Navleen Kaur Bhatia, Vinay Kumar Chugh, Sam Prasanth Shankar, Ritvik Vinay A P, Surjit Singh, Priyawati Moungkhom, Rinkle Sardana
{"title":"使用传统弓丝和铜镍钛弓丝进行矫治后的矫治效率和牙根吸收的三维评估:随机对照试验。","authors":"Navleen Kaur Bhatia, Vinay Kumar Chugh, Sam Prasanth Shankar, Ritvik Vinay A P, Surjit Singh, Priyawati Moungkhom, Rinkle Sardana","doi":"10.1590/2177-6709.28.6.e2323177.oar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare alignment efficiency and root resorption between nickel-titanium (NiTi) and copper-nickel-titanium (CuNiTi) archwires after complete alignment in mandibular anterior region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this two-arm parallel single-blind randomized controlled trial, forty-four patients with Class I malocclusion with mandibular anterior crowding were recruited form orthodontic clinic of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Jodhpur, India). Patients were randomly allocated into NiTi and CuNiTi groups, with a 1:1 allocation. Alignment was performed using 0.014-in, 0.016-in, 0.018-in, 0.019x0.025-in archwire sequence in the respective groups, which terminated in 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless-steel working archwire. The primary outcome was alignment efficiency, measured on study models from baseline (T0) to the first, second, third, fourth and fifth-month (T5). Secondary outcome was root resorption, measured from CBCT scans taken at T0 and T5. Mixed-factorial ANOVA was used to compare Little's Irregularity Index (LII). For assessing the proportion of patients with complete alignment at the end of each month, Kaplan-Meier survival curve was built and time to treatment completion was compared between groups using log rank test. Paired t-test was used to assess external apical root resorption (EARR) within groups, whereas independent t-test was used to evaluate LII and EARR between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were recruited in each group. One patient was lost to follow-up in the CuNiTi group. No statistically significant differences were observed in alignment efficiency between the groups (p>0.05). Intergroup comparison revealed that the changes in root measurement in three-dimensions were not statistically significant (p>0.05), except for mandibular right central incisor, which showed increased resorption at root apex in NiTi group (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two alignment archwires showed similar rate of alignment at all time points. Root resorption measurement did not differ between the NiTi and CuNiTi groups, except for the mandibular right central incisor, which showed more resorption in NiTi group.</p>","PeriodicalId":38720,"journal":{"name":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"28 6","pages":"e2323177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alignment efficiency and three-dimensional assessment of root resorption after alignment with conventional and copper-nickel-titanium archwires: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Navleen Kaur Bhatia, Vinay Kumar Chugh, Sam Prasanth Shankar, Ritvik Vinay A P, Surjit Singh, Priyawati Moungkhom, Rinkle Sardana\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2177-6709.28.6.e2323177.oar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare alignment efficiency and root resorption between nickel-titanium (NiTi) and copper-nickel-titanium (CuNiTi) archwires after complete alignment in mandibular anterior region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this two-arm parallel single-blind randomized controlled trial, forty-four patients with Class I malocclusion with mandibular anterior crowding were recruited form orthodontic clinic of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Jodhpur, India). Patients were randomly allocated into NiTi and CuNiTi groups, with a 1:1 allocation. Alignment was performed using 0.014-in, 0.016-in, 0.018-in, 0.019x0.025-in archwire sequence in the respective groups, which terminated in 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless-steel working archwire. The primary outcome was alignment efficiency, measured on study models from baseline (T0) to the first, second, third, fourth and fifth-month (T5). Secondary outcome was root resorption, measured from CBCT scans taken at T0 and T5. Mixed-factorial ANOVA was used to compare Little's Irregularity Index (LII). For assessing the proportion of patients with complete alignment at the end of each month, Kaplan-Meier survival curve was built and time to treatment completion was compared between groups using