印度煤都丹巴德不同主要来源的 PM2.5 排放源概况

IF 3.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kumar Gaurav Mishra , Prakashmani , Tarun Gupta , Saifi Izhar
{"title":"印度煤都丹巴德不同主要来源的 PM2.5 排放源概况","authors":"Kumar Gaurav Mishra ,&nbsp;Prakashmani ,&nbsp;Tarun Gupta ,&nbsp;Saifi Izhar","doi":"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rise of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) levels in urban areas, driven by traffic, construction, and combustion emissions, has prompted urgent air quality concerns. Understanding source-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical characteristics and developing associated source markers is essential for knowing their accurate contribution to atmospheric PM<sub>2.5</sub>. This study focuses on developing PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical source profiles from nine different emissions, primarily categorized under traffic and combustion sources. The chemical characterization included the carbonaceous thermal fractions, inorganic ions, and elemental composition. Heterogeneity in chemical composition across emission sources was examined using the coefficient of divergence and diagnostic ratio, and finally, source-specific chemical fingerprints were developed using the ratio normalization approach. The finding revealed significant inter and intra-variation in the chemical composition among traffic and combustion emission sources. Organic matter is observed significantly higher in combustion sources (84%–92%) than in traffic sources (22%–45%). Both OC/EC and char-EC/soot-EC values showed much higher values for combustion sources than traffic emissions, with cow dung cake burning emissions displaying the largest values. Also, char-EC/soot-EC values showed a similar trend with OC/EC values and thus can be used as an additional marker for deciphering emission sources. The ion-balance ratio revealed particle emissions from coal, cow dung, and garbage burning to be highly acidic, while traffic and construction sources were alkaline. Source marker results provide new insights into differences in the chemical fingerprint of specific emission sources. A new set of source markers was seen for garbage burning while coal-burning emissions showed varying chemical fingerprints and were found to be dependent on coal processing. Among elements, bromine and chlorine are found to be the unique markers for cow dung cake-burning emissions. Receptor models can use the database developed from the current work to demarcate the emission sources accurately and benefit the regulatory bodies in developing efficient control measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37150,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment: X","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000029/pdfft?md5=4cb2bc88f05e23bb5e76f6a66e7156e4&pid=1-s2.0-S2590162124000029-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source profile of PM2.5 emissions from different primary sources in the coal capital city Dhanbad, India\",\"authors\":\"Kumar Gaurav Mishra ,&nbsp;Prakashmani ,&nbsp;Tarun Gupta ,&nbsp;Saifi Izhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The rise of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) levels in urban areas, driven by traffic, construction, and combustion emissions, has prompted urgent air quality concerns. Understanding source-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical characteristics and developing associated source markers is essential for knowing their accurate contribution to atmospheric PM<sub>2.5</sub>. This study focuses on developing PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical source profiles from nine different emissions, primarily categorized under traffic and combustion sources. The chemical characterization included the carbonaceous thermal fractions, inorganic ions, and elemental composition. Heterogeneity in chemical composition across emission sources was examined using the coefficient of divergence and diagnostic ratio, and finally, source-specific chemical fingerprints were developed using the ratio normalization approach. The finding revealed significant inter and intra-variation in the chemical composition among traffic and combustion emission sources. Organic matter is observed significantly higher in combustion sources (84%–92%) than in traffic sources (22%–45%). Both OC/EC and char-EC/soot-EC values showed much higher values for combustion sources than traffic emissions, with cow dung cake burning emissions displaying the largest values. Also, char-EC/soot-EC values showed a similar trend with OC/EC values and thus can be used as an additional marker for deciphering emission sources. The ion-balance ratio revealed particle emissions from coal, cow dung, and garbage burning to be highly acidic, while traffic and construction sources were alkaline. Source marker results provide new insights into differences in the chemical fingerprint of specific emission sources. A new set of source markers was seen for garbage burning while coal-burning emissions showed varying chemical fingerprints and were found to be dependent on coal processing. Among elements, bromine and chlorine are found to be the unique markers for cow dung cake-burning emissions. Receptor models can use the database developed from the current work to demarcate the emission sources accurately and benefit the regulatory bodies in developing efficient control measures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Environment: X\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000029/pdfft?md5=4cb2bc88f05e23bb5e76f6a66e7156e4&pid=1-s2.0-S2590162124000029-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Environment: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在交通、建筑和燃烧排放的推动下,城市地区细颗粒物(PM2.5)水平的上升引发了人们对空气质量的迫切关注。了解特定来源的 PM2.5 化学特征并开发相关的来源标记,对于准确了解它们对大气 PM2.5 的贡献至关重要。本研究的重点是从九种不同的排放物(主要分为交通源和燃烧源)中提取 PM2.5 化学源特征。化学特征包括碳质热组分、无机离子和元素组成。利用发散系数和诊断比对不同排放源的化学成分异质性进行了研究,最后利用比值归一化方法建立了特定排放源的化学指纹。研究结果表明,交通和燃烧排放源之间的化学成分存在明显的内部和外部差异。在燃烧源中观察到的有机物(84%-92%)明显高于交通源(22%-45%)。燃烧排放源的有机物浓度/有机碳浓度和炭质浓度/烟尘浓度值均远高于交通排放源,其中牛粪饼燃烧排放源的数值最大。此外,木炭-EC/烟尘-EC 值的变化趋势与 OC/EC 值相似,因此可作为解读排放源的额外标记。离子平衡比显示,煤炭、牛粪和垃圾焚烧产生的颗粒物排放呈强酸性,而交通和建筑源则呈碱性。源标记结果为了解特定排放源的化学指纹差异提供了新的视角。垃圾焚烧产生了一组新的源标记,而燃煤排放则显示出不同的化学指纹,并被发现与煤炭加工有关。在各种元素中,溴和氯被发现是牛粪饼燃烧排放的独特标记。受体模型可以利用目前工作中开发的数据库来准确划分排放源,并有利于监管机构制定有效的控制措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Source profile of PM2.5 emissions from different primary sources in the coal capital city Dhanbad, India

