recent case reports indicates that Candida and Aspergillus are still the main causative infectious agents, with. C parapsilosis on the rise. From these cases, diagnostic clues (frequent embolisms, ophthalmic involvement, large, mobile and friable vegetation, non-valvular cardiac manifestations) are pointing towards fungal IE. These reports, however, are not standardized and a publication bias towards rare microorganisms or towards a favorable outcome might exist. Complications might be underreported, and important data such as diagnostic delay are absent or difficult to retrieve. Pharmacologic treatment is not fully standardized. Knowledge of resistant strains in this respect is important. Statistical analysis for the effect of complications and treatment modalities on outcome shows that any result should be treated cautiously. The current series is by no means a valid substitute for a well-designed series of fungal endocarditis. However, the better outcome with Candida and patients treated with surgery confirm earlier results. An international multicentric standardized registry of cases with fungal endocarditis in order to improve the outcome of this disease is highly needed. The effect of diagnostic delay on outcome remains elusive and should be resolved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信