卧床 60 天后实际行走速度的变化。

IF 4.4 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Marcello Grassi, Fiona Von Der Straten, Charlotte Pearce, Jessica Lee, Marcin Mider, Uwe Mittag, Wolfram Sies, Edwin Mulder, Martin Daumer, Jörn Rittweger
{"title":"卧床 60 天后实际行走速度的变化。","authors":"Marcello Grassi, Fiona Von Der Straten, Charlotte Pearce, Jessica Lee, Marcin Mider, Uwe Mittag, Wolfram Sies, Edwin Mulder, Martin Daumer, Jörn Rittweger","doi":"10.1038/s41526-023-00342-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this work was to explore whether real-world walking speed (RWS) would change as a consequence of 60-day bed-rest. The main hypothesis was that daily RWS would decrease after the bed-rest, with a subsequent recovery during the first days of re-ambulation. Moreover, an exploratory analysis was done in order to understand whether there is an agreement between the loss in RWS after bed-rest and the loss in the maximum oxygen uptake capacity (VO<sub>2max</sub>), or the loss in maximal vertical jump power (JUMP) respectively. Twenty-four subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a continuous artificial gravity group, an intermittent artificial gravity group, or a control group. The fitted linear mixed effects model showed a significant decrease (p < 0.001) of RWS after the 60-day bed-rest and a subsequent increase (p < 0.001) of RWS during the 14-day recovery period in the study facility. No or little agreement was found between the loss in RWS and the loss in VO<sub>2max</sub> capacity or the loss in maximal vertical jumping power (RWS vs. VO<sub>2max</sub>: p = 0.81, RWS vs. JUMP: p = 0.173). Decreased RWS after bed-rest, with a follow-up recovery was observed for all three groups, regardless of the training intervention. This suggests that RWS, also in these settings, was able to reflect a de-conditioning and follow-up recovery process.</p>","PeriodicalId":54263,"journal":{"name":"npj Microgravity","volume":"10 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in real-world walking speed following 60-day bed-rest.\",\"authors\":\"Marcello Grassi, Fiona Von Der Straten, Charlotte Pearce, Jessica Lee, Marcin Mider, Uwe Mittag, Wolfram Sies, Edwin Mulder, Martin Daumer, Jörn Rittweger\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41526-023-00342-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this work was to explore whether real-world walking speed (RWS) would change as a consequence of 60-day bed-rest. The main hypothesis was that daily RWS would decrease after the bed-rest, with a subsequent recovery during the first days of re-ambulation. Moreover, an exploratory analysis was done in order to understand whether there is an agreement between the loss in RWS after bed-rest and the loss in the maximum oxygen uptake capacity (VO<sub>2max</sub>), or the loss in maximal vertical jump power (JUMP) respectively. Twenty-four subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a continuous artificial gravity group, an intermittent artificial gravity group, or a control group. The fitted linear mixed effects model showed a significant decrease (p < 0.001) of RWS after the 60-day bed-rest and a subsequent increase (p < 0.001) of RWS during the 14-day recovery period in the study facility. No or little agreement was found between the loss in RWS and the loss in VO<sub>2max</sub> capacity or the loss in maximal vertical jumping power (RWS vs. VO<sub>2max</sub>: p = 0.81, RWS vs. JUMP: p = 0.173). Decreased RWS after bed-rest, with a follow-up recovery was observed for all three groups, regardless of the training intervention. This suggests that RWS, also in these settings, was able to reflect a de-conditioning and follow-up recovery process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj Microgravity\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786829/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj Microgravity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-023-00342-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Microgravity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-023-00342-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在探讨实际行走速度(RWS)是否会因 60 天卧床休息而发生变化。主要假设是,卧床休息后每天的行走速度会下降,随后在重新下床活动的最初几天会恢复。此外,我们还进行了一项探索性分析,以了解卧床休息后 RWS 的下降与最大摄氧量(VO2max)的下降或最大垂直跳跃力(JUMP)的下降是否一致。24 名受试者被随机分配到三组中的一组:持续人工重力组、间歇人工重力组或对照组。拟合的线性混合效应模型显示,最大垂直跳跃能力或最大垂直跳跃力量(RWS vs. VO2max:p = 0.81,RWS vs. JUMP:p = 0.173)显著下降(p 2max)。在卧床休息后,无论训练干预措施如何,都可以观察到所有三组的 RWS 都有所下降,但后续恢复情况良好。这表明,在这些情况下,RWS 也能反映去调节和后续恢复过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in real-world walking speed following 60-day bed-rest.

The aim of this work was to explore whether real-world walking speed (RWS) would change as a consequence of 60-day bed-rest. The main hypothesis was that daily RWS would decrease after the bed-rest, with a subsequent recovery during the first days of re-ambulation. Moreover, an exploratory analysis was done in order to understand whether there is an agreement between the loss in RWS after bed-rest and the loss in the maximum oxygen uptake capacity (VO2max), or the loss in maximal vertical jump power (JUMP) respectively. Twenty-four subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a continuous artificial gravity group, an intermittent artificial gravity group, or a control group. The fitted linear mixed effects model showed a significant decrease (p < 0.001) of RWS after the 60-day bed-rest and a subsequent increase (p < 0.001) of RWS during the 14-day recovery period in the study facility. No or little agreement was found between the loss in RWS and the loss in VO2max capacity or the loss in maximal vertical jumping power (RWS vs. VO2max: p = 0.81, RWS vs. JUMP: p = 0.173). Decreased RWS after bed-rest, with a follow-up recovery was observed for all three groups, regardless of the training intervention. This suggests that RWS, also in these settings, was able to reflect a de-conditioning and follow-up recovery process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
npj Microgravity
npj Microgravity Physics and Astronomy-Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: A new open access, online-only, multidisciplinary research journal, npj Microgravity is dedicated to publishing the most important scientific advances in the life sciences, physical sciences, and engineering fields that are facilitated by spaceflight and analogue platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信