非洲妇女和女童中切割女性生殖器的流行率及相关因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Asteray Assmie Ayenew, Ben W Mol, Billie Bradford, Gedefaw Abeje
{"title":"非洲妇女和女童中切割女性生殖器的流行率及相关因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Asteray Assmie Ayenew, Ben W Mol, Billie Bradford, Gedefaw Abeje","doi":"10.1186/s13643-023-02428-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Female genital mutilation (FGM) has zero health benefits. It can lead to short- and long-term risks and complications, including physical, sexual, and mental health and well-being of girls and women. It is a worldwide public health issue with more than 80% prevalence in Africa. It is a global imperative to strengthen work for the elimination, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) strives to eliminate FGM and monitor the progress made. However, one of a challenge in tracking progress is establishing baseline prevalence data within regions and countries. Therefore, this review aimed to pool the prevalence of FGM in Africa and identify the promoting factors among women and girls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist guideline. Both published and unpublished studies conducted from 2012 onwards were eligible. Studies written in non-English languages were excluded. To retrieve relevant studies; PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Science Direct, African Journals Online databases, and African Index Medicus (AIM) were searched using a combination of searching terms. The Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale (NOS) tool was used to assess the quality of each included study. The Cochran's Q chi-square and I<sup>2</sup> statistical tests were used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the included studies. The Funnel plot and Egger's regression test (p value < 0.05) were used to evaluate meh publication bias. We used STATA for analysis and the overall and subgroup pooled effect size was estimated using the random effect model with DerSimonian and Laired pooled effect method. The overall prevalence of FGM and the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95%CI (confidence interval) for contributing factors were calculated and presented using a forest plot.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>This study included 155 primary studies conducted on the prevalence and/or factors associated with FGM in Africa. The pooled prevalence of FGM was 56.4% (95%CI 49.7-63.6). The primary factors promoting the practice of FGM were family history of circumcision (AOR = 13.71, 95%CI 9.11-20.62), being a Muslim religion follower (AOR = 3.51, 95%CI 2.61-4.71), poor wealth index (AOR = 1.38, 95%CI1.27-1.51), higher age (AOR = 2.95, 95%CI 2.49-3.38), not attending formal education (AOR = 3.28, 95%CI 2.62-4.12), and rural residency (AOR = 2.27, 95%CI 1.84-2.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of FGM in Africa was found to be high. This study also observed a variation in FGM prevalence across regions and countries and a slight temporal decline over the study period. As the global community enters the final decade dedicated to eliminating FGM, there remains much to be done to achieve the elimination goal.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of female genital mutilation and associated factors among women and girls in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Asteray Assmie Ayenew, Ben W Mol, Billie Bradford, Gedefaw Abeje\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-023-02428-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Female genital mutilation (FGM) has zero health benefits. It can lead to short- and long-term risks and complications, including physical, sexual, and mental health and well-being of girls and women. It is a worldwide public health issue with more than 80% prevalence in Africa. It is a global imperative to strengthen work for the elimination, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) strives to eliminate FGM and monitor the progress made. However, one of a challenge in tracking progress is establishing baseline prevalence data within regions and countries. Therefore, this review aimed to pool the prevalence of FGM in Africa and identify the promoting factors among women and girls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist guideline. Both published and unpublished studies conducted from 2012 onwards were eligible. Studies written in non-English languages were excluded. To retrieve relevant studies; PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Science Direct, African Journals Online databases, and African Index Medicus (AIM) were searched using a combination of searching terms. The Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale (NOS) tool was used to assess the quality of each included study. The Cochran's Q chi-square and I<sup>2</sup> statistical tests were used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the included studies. The Funnel plot and Egger's regression test (p value < 0.05) were used to evaluate meh publication bias. We used STATA for analysis and the overall and subgroup pooled effect size was estimated using the random effect model with DerSimonian and Laired pooled effect method. The overall prevalence of FGM and the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95%CI (confidence interval) for contributing factors were calculated and presented using a forest plot.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>This study included 155 primary studies conducted on the prevalence and/or factors associated with FGM in Africa. The pooled prevalence of FGM was 56.4% (95%CI 49.7-63.6). The primary factors promoting the practice of FGM were family history of circumcision (AOR = 13.71, 95%CI 9.11-20.62), being a Muslim religion follower (AOR = 3.51, 95%CI 2.61-4.71), poor wealth index (AOR = 1.38, 95%CI1.27-1.51), higher age (AOR = 2.95, 95%CI 2.49-3.38), not attending formal education (AOR = 3.28, 95%CI 2.62-4.12), and rural residency (AOR = 2.27, 95%CI 1.84-2.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of FGM in Africa was found to be high. This study also observed a variation in FGM prevalence across regions and countries and a slight temporal decline over the study period. As the global community enters the final decade dedicated to eliminating FGM, there remains much to be done to achieve the elimination goal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10785359/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02428-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02428-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:切割女性生殖器(FGM)对健康毫无益处。它可能导致短期和长期的风险和并发症,包括女童和妇女的身体、性和心理健康与福祉。这是一个世界性的公共卫生问题,在非洲的流行率超过 80%。加强消除工作是全球的当务之急,联合国可持续发展目标(SDG)致力于消除切割女性生殖器的做法并监测所取得的进展。然而,跟踪进展的挑战之一是建立地区和国家内的基线流行率数据。因此,本综述旨在汇集非洲切割女性生殖器官的流行情况,并确定妇女和女童中的促进因素:本综述按照 PRISMA 核对表指南进行。2012年以来发表和未发表的研究均符合条件。以非英语语言撰写的研究除外。为了检索相关研究,我们使用多种检索词对 PubMed/Medline、Google Scholar、Science Direct、African Journals Online 数据库和 African Index Medicus (AIM) 进行了检索。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华评估量表(NOS)工具评估每项纳入研究的质量。Cochran's Q 齐次方和 I2 统计检验用于评估纳入研究的异质性。漏斗图和 Egger 回归检验(P 值小于 0.05)用于评估发表偏倚。我们使用 STATA 进行分析,并使用随机效应模型和 DerSimonian 和 Laired 汇集效应法估算了总体和亚组的集合效应大小。我们还计算了女性外阴残割的总体流行率和调整后的几率比(AOR),以及诱因的 95%CI(置信区间),并用森林图进行了展示:结果:本研究包括 155 项关于非洲女性外阴残割流行率和/或相关因素的主要研究。汇总的女性外阴残割流行率为 56.4%(95%CI 49.7-63.6)。促使女性生殖器切割的主要因素是家族有包皮环切史(AOR = 13.71,95%CI 9.11-20.62)、信奉穆斯林宗教(AOR = 3.51,95%CI 2.61-4.71)、贫穷指数(AOR = 1.38,95%CI1.27-1.51)、年龄较大(AOR = 2.95,95%CI 2.49-3.38)、未接受正规教育(AOR = 3.28,95%CI 2.62-4.12)和居住在农村(AOR = 2.27,95%CI 1.84-2.80):结论:女性外阴残割在非洲的流行率很高。这项研究还观察到女性生殖器切割的流行率在不同地区和国家之间存在差异,并且在研究期间略有下降。随着全球社会进入致力于消除切割女性生殖器官现象的最后十年,要实现消除这一现象的目标仍有许多工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of female genital mutilation and associated factors among women and girls in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Female genital mutilation (FGM) has zero health benefits. It can lead to short- and long-term risks and complications, including physical, sexual, and mental health and well-being of girls and women. It is a worldwide public health issue with more than 80% prevalence in Africa. It is a global imperative to strengthen work for the elimination, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) strives to eliminate FGM and monitor the progress made. However, one of a challenge in tracking progress is establishing baseline prevalence data within regions and countries. Therefore, this review aimed to pool the prevalence of FGM in Africa and identify the promoting factors among women and girls.

