金属纤维层压板的生命周期评估:生态设计方法

IF 5.3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Guilherme Germano Braga , Gabriela Giusti , Júlio César dos Santos , Diogo Aparecido Lopes Silva , André Luis Christoforo , Túlio Hallak Panzera , Fabrizio Scarpa
{"title":"金属纤维层压板的生命周期评估:生态设计方法","authors":"Guilherme Germano Braga ,&nbsp;Gabriela Giusti ,&nbsp;Júlio César dos Santos ,&nbsp;Diogo Aparecido Lopes Silva ,&nbsp;André Luis Christoforo ,&nbsp;Túlio Hallak Panzera ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Scarpa","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the extensive research on renewable resources (RR) and their potential applications in composite materials and sandwich structures, there remains a significant dearth of life cycle assessment (LCA) studies that comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of RR in mitigating environmental impacts (EI). To bridge this gap, the present study aims to investigate twelve different designs of sandwich panels, specifically referred to as Fibre Metal Laminates (FML). These FML combine aluminium skins (2024-T3 and 1200-H14), polymer matrices (Epoxy, Polyester, and Castor oil Bio-PU), natural fibres (Sisal, Coir, and <em>Cynodon spp</em>.), surface treatments for aluminium skins (sanding, NaOH, and Washprimer), and treatments for natural fibres (Ground, NaOH-treatment and untreated). A cradle-to-gate LCA is conducted, and the inventories are modelled using the OpenLCA 1.6.3 and ecoinvent 3.9 cut-off regionalized database. EI are evaluated in twelve categories, including climate change, fossil and nuclear energy use, freshwater (acidification, ecotoxicity and eutrophication), human toxicity (cancer and non-cancer), mineral resources use, ozone layer depletion, particulate matter formation, photochemical oxidant formation, and terrestrial acidification. Impact World+ method for Latin America version 1.251 is employed to calculate EI. Nine Eco-efficiency indicators and trade-off analyses are evaluated to gain insights into design decision outcomes. Among the various panels considered, FML12, manufactured with aluminium alloy 1200-H14 treated only with sanding, castor oil biopolymer and untreated coir fibres, present the most consistent eco-efficiency indicators. The reference scenario considers the average characteristics of FML (both environmental and mechanical) for trade-off analysis. Despite the fifty percent chance of better performance, FML12 is the only panel that shows higher mechanical performance and lower EI compared to the reference scenario. The importance of this article lies in the novel results obtained using the proposed eco-efficiency indicators, which can be expanded in further studies on the topic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34525,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part C Open Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024000069/pdfft?md5=c116e0bbdb1f3bed69068da9edf9a407&pid=1-s2.0-S2666682024000069-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment of fibre metal laminates: An ecodesign approach\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Germano Braga ,&nbsp;Gabriela Giusti ,&nbsp;Júlio César dos Santos ,&nbsp;Diogo Aparecido Lopes Silva ,&nbsp;André Luis Christoforo ,&nbsp;Túlio Hallak Panzera ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Scarpa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the extensive research on renewable resources (RR) and their potential applications in composite materials and sandwich structures, there remains a significant dearth of life cycle assessment (LCA) studies that comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of RR in mitigating environmental impacts (EI). To bridge this gap, the present study aims to investigate twelve different designs of sandwich panels, specifically referred to as Fibre Metal Laminates (FML). These FML combine aluminium skins (2024-T3 and 1200-H14), polymer matrices (Epoxy, Polyester, and Castor oil Bio-PU), natural fibres (Sisal, Coir, and <em>Cynodon spp</em>.), surface treatments for aluminium skins (sanding, NaOH, and Washprimer), and treatments for natural fibres (Ground, NaOH-treatment and untreated). A cradle-to-gate LCA is conducted, and the inventories are modelled using the OpenLCA 1.6.3 and ecoinvent 3.9 cut-off regionalized database. EI are evaluated in twelve categories, including climate change, fossil and nuclear energy use, freshwater (acidification, ecotoxicity and eutrophication), human toxicity (cancer and non-cancer), mineral resources use, ozone layer depletion, particulate matter