Hongshi Zhang , Xiaotu Zhang , Yidan Wang , Xuefeng Sun , Sixuan Li , Jindan Zhang , Jundong Jiao
{"title":"中医锻炼对纤维肌痛综合征的影响:随机对照试验的元分析》。","authors":"Hongshi Zhang , Xiaotu Zhang , Yidan Wang , Xuefeng Sun , Sixuan Li , Jindan Zhang , Jundong Jiao","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To explore the efficacy and safety of five traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to TCEs published from inception until February 2023. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to determine the combined effects of the intervention, and the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and Review 5.2 software were used to assess methodological quality. The data were extracted and analyzed by the Stata15.0 random effects model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen RCTs including 1315 participants were included in the analysis. The studies were found to be heterogeneous (<em>I</em><sup>2</sup> =86.2, <em>P</em> = 0.000), and thus a random effects model was used to combine the data. The results showed that traditional Chinese exercises had potentially beneficial effects on reducing pain (SMD =−0.66,95% CI [−1.08, −0.25], <em>P</em> = 0.002), improving sleep (SMD = −0.35,95% CI [−0.68,0. 01], <em>P</em> = 0.041) and relieving depression (SMD= −0.24,95% CI [−0.47, −0.02], <em>P</em> = 0.034) in FMS patients. However, no significant effects were found on improved quality of life (SMD =−0.20,95% CI [−0.48,0.09], <em>P</em> = 0.176).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TCEs can improve pain, sleep quality and depression in patients with FMS and are safe. However, they do not improve the quality of life significantly. Further large-scale, high-quality, and multi-center RCTs are required to verify the efficacy of TCEs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000074/pdfft?md5=fe67e4b0716245b8affccef40a79af9e&pid=1-s2.0-S0965229924000074-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of traditional Chinese exercises in fibromyalgia syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Hongshi Zhang , Xiaotu Zhang , Yidan Wang , Xuefeng Sun , Sixuan Li , Jindan Zhang , Jundong Jiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To explore the efficacy and safety of five traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to TCEs published from inception until February 2023. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to determine the combined effects of the intervention, and the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and Review 5.2 software were used to assess methodological quality. The data were extracted and analyzed by the Stata15.0 random effects model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen RCTs including 1315 participants were included in the analysis. The studies were found to be heterogeneous (<em>I</em><sup>2</sup> =86.2, <em>P</em> = 0.000), and thus a random effects model was used to combine the data. The results showed that traditional Chinese exercises had potentially beneficial effects on reducing pain (SMD =−0.66,95% CI [−1.08, −0.25], <em>P</em> = 0.002), improving sleep (SMD = −0.35,95% CI [−0.68,0. 01], <em>P</em> = 0.041) and relieving depression (SMD= −0.24,95% CI [−0.47, −0.02], <em>P</em> = 0.034) in FMS patients. However, no significant effects were found on improved quality of life (SMD =−0.20,95% CI [−0.48,0.09], <em>P</em> = 0.176).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TCEs can improve pain, sleep quality and depression in patients with FMS and are safe. However, they do not improve the quality of life significantly. Further large-scale, high-quality, and multi-center RCTs are required to verify the efficacy of TCEs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000074/pdfft?md5=fe67e4b0716245b8affccef40a79af9e&pid=1-s2.0-S0965229924000074-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨五种传统中医运动对纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)患者的疗效和安全性:探讨五种传统中医运动对纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)患者的疗效和安全性:方法:在PubMed、Embase、Scopus、ProQuest、Web of Science、Cochrane、CNKI、WanFang和VIP数据库中全面检索了从开始到2023年2月发表的与TCE相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)确定干预的综合效果,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具和Review 5.2软件评估方法学质量。采用Stata15.0随机效应模型对数据进行提取和分析:结果:19 项 RCT(包括 1315 名参与者)被纳入分析。发现这些研究存在异质性(I2=86.2,P=0.000),因此采用随机效应模型对数据进行合并。结果显示,传统中医运动对FMS患者减轻疼痛(SMD=-0.66,95% CI [-1.08, -0.25],P=0.002)、改善睡眠(SMD=-0.35,95% CI [-0.68, 0.01],P=0.041)和缓解抑郁(SMD=-0.24,95% CI [-0.47, -0.02],P=0.034)有潜在的有益作用。然而,在改善生活质量方面没有发现明显效果(SMD=-0.20,95% CI [-0.48,0.09],n=16,P=0.176):TCEs可以改善FMS患者的疼痛、睡眠质量和抑郁,并且是安全的。结论:TCEs 可以改善 FMS 患者的疼痛、睡眠质量和抑郁,并且是安全的。需要进一步开展大规模、高质量和多中心的 RCT 研究,以验证 TCEs 的疗效。
Effects of traditional Chinese exercises in fibromyalgia syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Objectives
To explore the efficacy and safety of five traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).
Methods
The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to TCEs published from inception until February 2023. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to determine the combined effects of the intervention, and the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and Review 5.2 software were used to assess methodological quality. The data were extracted and analyzed by the Stata15.0 random effects model.
Results
Nineteen RCTs including 1315 participants were included in the analysis. The studies were found to be heterogeneous (I2 =86.2, P = 0.000), and thus a random effects model was used to combine the data. The results showed that traditional Chinese exercises had potentially beneficial effects on reducing pain (SMD =−0.66,95% CI [−1.08, −0.25], P = 0.002), improving sleep (SMD = −0.35,95% CI [−0.68,0. 01], P = 0.041) and relieving depression (SMD= −0.24,95% CI [−0.47, −0.02], P = 0.034) in FMS patients. However, no significant effects were found on improved quality of life (SMD =−0.20,95% CI [−0.48,0.09], P = 0.176).
Conclusions
TCEs can improve pain, sleep quality and depression in patients with FMS and are safe. However, they do not improve the quality of life significantly. Further large-scale, high-quality, and multi-center RCTs are required to verify the efficacy of TCEs.