假体周围关节感染的经验性抗生素治疗:荷兰全国调查。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
R Scholten, P M C Klein Klouwenberg, J L C VAN Susante, M P Somford
{"title":"假体周围关节感染的经验性抗生素治疗:荷兰全国调查。","authors":"R Scholten, P M C Klein Klouwenberg, J L C VAN Susante, M P Somford","doi":"10.52628/89.4.9415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is generally treated by means of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Subsequently, empiric antibiotic therapy is commenced directly after surgery which is important for the successful treatment of PJI. The aim of this study is to evaluate current nationwide empiric antibiotic treatment regimens for PJI in the Netherlands. An electronic 15-question survey addressing the empiric antibiotic treatment strategy for PJI following THA or TKA was sent to orthopaedic surgeons in all Dutch hospitals in April 2019. Orthopaedic surgeons active in every single Dutch orthopaedic hospital (n=69) were approached. At least one surgeon in every hospital completed the survey (100% response rate). A protocol dictating the empiric antibiotic treatment following DAIR was used in 87% (60 hospitals). Among all hospitals, 72% (50 hospitals) used antibiotic monotherapy and 28% (19 hospitals) used combination therapy. Cefazolin was the most commonly used regimen in centres opting for monotherapy (42%, 29 hospitals). Similar regimens were used for the empiric treatment of suspected early PJI after revision surgery and for acute hematogenous PJI. In septic patients, combination therapy was preferred (64%). 81% (56 hospitals) incubated tissue biopsies for a minimum of 10 days whereas 16% (9 hospitals) indicated an incubation period of 7 days or less. Even in a small country such as the Netherlands there seems to be no uniformity regarding empiric antibiotic treatment for PJI. Increased uniformity regarding empiric treatment could be an important first step in improving PJI treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"89 4","pages":"665-669"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empiric antibiotic treatment for periprosthetic joint infections: a national survey in The Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"R Scholten, P M C Klein Klouwenberg, J L C VAN Susante, M P Somford\",\"doi\":\"10.52628/89.4.9415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is generally treated by means of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Subsequently, empiric antibiotic therapy is commenced directly after surgery which is important for the successful treatment of PJI. The aim of this study is to evaluate current nationwide empiric antibiotic treatment regimens for PJI in the Netherlands. An electronic 15-question survey addressing the empiric antibiotic treatment strategy for PJI following THA or TKA was sent to orthopaedic surgeons in all Dutch hospitals in April 2019. Orthopaedic surgeons active in every single Dutch orthopaedic hospital (n=69) were approached. At least one surgeon in every hospital completed the survey (100% response rate). A protocol dictating the empiric antibiotic treatment following DAIR was used in 87% (60 hospitals). Among all hospitals, 72% (50 hospitals) used antibiotic monotherapy and 28% (19 hospitals) used combination therapy. Cefazolin was the most commonly used regimen in centres opting for monotherapy (42%, 29 hospitals). Similar regimens were used for the empiric treatment of suspected early PJI after revision surgery and for acute hematogenous PJI. In septic patients, combination therapy was preferred (64%). 81% (56 hospitals) incubated tissue biopsies for a minimum of 10 days whereas 16% (9 hospitals) indicated an incubation period of 7 days or less. Even in a small country such as the Netherlands there seems to be no uniformity regarding empiric antibiotic treatment for PJI. Increased uniformity regarding empiric treatment could be an important first step in improving PJI treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"89 4\",\"pages\":\"665-669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.4.9415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.4.9415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期假体周围关节感染(PJI)通常采用清创、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)的方法进行治疗。随后,在手术后直接开始经验性抗生素治疗,这对成功治疗 PJI 非常重要。本研究旨在评估目前荷兰全国范围内针对 PJI 的经验性抗生素治疗方案。2019 年 4 月,一项针对 THA 或 TKA 术后 PJI 经验性抗生素治疗策略的 15 个问题的电子调查被发送给荷兰所有医院的骨科医生。调查对象包括荷兰所有骨科医院的骨科医生(n=69)。每家医院至少有一名外科医生完成了调查(回复率 100%)。87%的医院(60 家)采用了 DAIR 后经验性抗生素治疗方案。在所有医院中,72%(50 家医院)采用单一抗生素疗法,28%(19 家医院)采用联合疗法。在选择单一疗法的医院中,头孢唑啉是最常用的疗法(42%,29 家医院)。对于翻修手术后疑似早期 PJI 和急性血源性 PJI 的经验性治疗,也采用了类似的方案。脓毒症患者首选联合疗法(64%)。81%的医院(56 家)将组织活检样本培养至少 10 天,而 16%的医院(9 家)表示培养期为 7 天或更短。即使在荷兰这样的小国,PJI 的经验性抗生素治疗似乎也不统一。提高经验性治疗的统一性可能是改善 PJI 治疗的重要第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empiric antibiotic treatment for periprosthetic joint infections: a national survey in The Netherlands.

Early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is generally treated by means of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Subsequently, empiric antibiotic therapy is commenced directly after surgery which is important for the successful treatment of PJI. The aim of this study is to evaluate current nationwide empiric antibiotic treatment regimens for PJI in the Netherlands. An electronic 15-question survey addressing the empiric antibiotic treatment strategy for PJI following THA or TKA was sent to orthopaedic surgeons in all Dutch hospitals in April 2019. Orthopaedic surgeons active in every single Dutch orthopaedic hospital (n=69) were approached. At least one surgeon in every hospital completed the survey (100% response rate). A protocol dictating the empiric antibiotic treatment following DAIR was used in 87% (60 hospitals). Among all hospitals, 72% (50 hospitals) used antibiotic monotherapy and 28% (19 hospitals) used combination therapy. Cefazolin was the most commonly used regimen in centres opting for monotherapy (42%, 29 hospitals). Similar regimens were used for the empiric treatment of suspected early PJI after revision surgery and for acute hematogenous PJI. In septic patients, combination therapy was preferred (64%). 81% (56 hospitals) incubated tissue biopsies for a minimum of 10 days whereas 16% (9 hospitals) indicated an incubation period of 7 days or less. Even in a small country such as the Netherlands there seems to be no uniformity regarding empiric antibiotic treatment for PJI. Increased uniformity regarding empiric treatment could be an important first step in improving PJI treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信