草地管理:保持植物和蚯蚓多样性的必要手段

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Kevin Hoeffner , Frédérique Louault , Lou Lerner , Guénola Pérès
{"title":"草地管理:保持植物和蚯蚓多样性的必要手段","authors":"Kevin Hoeffner ,&nbsp;Frédérique Louault ,&nbsp;Lou Lerner ,&nbsp;Guénola Pérès","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2023.103589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In temperate grassland, earthworms contribute to the major soil processes which determine most of the ecosystem services. The characteristics of plant communities in grassland are key factors in maintaining earthworm communities, however effects of different herbage management on earthworms remain largely unknown. In this context, the aim of the present study was to determine the long-term effects of herbage management on grassland plant and earthworm communities. Plants and earthworms were sampled in a 14-years-old experiment in upland grasslands (Massif central, France). Abandoned grasslands were compared with mowed grasslands and with pastures grazed by cattle (at low or high intensities) or grazed by sheep (at low intensity). Compared to abandoned grassland, herbage management by grazing or by mowing display higher leguminous plant<span>, community-weighted mean Ellenberg light values as well as plant richness while they display lower percentage of plant litter<span> and community-weighted mean Ellenberg nitrogen values. The differences in plant richness were associated with a significant change in plant community structure. Compared to the abandoned grassland, herbage management by grazing or mowing significantly display higher earthworm biomass and total richness. Except for pastures grazed by cattle at high intensity, earthworm abundance was at least twice that in the grassland at low grazing intensity or mowing compared to the abandoned grassland. Earthworm communities were significantly different between grazed and mown treatments notably due to changes within </span></span></span><span><em>Aporrectodea</em></span> anecic and endogeic earthworm species. Overall, herbage management by animals or by mechanical export is beneficial for plant and earthworm diversity although no clear differences between management practices for earthworm richness, total biomass or total abundance were observed. Our results highlight that abandonment does not preserve biodiversity (plant, soil macrofauna) while management of grassland by grazing or mowing is a necessary tool for biodiversity conservation and improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of grassland: A necessary tool to maintain plant and earthworm diversity\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Hoeffner ,&nbsp;Frédérique Louault ,&nbsp;Lou Lerner ,&nbsp;Guénola Pérès\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2023.103589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>In temperate grassland, earthworms contribute to the major soil processes which determine most of the ecosystem services. The characteristics of plant communities in grassland are key factors in maintaining earthworm communities, however effects of different herbage management on earthworms remain largely unknown. In this context, the aim of the present study was to determine the long-term effects of herbage management on grassland plant and earthworm communities. Plants and earthworms were sampled in a 14-years-old experiment in upland grasslands (Massif central, France). Abandoned grasslands were compared with mowed grasslands and with pastures grazed by cattle (at low or high intensities) or grazed by sheep (at low intensity). Compared to abandoned grassland, herbage management by grazing or by mowing display higher leguminous plant<span>, community-weighted mean Ellenberg light values as well as plant richness while they display lower percentage of plant litter<span> and community-weighted mean Ellenberg nitrogen values. The differences in plant richness were associated with a significant change in plant community structure. Compared to the abandoned grassland, herbage management by grazing or mowing significantly display higher earthworm biomass and total richness. Except for pastures grazed by cattle at high intensity, earthworm abundance was at least twice that in the grassland at low grazing intensity or mowing compared to the abandoned grassland. Earthworm communities were significantly different between grazed and mown treatments notably due to changes within </span></span></span><span><em>Aporrectodea</em></span> anecic and endogeic earthworm species. Overall, herbage management by animals or by mechanical export is beneficial for plant and earthworm diversity although no clear differences between management practices for earthworm richness, total biomass or total abundance were observed. Our results highlight that abandonment does not preserve biodiversity (plant, soil macrofauna) while management of grassland by grazing or mowing is a necessary tool for biodiversity conservation and improvement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Biology\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556323001255\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556323001255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在温带草地上,蚯蚓参与了决定大多数生态系统服务的主要土壤过程。草地植物群落的特征是维持蚯蚓群落的关键因素,但不同的草料管理对蚯蚓的影响在很大程度上仍不为人所知。因此,本研究旨在确定草料管理对草地植物和蚯蚓群落的长期影响。在高地草地(法国中部马西夫)进行的一项为期 14 年的实验中,对植物和蚯蚓进行了取样。将废弃草地与割草草地、牛(低强度或高强度)牧场或羊(低强度)牧场进行了比较。与废弃草地相比,通过放牧或刈割进行草场管理的草地显示出较高的豆科植物、群落加权平均艾伦伯格光值以及植物丰富度,而它们显示出较低的植物凋落物百分比和群落加权平均艾伦伯格氮值。植物丰富度的差异与植物群落结构的显著变化有关。与废弃草地相比,通过放牧或刈割进行草料管理的草地的蚯蚓生物量和总丰富度明显较高。除了高强度放牧的草场外,低强度放牧或刈割的草场的蚯蚓数量至少是废弃草场的两倍。蚯蚓群落在放牧和刈割处理之间存在明显差异,这主要是由于Aporrectodea anecic和endogeic蚯蚓物种发生了变化。总体而言,通过动物或机械输出进行草料管理有利于植物和蚯蚓的多样性,尽管在蚯蚓丰富度、总生物量或总丰度方面,不同管理方法之间没有明显差异。我们的研究结果突出表明,弃耕并不能保护生物多样性(植物、土壤大型动物),而通过放牧或割草对草地进行管理则是保护和改善生物多样性的必要手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of grassland: A necessary tool to maintain plant and earthworm diversity

In temperate grassland, earthworms contribute to the major soil processes which determine most of the ecosystem services. The characteristics of plant communities in grassland are key factors in maintaining earthworm communities, however effects of different herbage management on earthworms remain largely unknown. In this context, the aim of the present study was to determine the long-term effects of herbage management on grassland plant and earthworm communities. Plants and earthworms were sampled in a 14-years-old experiment in upland grasslands (Massif central, France). Abandoned grasslands were compared with mowed grasslands and with pastures grazed by cattle (at low or high intensities) or grazed by sheep (at low intensity). Compared to abandoned grassland, herbage management by grazing or by mowing display higher leguminous plant, community-weighted mean Ellenberg light values as well as plant richness while they display lower percentage of plant litter and community-weighted mean Ellenberg nitrogen values. The differences in plant richness were associated with a significant change in plant community structure. Compared to the abandoned grassland, herbage management by grazing or mowing significantly display higher earthworm biomass and total richness. Except for pastures grazed by cattle at high intensity, earthworm abundance was at least twice that in the grassland at low grazing intensity or mowing compared to the abandoned grassland. Earthworm communities were significantly different between grazed and mown treatments notably due to changes within Aporrectodea anecic and endogeic earthworm species. Overall, herbage management by animals or by mechanical export is beneficial for plant and earthworm diversity although no clear differences between management practices for earthworm richness, total biomass or total abundance were observed. Our results highlight that abandonment does not preserve biodiversity (plant, soil macrofauna) while management of grassland by grazing or mowing is a necessary tool for biodiversity conservation and improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信