Methods: This review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist guideline. Both published and unpublished studies conducted from 2012 onwards were eligible. Studies written in non-English languages were excluded. To retrieve relevant studies; PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Science Direct, African Journals Online databases, and African Index Medicus (AIM) were searched using a combination of searching terms. The Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale (NOS) tool was used to assess the quality of each included study. The Cochran's Q chi-square and I2 statistical tests were used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the included studies. The Funnel plot and Egger's regression test (p value < 0.05) were used to evaluate meh publication bias. We used STATA for analysis and the overall and subgroup pooled effect size was estimated using the random effect model with DerSimonian and Laired pooled effect method. The overall prevalence of FGM and the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95%CI (confidence interval) for contributing factors were calculated and presented using a forest plot.

Result: This study included 155 primary studies conducted on the prevalence and/or factors associated with FGM in Africa. The pooled prevalence of FGM was 56.4% (95%CI 49.7-63.6). The primary factors promoting the practice of FGM were family history of circumcision (AOR = 13.71, 95%CI 9.11-20.62), being a Muslim religion follower (AOR = 3.51, 95%CI 2.61-4.71), poor wealth index (AOR = 1.38, 95%CI1.27-1.51), higher age (AOR = 2.95, 95%CI 2.49-3.38), not attending formal education (AOR = 3.28, 95%CI 2.62-4.12), and rural residency (AOR = 2.27, 95%CI 1.84-2.80).

Conclusion: The prevalence of FGM in Africa was found to be high. This study also observed a variation in FGM prevalence across regions and countries and a slight temporal decline over the study period. As the global community enters the final decade dedicated to eliminating FGM, there remains much to be done to achieve the elimination goal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信