Source profile of PM2.5 emissions from different primary sources in the coal capital city Dhanbad, India

The rise of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) levels in urban areas, driven by traffic, construction, and combustion emissions, has prompted urgent air quality concerns. Understanding source-specific PM2.5 chemical characteristics and developing associated source markers is essential for knowing their accurate contribution to atmospheric PM2.5. This study focuses on developing PM2.5 chemical source profiles from nine different emissions, primarily categorized under traffic and combustion sources. The chemical characterization included the carbonaceous thermal fractions, inorganic ions, and elemental composition. Heterogeneity in chemical composition across emission sources was examined using the coefficient of divergence and diagnostic ratio, and finally, source-specific chemical fingerprints were developed using the ratio normalization approach. The finding revealed significant inter and intra-variation in the chemical composition among traffic and combustion emission sources. Organic matter is observed significantly higher in combustion sources (84%–92%) than in traffic sources (22%–45%). Both OC/EC and char-EC/soot-EC values showed much higher values for combustion sources than traffic emissions, with cow dung cake burning emissions displaying the largest values. Also, char-EC/soot-EC values showed a similar trend with OC/EC values and thus can be used as an additional marker for deciphering emission sources. The ion-balance ratio revealed particle emissions from coal, cow dung, and garbage burning to be highly acidic, while traffic and construction sources were alkaline. Source marker results provide new insights into differences in the chemical fingerprint of specific emission sources. A new set of source markers was seen for garbage burning while coal-burning emissions showed varying chemical fingerprints and were found to be dependent on coal processing. Among elements, bromine and chlorine are found to be the unique markers for cow dung cake-burning emissions. Receptor models can use the database developed from the current work to demarcate the emission sources accurately and benefit the regulatory bodies in developing efficient control measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment: X
Atmospheric Environment: X Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信