{"title":"用可解释的人工智能加强冬季道路养护:用 SHAP 分析法解释道路摩擦力估算中的机器学习模型","authors":"Xueru Ding, Tae J. Kwon","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2023-0410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective winter road maintenance relies on precise road friction estimation. Machine learning (ML) models have shown significant promise in this; however, their inherent complexity makes understanding their inner workings challenging. This paper addresses this issue by conducting a comparative analysis of road friction estimation models using four ML methods, including regression tree, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and support vector regression (SVR). We then employ the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) explainable artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance model interpretability. Our analysis on an Alberta dataset reveals that the XGBoost model performs best with an accuracy of 91.39%. The SHAP analysis illustrates the logical relationships between predictor features and friction within all three tree-based models, but it also uncovers inconsistencies within the SVR model, potentially attributed to insufficient feature interactions. Thus, this paper not only showcase the role of explainable AI in improving the ML interpretability of models for road friction estimation, but also provides practical insights that could improve winter road maintenance decisions.","PeriodicalId":9414,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"2 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing winter road maintenance with explainable AI: SHAP analysis for interpreting machine learning models in road friction estimation\",\"authors\":\"Xueru Ding, Tae J. Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjce-2023-0410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effective winter road maintenance relies on precise road friction estimation. Machine learning (ML) models have shown significant promise in this; however, their inherent complexity makes understanding their inner workings challenging. This paper addresses this issue by conducting a comparative analysis of road friction estimation models using four ML methods, including regression tree, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and support vector regression (SVR). We then employ the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) explainable artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance model interpretability. Our analysis on an Alberta dataset reveals that the XGBoost model performs best with an accuracy of 91.39%. The SHAP analysis illustrates the logical relationships between predictor features and friction within all three tree-based models, but it also uncovers inconsistencies within the SVR model, potentially attributed to insufficient feature interactions. Thus, this paper not only showcase the role of explainable AI in improving the ML interpretability of models for road friction estimation, but also provides practical insights that could improve winter road maintenance decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"2 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2023-0410\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2023-0410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有效的冬季道路养护有赖于精确的道路摩擦力估算。机器学习(ML)模型在这方面显示出了巨大的前景;然而,由于其固有的复杂性,了解其内部工作原理具有挑战性。本文针对这一问题,使用四种 ML 方法(包括回归树、随机森林、极梯度提升 (XGBoost) 和支持向量回归 (SVR))对道路摩擦力估算模型进行了比较分析。然后,我们采用 SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) 可解释人工智能 (AI) 来增强模型的可解释性。我们对阿尔伯塔省数据集的分析表明,XGBoost 模型的准确率为 91.39%,表现最佳。SHAP 分析表明了所有三种基于树的模型中预测特征与摩擦之间的逻辑关系,但也发现了 SVR 模型中的不一致之处,这可能是由于特征交互不足造成的。因此,本文不仅展示了可解释人工智能在改善道路摩擦力估算模型的 ML 可解释性方面的作用,还提供了可改善冬季道路维护决策的实用见解。
Enhancing winter road maintenance with explainable AI: SHAP analysis for interpreting machine learning models in road friction estimation
Effective winter road maintenance relies on precise road friction estimation. Machine learning (ML) models have shown significant promise in this; however, their inherent complexity makes understanding their inner workings challenging. This paper addresses this issue by conducting a comparative analysis of road friction estimation models using four ML methods, including regression tree, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and support vector regression (SVR). We then employ the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) explainable artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance model interpretability. Our analysis on an Alberta dataset reveals that the XGBoost model performs best with an accuracy of 91.39%. The SHAP analysis illustrates the logical relationships between predictor features and friction within all three tree-based models, but it also uncovers inconsistencies within the SVR model, potentially attributed to insufficient feature interactions. Thus, this paper not only showcase the role of explainable AI in improving the ML interpretability of models for road friction estimation, but also provides practical insights that could improve winter road maintenance decisions.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the official journal of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. It contains articles on environmental engineering, hydrotechnical engineering, structural engineering, construction engineering, engineering mechanics, engineering materials, and history of civil engineering. Contributors include recognized researchers and practitioners in industry, government, and academia. New developments in engineering design and construction are also featured.