心理干预在预防监狱服刑人员自杀行为和自残方面的效率:系统回顾

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW
Anna Pedrola-Pons , Yolanda Sanchez-Carro , Andres Pemau , Adriana Garcia-Ramos , Alejandro De la Torre-Luque
{"title":"心理干预在预防监狱服刑人员自杀行为和自残方面的效率:系统回顾","authors":"Anna Pedrola-Pons ,&nbsp;Yolanda Sanchez-Carro ,&nbsp;Andres Pemau ,&nbsp;Adriana Garcia-Ramos ,&nbsp;Alejandro De la Torre-Luque","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Suicidal behavior is an important public health problem, with a high prevalence in penitentiary context. Nowadays, there is a wide variety of specific treatment programs, aimed to prevent suicidal and self-injurious behavior in incarcerated people. These programs show relative efficiency depending on the model of the psychological intervention applied. This systematic review evaluates the efficiency of suicidal and self-injurious behavior prevention programs in prisons.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Empirical studies, evaluating prevention programs for suicidal and self-injurious behavior in penitentiary context were considered for inclusion. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) directives were followed. Studies from 1990 to 2022 were reviewed, based on the review developed by Winicov (2019) that covered the time lapse between 1990 and 2015. Articles from 2015 to 2022 were located by database research (EBSCOHost, ScienceDirect, PubMed &amp; ProQuest).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>44,050 potential studies were identified. Eighteen were included in this systematic review (9 studies by Winicov, 2019). 14 studies showed efficacy of intervention programs on self-injury behavior. The use of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) reduced suicidal ideation. In addition, positive results were observed in 3 studies using third-generation therapies as an intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Suicidal and self-injurious behavior in prison shows lower levels of incidence when specific treatment programs are applied. It's crucial to increase the evaluation in relation to the implementation of new treatment models (i.e., Dialectical Behavior Therapy - DBT, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - ACT, Mindfulness, Functional Analytic Psychotherapy – FAP) as to better orientate prevention strategies. Further research is needed in gender sensitive interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 101948"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000912/pdfft?md5=372ff0565b721856b18869c6252cf991&pid=1-s2.0-S0160252723000912-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of psychological interventions in the prevention of suicidal behavior and self-injury in penitentiary population: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Anna Pedrola-Pons ,&nbsp;Yolanda Sanchez-Carro ,&nbsp;Andres Pemau ,&nbsp;Adriana Garcia-Ramos ,&nbsp;Alejandro De la Torre-Luque\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Suicidal behavior is an important public health problem, with a high prevalence in penitentiary context. Nowadays, there is a wide variety of specific treatment programs, aimed to prevent suicidal and self-injurious behavior in incarcerated people. These programs show relative efficiency depending on the model of the psychological intervention applied. This systematic review evaluates the efficiency of suicidal and self-injurious behavior prevention programs in prisons.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Empirical studies, evaluating prevention programs for suicidal and self-injurious behavior in penitentiary context were considered for inclusion. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) directives were followed. Studies from 1990 to 2022 were reviewed, based on the review developed by Winicov (2019) that covered the time lapse between 1990 and 2015. Articles from 2015 to 2022 were located by database research (EBSCOHost, ScienceDirect, PubMed &amp; ProQuest).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>44,050 potential studies were identified. Eighteen were included in this systematic review (9 studies by Winicov, 2019). 14 studies showed efficacy of intervention programs on self-injury behavior. The use of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) reduced suicidal ideation. In addition, positive results were observed in 3 studies using third-generation therapies as an intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Suicidal and self-injurious behavior in prison shows lower levels of incidence when specific treatment programs are applied. It's crucial to increase the evaluation in relation to the implementation of new treatment models (i.e., Dialectical Behavior Therapy - DBT, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - ACT, Mindfulness, Functional Analytic Psychotherapy – FAP) as to better orientate prevention strategies. Further research is needed in gender sensitive interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000912/pdfft?md5=372ff0565b721856b18869c6252cf991&pid=1-s2.0-S0160252723000912-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000912\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 自杀行为是一个重要的公共卫生问题,在监狱环境中非常普遍。如今,有各种各样的专门治疗方案,旨在预防被监禁者的自杀和自残行为。这些方案的相对效率取决于所采用的心理干预模式。本系统性综述评估了监狱中自杀和自残行为预防计划的效率。方法考虑纳入对监狱中自杀和自残行为预防计划进行评估的实证研究。研究遵循 PRISMA(系统综述和 Meta 分析的首选报告项目)指令。根据 Winicov(2019 年)制定的审查方法,对 1990 年至 2022 年的研究进行了审查,审查时间跨度为 1990 年至 2015 年。通过数据库研究(EBSCOHost、ScienceDirect、PubMed & ProQuest)找到了2015年至2022年的文章。本系统综述纳入了 18 项研究(9 项研究由 Winicov 于 2019 年完成)。14项研究表明,干预计划对自我伤害行为具有疗效。认知行为疗法(CBT)的使用减少了自杀意念。此外,3 项使用第三代疗法作为干预措施的研究也观察到了积极的结果。结论如果采用特定的治疗方案,监狱中自杀和自伤行为的发生率会降低。加强对新治疗模式(即辩证行为疗法(DBT)、接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)、正念、功能分析心理疗法(FAP))实施情况的评估至关重要,以便更好地确定预防策略的方向。需要进一步研究对性别问题有敏感认识的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency of psychological interventions in the prevention of suicidal behavior and self-injury in penitentiary population: A systematic review

Introduction

Suicidal behavior is an important public health problem, with a high prevalence in penitentiary context. Nowadays, there is a wide variety of specific treatment programs, aimed to prevent suicidal and self-injurious behavior in incarcerated people. These programs show relative efficiency depending on the model of the psychological intervention applied. This systematic review evaluates the efficiency of suicidal and self-injurious behavior prevention programs in prisons.

Method

Empirical studies, evaluating prevention programs for suicidal and self-injurious behavior in penitentiary context were considered for inclusion. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) directives were followed. Studies from 1990 to 2022 were reviewed, based on the review developed by Winicov (2019) that covered the time lapse between 1990 and 2015. Articles from 2015 to 2022 were located by database research (EBSCOHost, ScienceDirect, PubMed & ProQuest).

Results

44,050 potential studies were identified. Eighteen were included in this systematic review (9 studies by Winicov, 2019). 14 studies showed efficacy of intervention programs on self-injury behavior. The use of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) reduced suicidal ideation. In addition, positive results were observed in 3 studies using third-generation therapies as an intervention.

Conclusions

Suicidal and self-injurious behavior in prison shows lower levels of incidence when specific treatment programs are applied. It's crucial to increase the evaluation in relation to the implementation of new treatment models (i.e., Dialectical Behavior Therapy - DBT, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - ACT, Mindfulness, Functional Analytic Psychotherapy – FAP) as to better orientate prevention strategies. Further research is needed in gender sensitive interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信