C 反应蛋白 (CRP) 和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值 (NLR) 是成功进行两阶段假体关节感染治疗的预测指标吗?

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
M Ecki, H Poilvache, M Randy Buzisa, M VAN Cauter, H Rodriguez-Villalobos, J-C Yombi, O Cornu
{"title":"C 反应蛋白 (CRP) 和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值 (NLR) 是成功进行两阶段假体关节感染治疗的预测指标吗?","authors":"M Ecki, H Poilvache, M Randy Buzisa, M VAN Cauter, H Rodriguez-Villalobos, J-C Yombi, O Cornu","doi":"10.52628/89.4.11123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) regularly involves a two-stage surgical strategy. The second stage is generally performed when the surgeon estimates that the infection is under control based on either the treatment length or clinical and biological data. We have raised the question whether standardization of C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) values could be either indicative of infection control or predictive of infection recurrence. This was an analytical retrospective and monocentric cross-sectional observational study. The CRP and NLR values were recorded prior to the second-stage surgery in a sample of 100 patients who underwent a two-stage revision arthroplasty following a PJI, and these values were correlated with the absence of infectious recurrence within a 2-year follow-up. The statistical analysis consisted of evaluating the diagnostic validity of each marker, first individually, and then in combination. CRP was shown associated with a 68% sensitivity, 40% specificity, 27% positive predictive value (PPV), and 79% negative predictive value (NPV). The ROC curve was 51.1%. The NLR displayed a 12% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 27% PPV, and 75% NPV. The ROC curve was 47.9%. The combination of the two markers did not fundamentally improve the statistical results, with only a 43% concordance of the two markers, 27% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 37% PPV, and 77% NPV. Measuring CRP and NLR values, either individually or in combination, before the second-stage revision arthroplasty did not turn out to be predictive of either infection recurrence or cure within two years of follow-up. Therefore, an absolute test is still lacking, which would enable us to predict without failure the absence of control or the control of a PJI before or after second-stage revision. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cross-sectional study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"89 4","pages":"659-664"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predictive markers of successful two-stage prosthetic joint infection management?\",\"authors\":\"M Ecki, H Poilvache, M Randy Buzisa, M VAN Cauter, H Rodriguez-Villalobos, J-C Yombi, O Cornu\",\"doi\":\"10.52628/89.4.11123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) regularly involves a two-stage surgical strategy. The second stage is generally performed when the surgeon estimates that the infection is under control based on either the treatment length or clinical and biological data. We have raised the question whether standardization of C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) values could be either indicative of infection control or predictive of infection recurrence. This was an analytical retrospective and monocentric cross-sectional observational study. The CRP and NLR values were recorded prior to the second-stage surgery in a sample of 100 patients who underwent a two-stage revision arthroplasty following a PJI, and these values were correlated with the absence of infectious recurrence within a 2-year follow-up. The statistical analysis consisted of evaluating the diagnostic validity of each marker, first individually, and then in combination. CRP was shown associated with a 68% sensitivity, 40% specificity, 27% positive predictive value (PPV), and 79% negative predictive value (NPV). The ROC curve was 51.1%. The NLR displayed a 12% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 27% PPV, and 75% NPV. The ROC curve was 47.9%. The combination of the two markers did not fundamentally improve the statistical results, with only a 43% concordance of the two markers, 27% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 37% PPV, and 77% NPV. Measuring CRP and NLR values, either individually or in combination, before the second-stage revision arthroplasty did not turn out to be predictive of either infection recurrence or cure within two years of follow-up. Therefore, an absolute test is still lacking, which would enable us to predict without failure the absence of control or the control of a PJI before or after second-stage revision. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cross-sectional study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"89 4\",\"pages\":\"659-664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.4.11123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.4.11123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工关节感染(PJI)的治疗通常包括两个阶段的手术策略。第二阶段一般在外科医生根据治疗时间或临床和生物学数据估计感染已得到控制时进行。我们提出了一个问题:C反应蛋白(CRP)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)的标准化值是否可以指示感染控制或预测感染复发。这是一项分析性回顾和单中心横断面观察研究。研究记录了 100 例在 PJI 后接受两阶段翻修关节成形术的患者在第二阶段手术前的 CRP 和 NLR 值,并将这些值与 2 年随访期间无感染复发相关联。统计分析包括评估每个标记物的诊断有效性,首先是单独评估,然后是联合评估。结果显示,CRP 的敏感性为 68%,特异性为 40%,阳性预测值为 27%,阴性预测值为 79%。ROC 曲线为 51.1%。NLR 显示出 12% 的灵敏度、89% 的特异性、27% 的 PPV 和 75% 的 NPV。ROC 曲线为 47.9%。两种标记物的结合并未从根本上改善统计结果,两种标记物的一致性仅为 43%,灵敏度为 27%,特异性为 84%,PPV 为 37%,NPV 为 77%。在二期翻修关节置换术前单独或联合测量 CRP 和 NLR 值并不能预测两年内的感染复发或治愈。因此,我们仍然缺乏一种绝对的检测方法,使我们能够在第二阶段翻修手术之前或之后,准确无误地预测PJI是否得到控制或控制。证据等级:三级,回顾性横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predictive markers of successful two-stage prosthetic joint infection management?

The treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) regularly involves a two-stage surgical strategy. The second stage is generally performed when the surgeon estimates that the infection is under control based on either the treatment length or clinical and biological data. We have raised the question whether standardization of C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) values could be either indicative of infection control or predictive of infection recurrence. This was an analytical retrospective and monocentric cross-sectional observational study. The CRP and NLR values were recorded prior to the second-stage surgery in a sample of 100 patients who underwent a two-stage revision arthroplasty following a PJI, and these values were correlated with the absence of infectious recurrence within a 2-year follow-up. The statistical analysis consisted of evaluating the diagnostic validity of each marker, first individually, and then in combination. CRP was shown associated with a 68% sensitivity, 40% specificity, 27% positive predictive value (PPV), and 79% negative predictive value (NPV). The ROC curve was 51.1%. The NLR displayed a 12% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 27% PPV, and 75% NPV. The ROC curve was 47.9%. The combination of the two markers did not fundamentally improve the statistical results, with only a 43% concordance of the two markers, 27% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 37% PPV, and 77% NPV. Measuring CRP and NLR values, either individually or in combination, before the second-stage revision arthroplasty did not turn out to be predictive of either infection recurrence or cure within two years of follow-up. Therefore, an absolute test is still lacking, which would enable us to predict without failure the absence of control or the control of a PJI before or after second-stage revision. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cross-sectional study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信