单侧全膝关节置换术是否需要预防性术中输血?预防性异体或自体输血组与不输血组血液学数据和术后输血率的比较:初步回顾性队列研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Hee Jin Seon, Jimin Lee, Seo Kyeong Choi, Jae Ho Lee
{"title":"单侧全膝关节置换术是否需要预防性术中输血?预防性异体或自体输血组与不输血组血液学数据和术后输血率的比较:初步回顾性队列研究","authors":"Hee Jin Seon,&nbsp;Jimin Lee,&nbsp;Seo Kyeong Choi,&nbsp;Jae Ho Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.tracli.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine whether prophylactic intra-operative allogenic or autologous transfusion could prevent postoperative anemia and additional transfusion comparing to the control group without receiving any prophylactic intervention in unilateral total knee arthroplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This study included 711 patients who underwent unilateral TKA. They were divided into four groups: allogeneic transfusion group (group AL), autologous transfusion group (group AT), tranexamic acid group (group TA), and control group (group C). The primary outcome was rate of postoperative allogeneic blood transfusions. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, postoperative bleeding amount.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Groups AT and AL did not exhibit a significant reduction in postoperative allogenic blood transfusion rate compared to group C (28/108 vs. 20/108, <em>p</em> = 0.21 and 37/159 vs. 34/159, <em>p</em> = 0.78 respectively). However, group TA demonstrated a significantly lower rate of postoperative allogenic blood transfusions than group C (22/125 vs. 3/125, <em>p</em> = 0.0001). Postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were statistically higher in group TA than in group C. However, those levels in group AT and AL did not differ significantly from those of group C.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intra-operative prophylactic transfusions did not decrease postoperative anemia or additional postoperative transfusion compared to the control group in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. However, the group receiving tranexamic acid showed lower transfusion rate and higher levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23262,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is prophylactic intraoperative transfusion needed in unilateral total knee arthroplasty? Comparison of hematologic data and postoperative transfusion rate between a prophylactic allogenic or autologous transfusion group with a no-transfusion group: A preliminary retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Hee Jin Seon,&nbsp;Jimin Lee,&nbsp;Seo Kyeong Choi,&nbsp;Jae Ho Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tracli.2024.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine whether prophylactic intra-operative allogenic or autologous transfusion could prevent postoperative anemia and additional transfusion comparing to the control group without receiving any prophylactic intervention in unilateral total knee arthroplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This study included 711 patients who underwent unilateral TKA. They were divided into four groups: allogeneic transfusion group (group AL), autologous transfusion group (group AT), tranexamic acid group (group TA), and control group (group C). The primary outcome was rate of postoperative allogeneic blood transfusions. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, postoperative bleeding amount.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Groups AT and AL did not exhibit a significant reduction in postoperative allogenic blood transfusion rate compared to group C (28/108 vs. 20/108, <em>p</em> = 0.21 and 37/159 vs. 34/159, <em>p</em> = 0.78 respectively). However, group TA demonstrated a significantly lower rate of postoperative allogenic blood transfusions than group C (22/125 vs. 3/125, <em>p</em> = 0.0001). Postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were statistically higher in group TA than in group C. However, those levels in group AT and AL did not differ significantly from those of group C.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intra-operative prophylactic transfusions did not decrease postoperative anemia or additional postoperative transfusion compared to the control group in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. However, the group receiving tranexamic acid showed lower transfusion rate and higher levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246782024000016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246782024000016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料和方法 本研究纳入了 711 例接受单侧全膝关节置换术的患者,将其分为四组:异体输血组(AL 组)、自体输血组(AT 组)和对照组(C 组)。他们被分为四组:异体输血组(AL 组)、自体输血组(AT 组)、氨甲环酸组(TA 组)和对照组(C 组)。主要结果是术后异体输血率。结果与 C 组相比,AT 组和 AL 组的术后异体输血率没有显著降低(分别为 28/108 对 20/108,P = 0.21 和 37/159 对 34/159,P = 0.78)。不过,TA 组的术后异体输血率明显低于 C 组(22/125 对 3/125,P = 0.0001)。结论与对照组相比,术前预防性输血并不能减少全膝关节置换术患者术后贫血或术后额外输血。然而,接受氨甲环酸治疗的一组输血率较低,血红蛋白和血细胞比容水平较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is prophylactic intraoperative transfusion needed in unilateral total knee arthroplasty? Comparison of hematologic data and postoperative transfusion rate between a prophylactic allogenic or autologous transfusion group with a no-transfusion group: A preliminary retrospective cohort study

Objectives

To determine whether prophylactic intra-operative allogenic or autologous transfusion could prevent postoperative anemia and additional transfusion comparing to the control group without receiving any prophylactic intervention in unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Materials and methods

This study included 711 patients who underwent unilateral TKA. They were divided into four groups: allogeneic transfusion group (group AL), autologous transfusion group (group AT), tranexamic acid group (group TA), and control group (group C). The primary outcome was rate of postoperative allogeneic blood transfusions. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, postoperative bleeding amount.

Results

Groups AT and AL did not exhibit a significant reduction in postoperative allogenic blood transfusion rate compared to group C (28/108 vs. 20/108, p = 0.21 and 37/159 vs. 34/159, p = 0.78 respectively). However, group TA demonstrated a significantly lower rate of postoperative allogenic blood transfusions than group C (22/125 vs. 3/125, p = 0.0001). Postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were statistically higher in group TA than in group C. However, those levels in group AT and AL did not differ significantly from those of group C.

Conclusion

Intra-operative prophylactic transfusions did not decrease postoperative anemia or additional postoperative transfusion compared to the control group in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. However, the group receiving tranexamic acid showed lower transfusion rate and higher levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, the official journal of the French Society of Blood Transfusion (SFTS): - an aid to training, at a European level - the only French journal indexed in the hematology and immunology sections of Current Contents Transfusion Clinique et Biologique spans fundamental research and everyday practice, with articles coming from both sides. Articles, reviews, case reports, letters to the editor and editorials are published in 4 editions a year, in French or in English, covering all scientific and medical aspects of transfusion: immunology, hematology, infectious diseases, genetics, molecular biology, etc. And finally, a convivial cross-disciplinary section on training and information offers practical updates. Readership: "Transfusers" are many and various: anesthetists, biologists, hematologists, and blood-bank, ICU and mobile emergency specialists...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信