log rank test. Paired t-test was used to assess external apical root resorption (EARR) within groups, whereas independent t-test was used to evaluate LII and EARR between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were recruited in each group. One patient was lost to follow-up in the CuNiTi group. No statistically significant differences were observed in alignment efficiency between the groups (p>0.05). Intergroup comparison revealed that the changes in root measurement in three-dimensions were not statistically significant (p>0.05), except for mandibular right central incisor, which showed increased resorption at root apex in NiTi group (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two alignment archwires showed similar rate of alignment at all time points. Root resorption measurement did not differ between the NiTi and CuNiTi groups, except for the mandibular right central incisor, which showed more resorption in NiTi group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"28 6\",\"pages\":\"e2323177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773444/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.6.e2323177.oar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.6.e2323177.oar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较镍钛(NiTi)和铜镍钛(CuNiTi)弓丝在下颌前牙区完全矫治后的矫治效率和牙根吸收情况:在这项双臂平行单盲随机对照试验中,全印度医学科学研究所(印度焦特普尔)正畸诊所招募了 44 名下颌前牙拥挤的 I 类错牙合畸形患者。患者被随机分配到镍钛组和铜镍钛组,分配比例为 1:1。各组分别使用 0.014 英寸、0.016 英寸、0.018 英寸、0.019x0.025 英寸的弓丝序列进行排列,最后使用 0.019 x 0.025 英寸的不锈钢工作弓丝。主要结果是排列效率,在研究模型上测量从基线(T0)到第一、第二、第三、第四和第五个月(T5)的排列效率。次要结果是牙根吸收,根据 T0 和 T5 时的 CBCT 扫描结果进行测量。混合因子方差分析用于比较利特尔不规则指数(LII)。为评估每个月末完全对齐的患者比例,建立了卡普兰-梅耶生存曲线,并使用对数秩检验比较各组间完成治疗的时间。组内采用配对 t 检验评估外根吸收(EARR),组间采用独立 t 检验评估 LII 和 EARR:各组均招募了 22 名患者。结果:各组均招募了 22 名患者,其中铜镍钛组有一名患者失去了随访机会。各组间对线效率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。组间比较显示,除了下颌右中切牙的根尖吸收在镍钛组有所增加外,其他牙根三维测量的变化均无统计学意义(p>0.05):两种对齐弓丝在所有时间点的对齐率相似。镍钛组和铜镍钛组的牙根吸收测量结果没有差异,但下颌右中切牙除外,镍钛组的牙根吸收更多。
Alignment efficiency and three-dimensional assessment of root resorption after alignment with conventional and copper-nickel-titanium archwires: A randomized controlled trial.
Objective: To compare alignment efficiency and root resorption between nickel-titanium (NiTi) and copper-nickel-titanium (CuNiTi) archwires after complete alignment in mandibular anterior region.
Methods: In this two-arm parallel single-blind randomized controlled trial, forty-four patients with Class I malocclusion with mandibular anterior crowding were recruited form orthodontic clinic of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Jodhpur, India). Patients were randomly allocated into NiTi and CuNiTi groups, with a 1:1 allocation. Alignment was performed using 0.014-in, 0.016-in, 0.018-in, 0.019x0.025-in archwire sequence in the respective groups, which terminated in 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless-steel working archwire. The primary outcome was alignment efficiency, measured on study models from baseline (T0) to the first, second, third, fourth and fifth-month (T5). Secondary outcome was root resorption, measured from CBCT scans taken at T0 and T5. Mixed-factorial ANOVA was used to compare Little's Irregularity Index (LII). For assessing the proportion of patients with complete alignment at the end of each month, Kaplan-Meier survival curve was built and time to treatment completion was compared between groups using log rank test. Paired t-test was used to assess external apical root resorption (EARR) within groups, whereas independent t-test was used to evaluate LII and EARR between the groups.
Results: Twenty-two patients were recruited in each group. One patient was lost to follow-up in the CuNiTi group. No statistically significant differences were observed in alignment efficiency between the groups (p>0.05). Intergroup comparison revealed that the changes in root measurement in three-dimensions were not statistically significant (p>0.05), except for mandibular right central incisor, which showed increased resorption at root apex in NiTi group (p<0.01).
Conclusion: The two alignment archwires showed similar rate of alignment at all time points. Root resorption measurement did not differ between the NiTi and CuNiTi groups, except for the mandibular right central incisor, which showed more resorption in NiTi group.
期刊介绍:
The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics publishes scientific research articles, significant reviews, clinical and technical case reports, brief communications, and other materials related to Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics.