Marco Falcone, Mirko Preto, Afonso Ribeiro Morgado, Ioannis Sokolakis, Selçuk Sarıkaya, Marco Capece, Paolo Capogrosso, Celeste Manfredi, Georgios Tsampoukas, Giorgio Russo
{"title":"阴茎假体植入过程中保留阴茎长度技术的风险和益处：青年泌尿科医师性与生殖健康工作小组的系统性综述。","authors":"Marco Falcone, Mirko Preto, Afonso Ribeiro Morgado, Ioannis Sokolakis, Selçuk Sarıkaya, Marco Capece, Paolo Capogrosso, Celeste Manfredi, Georgios Tsampoukas, Giorgio Russo","doi":"10.1177/17562872231215177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Penile shortening, frequently resulting from end-stage Peyronie's disease (PD), has a negative impact on patients' sexual activity and overall quality of life, especially when accompanied by Erectile dysfunction (ED). Various surgical techniques have been described to manage concomitant ED and penile shortening through penile prosthesis (PP) implantation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the benefits and risks of different penile length preservation techniques during PP implantation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review of the available literature on the use of penile length preservation maneuvers in conjunction with PP implantation was conducted.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>For this systematic review, three databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) and clinical trial.gov were queried for relevant publications from 1 January 1990 to 1 September 2022. The review process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative analysis included 15 relevant articles involving 1186 adult patients who underwent penile length preservation techniques during PP implantation. Penile lengthening of 1-7 cm was reported. Overall, postoperative complications were described in up to 21.7% of cases. Only five studies reported functional outcomes, showing a significant improvement in postoperative period based on the administered questionnaire (e.g. IIEF - International Index of Erectile Function, EDITS - Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Penile length preservation procedures appear to offer a viable option for managing acquired penile shortening, particularly in cases of PD. However, they are associated with a significant risk of complications. Proper patient selection, thorough discussion of risks and benefits, and referral to high-volume centers are mandatory to achieve optimal outcomes and minimizing complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO database registration CRD42022360758.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562872231215177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk and benefits of penile length preservation techniques during penile prosthesis implantation: a systematic review by the young academic urologists sexual and reproductive health working group.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Falcone, Mirko Preto, Afonso Ribeiro Morgado, Ioannis Sokolakis, Selçuk Sarıkaya, Marco Capece, Paolo Capogrosso, Celeste Manfredi, Georgios Tsampoukas, Giorgio Russo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562872231215177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Penile shortening, frequently resulting from end-stage Peyronie's disease (PD), has a negative impact on patients' sexual activity and overall quality of life, especially when accompanied by Erectile dysfunction (ED). Various surgical techniques have been described to manage concomitant ED and penile shortening through penile prosthesis (PP) implantation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the benefits and risks of different penile length preservation techniques during PP implantation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review of the available literature on the use of penile length preservation maneuvers in conjunction with PP implantation was conducted.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>For this systematic review, three databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) and clinical trial.gov were queried for relevant publications from 1 January 1990 to 1 September 2022. The review process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative analysis included 15 relevant articles involving 1186 adult patients who underwent penile length preservation techniques during PP implantation. Penile lengthening of 1-7 cm was reported. Overall, postoperative complications were described in up to 21.7% of cases. Only five studies reported functional outcomes, showing a significant improvement in postoperative period based on the administered questionnaire (e.g. IIEF - International Index of Erectile Function, EDITS - Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Penile length preservation procedures appear to offer a viable option for managing acquired penile shortening, particularly in cases of PD. However, they are associated with a significant risk of complications. Proper patient selection, thorough discussion of risks and benefits, and referral to high-volume centers are mandatory to achieve optimal outcomes and minimizing complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO database registration CRD42022360758.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Urology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"17562872231215177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775725/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872231215177\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872231215177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk and benefits of penile length preservation techniques during penile prosthesis implantation: a systematic review by the young academic urologists sexual and reproductive health working group.
Background: Penile shortening, frequently resulting from end-stage Peyronie's disease (PD), has a negative impact on patients' sexual activity and overall quality of life, especially when accompanied by Erectile dysfunction (ED). Various surgical techniques have been described to manage concomitant ED and penile shortening through penile prosthesis (PP) implantation.
Objectives: To evaluate the benefits and risks of different penile length preservation techniques during PP implantation.
Design: A systematic review of the available literature on the use of penile length preservation maneuvers in conjunction with PP implantation was conducted.
Data sources and methods: For this systematic review, three databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) and clinical trial.gov were queried for relevant publications from 1 January 1990 to 1 September 2022. The review process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.
Results: The qualitative analysis included 15 relevant articles involving 1186 adult patients who underwent penile length preservation techniques during PP implantation. Penile lengthening of 1-7 cm was reported. Overall, postoperative complications were described in up to 21.7% of cases. Only five studies reported functional outcomes, showing a significant improvement in postoperative period based on the administered questionnaire (e.g. IIEF - International Index of Erectile Function, EDITS - Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction).
Conclusion: Penile length preservation procedures appear to offer a viable option for managing acquired penile shortening, particularly in cases of PD. However, they are associated with a significant risk of complications. Proper patient selection, thorough discussion of risks and benefits, and referral to high-volume centers are mandatory to achieve optimal outcomes and minimizing complications.
期刊介绍：
Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology.
The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
