对加成制造的膝下假肢套筒进行静态失效预测的数值模拟和实验测试。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Kavuri Karthik Rajashekar, Srinivasa Prakash Regalla, Kurra Suresh, Prakash Narayan Shrivastava
{"title":"对加成制造的膝下假肢套筒进行静态失效预测的数值模拟和实验测试。","authors":"Kavuri Karthik Rajashekar, Srinivasa Prakash Regalla, Kurra Suresh, Prakash Narayan Shrivastava","doi":"10.1177/09544119231221179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The socket of a transtibial prosthesis is a structural part customized to a patient's amputated residual lower limb. The free-form geometry of the socket can be suitable for additive manufacturing (AM) to save time and cost. However, the mechanical fracture of additively manufactured lower limb prostheses is not yet fully understood. A novel experimental method and numerical approach by finite element method (FEM) to test the strength and fracture behavior of a lower limb prosthetic socket of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), reverse-engineered using computer-aided design (CAD) from the actual amputee's residual limb and manufactured using fused filament fabrication (FFF) are proposed in the present work. The mechanical behavior, von Mises stress distribution, and the damage status of layered AM sockets of different thicknesses were simulated by FEM using Hashin's transversely isotropic mechanical damage model, initially developed for composite materials. The experimental work showed that the fracture failure initiated at the corner of the lobe in the 4 mm thickness socket at a failure load of 918.5 N. The FEM results predicted this failure load to be 896.6 N, with only a 2.45% error as compared to the experiment. The failure loads predicted by FEM in the sockets with thicknesses of 3, 5, and 6 mm were 618.1, 1008.6, and 1105.2 N, respectively. The present work provides a dependable method for testing a below-knee prosthetic socket against static failure and arriving at a factor-of-safety (FoS) based socket thickness selection for any amputee.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical simulation and experimental testing for static failure prediction in additively manufactured below-knee prosthetic sockets.\",\"authors\":\"Kavuri Karthik Rajashekar, Srinivasa Prakash Regalla, Kurra Suresh, Prakash Narayan Shrivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09544119231221179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The socket of a transtibial prosthesis is a structural part customized to a patient's amputated residual lower limb. The free-form geometry of the socket can be suitable for additive manufacturing (AM) to save time and cost. However, the mechanical fracture of additively manufactured lower limb prostheses is not yet fully understood. A novel experimental method and numerical approach by finite element method (FEM) to test the strength and fracture behavior of a lower limb prosthetic socket of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), reverse-engineered using computer-aided design (CAD) from the actual amputee's residual limb and manufactured using fused filament fabrication (FFF) are proposed in the present work. The mechanical behavior, von Mises stress distribution, and the damage status of layered AM sockets of different thicknesses were simulated by FEM using Hashin's transversely isotropic mechanical damage model, initially developed for composite materials. The experimental work showed that the fracture failure initiated at the corner of the lobe in the 4 mm thickness socket at a failure load of 918.5 N. The FEM results predicted this failure load to be 896.6 N, with only a 2.45% error as compared to the experiment. The failure loads predicted by FEM in the sockets with thicknesses of 3, 5, and 6 mm were 618.1, 1008.6, and 1105.2 N, respectively. The present work provides a dependable method for testing a below-knee prosthetic socket against static failure and arriving at a factor-of-safety (FoS) based socket thickness selection for any amputee.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119231221179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119231221179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经胫假肢的插座是根据患者截肢后的残余下肢定制的结构部件。义肢套筒的自由几何形状可适用于快速成型制造(AM),以节省时间和成本。然而,人们对增材制造下肢假肢的机械断裂尚未完全了解。本研究提出了一种新颖的实验方法和有限元法(FEM)数值方法,以测试丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS)下肢假肢插座的强度和断裂行为,该假肢插座由计算机辅助设计(CAD)从实际截肢者的残肢逆向设计,并采用熔融长丝制造(FFF)工艺制造而成。利用最初为复合材料开发的 Hashin 横向各向同性机械损伤模型,通过有限元模拟了不同厚度的分层 AM 套筒的机械行为、冯-米塞斯应力分布和损伤状态。实验结果表明,在 918.5 牛顿的破坏载荷下,厚度为 4 毫米的插座在叶角处开始断裂。有限元分析结果预测的破坏载荷为 896.6 牛顿,与实验结果相比,误差仅为 2.45%。在厚度为 3、5 和 6 毫米的插座中,有限元预测的破坏载荷分别为 618.1、1008.6 和 1105.2 牛顿。本研究提供了一种可靠的方法来测试膝下假肢套筒的静态失效,并根据安全系数(FoS)为任何截肢者选择套筒厚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical simulation and experimental testing for static failure prediction in additively manufactured below-knee prosthetic sockets.

The socket of a transtibial prosthesis is a structural part customized to a patient's amputated residual lower limb. The free-form geometry of the socket can be suitable for additive manufacturing (AM) to save time and cost. However, the mechanical fracture of additively manufactured lower limb prostheses is not yet fully understood. A novel experimental method and numerical approach by finite element method (FEM) to test the strength and fracture behavior of a lower limb prosthetic socket of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), reverse-engineered using computer-aided design (CAD) from the actual amputee's residual limb and manufactured using fused filament fabrication (FFF) are proposed in the present work. The mechanical behavior, von Mises stress distribution, and the damage status of layered AM sockets of different thicknesses were simulated by FEM using Hashin's transversely isotropic mechanical damage model, initially developed for composite materials. The experimental work showed that the fracture failure initiated at the corner of the lobe in the 4 mm thickness socket at a failure load of 918.5 N. The FEM results predicted this failure load to be 896.6 N, with only a 2.45% error as compared to the experiment. The failure loads predicted by FEM in the sockets with thicknesses of 3, 5, and 6 mm were 618.1, 1008.6, and 1105.2 N, respectively. The present work provides a dependable method for testing a below-knee prosthetic socket against static failure and arriving at a factor-of-safety (FoS) based socket thickness selection for any amputee.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信