formation, photochemical oxidant formation, and terrestrial acidification. Impact World+ method for Latin America version 1.251 is employed to calculate EI. Nine Eco-efficiency indicators and trade-off analyses are evaluated to gain insights into design decision outcomes. Among the various panels considered, FML12, manufactured with aluminium alloy 1200-H14 treated only with sanding, castor oil biopolymer and untreated coir fibres, present the most consistent eco-efficiency indicators. The reference scenario considers the average characteristics of FML (both environmental and mechanical) for trade-off analysis. Despite the fifty percent chance of better performance, FML12 is the only panel that shows higher mechanical performance and lower EI compared to the reference scenario. The importance of this article lies in the novel results obtained using the proposed eco-efficiency indicators, which can be expanded in further studies on the topic.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Composites Part C Open Access\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024000069/pdfft?md5=c116e0bbdb1f3bed69068da9edf9a407&pid=1-s2.0-S2666682024000069-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Composites Part C Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024000069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part C Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管对可再生资源(RR)及其在复合材料和夹层结构中的潜在应用进行了广泛的研究,但全面评估可再生资源在减轻环境影响(EI)方面的功效的生命周期评估(LCA)研究仍然非常缺乏。为了弥补这一不足,本研究旨在调查十二种不同设计的夹层板,具体称为纤维金属层压板(FML)。这些 FML 结合了铝皮(2024-T3 和 1200-H14)、聚合物基材(环氧树脂、聚酯和蓖麻油生物聚氨酯)、天然纤维(剑麻、椰子纤维和仙人掌纤维)、铝皮表面处理(打磨、NaOH 和 Washprimer)以及天然纤维处理(研磨、NaOH 处理和未处理)。使用 OpenLCA 1.6.3 和 ecoinvent 3.9 截断区域化数据库进行了从摇篮到终点的生命周期评估和库存建模。环境影响指数按十二个类别进行评估,包括气候变化、化石和核能使用、淡水(酸化、生态毒性和富营养化)、人类毒性(癌症和非癌症)、矿产资源使用、臭氧层破坏、颗粒物形成、光化学氧化剂形成和陆地酸化。采用拉丁美洲 Impact World+ 方法 1.251 版计算 EI。对九个生态效益指标和权衡分析进行了评估,以深入了解设计决策的结果。在所考虑的各种板材中,使用仅经砂磨处理的铝合金 1200-H14、蓖麻油生物聚合物和未经处理的棕纤维制造的 FML12 的生态效益指标最为一致。参考方案考虑了 FML 的平均特性(环境和机械特性),以进行权衡分析。尽管 FML12 有百分之五十的机会获得更好的性能,但与参考方案相比,FML12 是唯一显示出更高机械性能和更低 EI 的面板。这篇文章的重要性在于利用提出的生态效率指标得出了新的结果,这些结果可以在有关该主题的进一步研究中得到扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Life cycle assessment of fibre metal laminates: An ecodesign approach

Despite the extensive research on renewable resources (RR) and their potential applications in composite materials and sandwich structures, there remains a significant dearth of life cycle assessment (LCA) studies that comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of RR in mitigating environmental impacts (EI). To bridge this gap, the present study aims to investigate twelve different designs of sandwich panels, specifically referred to as Fibre Metal Laminates (FML). These FML combine aluminium skins (2024-T3 and 1200-H14), polymer matrices (Epoxy, Polyester, and Castor oil Bio-PU), natural fibres (Sisal, Coir, and Cynodon spp.), surface treatments for aluminium skins (sanding, NaOH, and Washprimer), and treatments for natural fibres (Ground, NaOH-treatment and untreated). A cradle-to-gate LCA is conducted, and the inventories are modelled using the OpenLCA 1.6.3 and ecoinvent 3.9 cut-off regionalized database. EI are evaluated in twelve categories, including climate change, fossil and nuclear energy use, freshwater (acidification, ecotoxicity and eutrophication), human toxicity (cancer and non-cancer), mineral resources use, ozone layer depletion, particulate matter formation, photochemical oxidant formation, and terrestrial acidification. Impact World+ method for Latin America version 1.251 is employed to calculate EI. Nine Eco-efficiency indicators and trade-off analyses are evaluated to gain insights into design decision outcomes. Among the various panels considered, FML12, manufactured with aluminium alloy 1200-H14 treated only with sanding, castor oil biopolymer and untreated coir fibres, present the most consistent eco-efficiency indicators. The reference scenario considers the average characteristics of FML (both environmental and mechanical) for trade-off analysis. Despite the fifty percent chance of better performance, FML12 is the only panel that shows higher mechanical performance and lower EI compared to the reference scenario. The importance of this article lies in the novel results obtained using the proposed eco-efficiency indicators, which can be expanded in further studies on the topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part C Open Access
Composites Part C Open Access Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
96
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信