应用人工智能预测超声乳腺肿块的恶性风险。

Q3 Medicine
Mariah Carneiro Wanderley, Cândida Maria Alves Soares, Marina Marcondes Moreira Morais, Rachel Malheiros Cruz, Isadora Ribeiro Monteiro Lima, Rubens Chojniak, Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt
{"title":"应用人工智能预测超声乳腺肿块的恶性风险。","authors":"Mariah Carneiro Wanderley, Cândida Maria Alves Soares, Marina Marcondes Moreira Morais, Rachel Malheiros Cruz, Isadora Ribeiro Monteiro Lima, Rubens Chojniak, Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt","doi":"10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the results obtained with an artificial intelligence-based software for predicting the risk of malignancy in breast masses from ultrasound images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center study evaluating 555 breast masses submitted to percutaneous biopsy at a cancer referral center. Ultrasonographic findings were classified in accordance with the BI-RADS lexicon. The images were analyzed by using Koios DS Breast software and classified as benign, probably benign, low to intermediate suspicion, high suspicion, or probably malignant. The histological classification was considered the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 51 years, and the mean mass size was 16 mm. The radiologist evaluation had a sensitivity and specificity of 99.1% and 34.0%, respectively, compared with 98.2% and 39.0%, respectively, for the software evaluation. The positive predictive value for malignancy for the BI-RADS categories was similar between the radiologist and software evaluations. Two false-negative results were identified in the radiologist evaluation, the masses in question being classified as suspicious by the software, whereas four false-negative results were identified in the software evaluation, the masses in question being classified as suspicious by the radiologist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our sample, the performance of artificial intelligence-based software was comparable to that of a radiologist.</p>","PeriodicalId":20842,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Brasileira","volume":"56 5","pages":"229-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of artificial intelligence in predicting malignancy risk in breast masses on ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"Mariah Carneiro Wanderley, Cândida Maria Alves Soares, Marina Marcondes Moreira Morais, Rachel Malheiros Cruz, Isadora Ribeiro Monteiro Lima, Rubens Chojniak, Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the results obtained with an artificial intelligence-based software for predicting the risk of malignancy in breast masses from ultrasound images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center study evaluating 555 breast masses submitted to percutaneous biopsy at a cancer referral center. Ultrasonographic findings were classified in accordance with the BI-RADS lexicon. The images were analyzed by using Koios DS Breast software and classified as benign, probably benign, low to intermediate suspicion, high suspicion, or probably malignant. The histological classification was considered the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 51 years, and the mean mass size was 16 mm. The radiologist evaluation had a sensitivity and specificity of 99.1% and 34.0%, respectively, compared with 98.2% and 39.0%, respectively, for the software evaluation. The positive predictive value for malignancy for the BI-RADS categories was similar between the radiologist and software evaluations. Two false-negative results were identified in the radiologist evaluation, the masses in question being classified as suspicious by the software, whereas four false-negative results were identified in the software evaluation, the masses in question being classified as suspicious by the radiologist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our sample, the performance of artificial intelligence-based software was comparable to that of a radiologist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"229-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775818/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估基于人工智能的软件从超声图像预测乳腺肿块恶性风险的结果:这是一项回顾性单中心研究,评估了一家癌症转诊中心接受经皮活检的 555 例乳腺肿块。根据 BI-RADS 术语表对超声检查结果进行了分类。使用 Koios DS Breast 软件对图像进行分析,并将其分为良性、可能良性、中低度可疑、高度可疑或可能恶性。组织学分类被视为参考标准:患者的平均年龄为 51 岁,肿块的平均大小为 16 毫米。放射科医生评估的敏感性和特异性分别为 99.1%和 34.0%,而软件评估的敏感性和特异性分别为 98.2%和 39.0%。放射科医生和软件评估对 BI-RADS 类别中恶性肿瘤的阳性预测值相似。在放射科医生评估中发现了两个假阴性结果,相关肿块被软件归类为可疑肿块,而在软件评估中发现了四个假阴性结果,相关肿块被放射科医生归类为可疑肿块:结论:在我们的样本中,人工智能软件的性能与放射科医生的性能相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of artificial intelligence in predicting malignancy risk in breast masses on ultrasound.

Objective: To evaluate the results obtained with an artificial intelligence-based software for predicting the risk of malignancy in breast masses from ultrasound images.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study evaluating 555 breast masses submitted to percutaneous biopsy at a cancer referral center. Ultrasonographic findings were classified in accordance with the BI-RADS lexicon. The images were analyzed by using Koios DS Breast software and classified as benign, probably benign, low to intermediate suspicion, high suspicion, or probably malignant. The histological classification was considered the reference standard.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 51 years, and the mean mass size was 16 mm. The radiologist evaluation had a sensitivity and specificity of 99.1% and 34.0%, respectively, compared with 98.2% and 39.0%, respectively, for the software evaluation. The positive predictive value for malignancy for the BI-RADS categories was similar between the radiologist and software evaluations. Two false-negative results were identified in the radiologist evaluation, the masses in question being classified as suspicious by the software, whereas four false-negative results were identified in the software evaluation, the masses in question being classified as suspicious by the radiologist.

Conclusion: In our sample, the performance of artificial intelligence-based software was comparable to that of a radiologist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Brasileira
Radiologia Brasileira Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信