{"title":"应用研究说明:家禽饮用水系统生物膜的微生物组成","authors":"Tolulope T. Ogundipe, Samantha Beitia, Tomi Obe","doi":"10.1016/j.japr.2024.100403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ensuring good water quality is one of the key management strategies to promote optimal broiler health and performance. A few studies have assessed the microbial status of drinking water for poultry, but there is insufficient information on biofilm in the drinking water lines within the poultry housing facilities. The buildup of microbes in the drinking water system could potentially result in biofilm formation which eventually deteriorates water quality. Hence, in this preliminary study, we sought to evaluate biofilm formation in the drinking water lines of selected broiler houses and characterize their microbial composition. Three random houses in each of 5 farms were visited representing 15 total houses used in this study. Using a borescope, we confirmed the presence of biofilm in 4 water lines per house on each farm, and a sterile gauze swab was used to collect the biofilm from these water lines. All biofilm samples were analyzed for the total aerobic plate count (<strong>APC</strong>), presence of yeasts and molds (<strong>YM</strong>), and <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> (<strong>EB</strong>). The data were analyzed with ANOVA, and means were separated with Tukey's HSD test at <em>P</em> ≤ 0.05 using JMP software. All 15 houses evaluated had aerobic bacteria population and YM, whereas 7 out of the 15 houses had EB counts. For APC, there were significant differences across the farms (<em>P</em> < 0.0001) with Farm 1 having the highest APC (3.65 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL) and Farm 5 having the lowest APC (2.05 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). For YM, significant differences existed across farms (<em>P</em> < 0.0001), Farm 2 had the highest counts (4.44 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL), whereas Farm 5 had the lowest count (1.19 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). EB was detected in 3 out of the 5 farms and the counts were not statistically different (<em>P</em> = 0.07). Based on a sample size of 15 commercial broiler houses, these results suggest the need to evaluate water lines for biofilm and develop effective mitigations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","volume":"33 2","pages":"Article 100403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000023/pdfft?md5=e4d56a25a915207a77299e67905c6d5d&pid=1-s2.0-S1056617124000023-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applied Research Note: Microbial composition of the biofilm of poultry drinking water system\",\"authors\":\"Tolulope T. Ogundipe, Samantha Beitia, Tomi Obe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japr.2024.100403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ensuring good water quality is one of the key management strategies to promote optimal broiler health and performance. A few studies have assessed the microbial status of drinking water for poultry, but there is insufficient information on biofilm in the drinking water lines within the poultry housing facilities. The buildup of microbes in the drinking water system could potentially result in biofilm formation which eventually deteriorates water quality. Hence, in this preliminary study, we sought to evaluate biofilm formation in the drinking water lines of selected broiler houses and characterize their microbial composition. Three random houses in each of 5 farms were visited representing 15 total houses used in this study. Using a borescope, we confirmed the presence of biofilm in 4 water lines per house on each farm, and a sterile gauze swab was used to collect the biofilm from these water lines. All biofilm samples were analyzed for the total aerobic plate count (<strong>APC</strong>), presence of yeasts and molds (<strong>YM</strong>), and <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> (<strong>EB</strong>). The data were analyzed with ANOVA, and means were separated with Tukey's HSD test at <em>P</em> ≤ 0.05 using JMP software. All 15 houses evaluated had aerobic bacteria population and YM, whereas 7 out of the 15 houses had EB counts. For APC, there were significant differences across the farms (<em>P</em> < 0.0001) with Farm 1 having the highest APC (3.65 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL) and Farm 5 having the lowest APC (2.05 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). For YM, significant differences existed across farms (<em>P</em> < 0.0001), Farm 2 had the highest counts (4.44 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL), whereas Farm 5 had the lowest count (1.19 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). EB was detected in 3 out of the 5 farms and the counts were not statistically different (<em>P</em> = 0.07). Based on a sample size of 15 commercial broiler houses, these results suggest the need to evaluate water lines for biofilm and develop effective mitigations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Poultry Research\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000023/pdfft?md5=e4d56a25a915207a77299e67905c6d5d&pid=1-s2.0-S1056617124000023-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Poultry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Applied Research Note: Microbial composition of the biofilm of poultry drinking water system
Ensuring good water quality is one of the key management strategies to promote optimal broiler health and performance. A few studies have assessed the microbial status of drinking water for poultry, but there is insufficient information on biofilm in the drinking water lines within the poultry housing facilities. The buildup of microbes in the drinking water system could potentially result in biofilm formation which eventually deteriorates water quality. Hence, in this preliminary study, we sought to evaluate biofilm formation in the drinking water lines of selected broiler houses and characterize their microbial composition. Three random houses in each of 5 farms were visited representing 15 total houses used in this study. Using a borescope, we confirmed the presence of biofilm in 4 water lines per house on each farm, and a sterile gauze swab was used to collect the biofilm from these water lines. All biofilm samples were analyzed for the total aerobic plate count (APC), presence of yeasts and molds (YM), and Enterobacteriaceae (EB). The data were analyzed with ANOVA, and means were separated with Tukey's HSD test at P ≤ 0.05 using JMP software. All 15 houses evaluated had aerobic bacteria population and YM, whereas 7 out of the 15 houses had EB counts. For APC, there were significant differences across the farms (P < 0.0001) with Farm 1 having the highest APC (3.65 Log10 CFU/mL) and Farm 5 having the lowest APC (2.05 Log10 CFU/mL). For YM, significant differences existed across farms (P < 0.0001), Farm 2 had the highest counts (4.44 Log10 CFU/mL), whereas Farm 5 had the lowest count (1.19 Log10 CFU/mL). EB was detected in 3 out of the 5 farms and the counts were not statistically different (P = 0.07). Based on a sample size of 15 commercial broiler houses, these results suggest the need to evaluate water lines for biofilm and develop effective mitigations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (JAPR) publishes original research reports, field reports, and reviews on breeding, hatching, health and disease, layer management, meat bird processing and products, meat bird management, microbiology, food safety, nutrition, environment, sanitation, welfare, and economics. As of January 2020, JAPR will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers.
The readers of JAPR are in education, extension, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, veterinary medicine, management, production, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Nutritionists, breeder flock supervisors, production managers, microbiologists, laboratory personnel, food safety and sanitation managers, poultry processing managers, feed manufacturers, and egg producers use JAPR to keep up with current applied poultry research.