应用研究说明:家禽饮用水系统生物膜的微生物组成

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Tolulope T. Ogundipe, Samantha Beitia, Tomi Obe
{"title":"应用研究说明:家禽饮用水系统生物膜的微生物组成","authors":"Tolulope T. Ogundipe,&nbsp;Samantha Beitia,&nbsp;Tomi Obe","doi":"10.1016/j.japr.2024.100403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ensuring good water quality is one of the key management strategies to promote optimal broiler health and performance. A few studies have assessed the microbial status of drinking water for poultry, but there is insufficient information on biofilm in the drinking water lines within the poultry housing facilities. The buildup of microbes in the drinking water system could potentially result in biofilm formation which eventually deteriorates water quality. Hence, in this preliminary study, we sought to evaluate biofilm formation in the drinking water lines of selected broiler houses and characterize their microbial composition. Three random houses in each of 5 farms were visited representing 15 total houses used in this study. Using a borescope, we confirmed the presence of biofilm in 4 water lines per house on each farm, and a sterile gauze swab was used to collect the biofilm from these water lines. All biofilm samples were analyzed for the total aerobic plate count (<strong>APC</strong>), presence of yeasts and molds (<strong>YM</strong>), and <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> (<strong>EB</strong>). The data were analyzed with ANOVA, and means were separated with Tukey's HSD test at <em>P</em> ≤ 0.05 using JMP software. All 15 houses evaluated had aerobic bacteria population and YM, whereas 7 out of the 15 houses had EB counts. For APC, there were significant differences across the farms (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) with Farm 1 having the highest APC (3.65 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL) and Farm 5 having the lowest APC (2.05 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). For YM, significant differences existed across farms (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), Farm 2 had the highest counts (4.44 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL), whereas Farm 5 had the lowest count (1.19 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). EB was detected in 3 out of the 5 farms and the counts were not statistically different (<em>P</em> = 0.07). Based on a sample size of 15 commercial broiler houses, these results suggest the need to evaluate water lines for biofilm and develop effective mitigations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","volume":"33 2","pages":"Article 100403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000023/pdfft?md5=e4d56a25a915207a77299e67905c6d5d&pid=1-s2.0-S1056617124000023-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applied Research Note: Microbial composition of the biofilm of poultry drinking water system\",\"authors\":\"Tolulope T. Ogundipe,&nbsp;Samantha Beitia,&nbsp;Tomi Obe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japr.2024.100403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ensuring good water quality is one of the key management strategies to promote optimal broiler health and performance. A few studies have assessed the microbial status of drinking water for poultry, but there is insufficient information on biofilm in the drinking water lines within the poultry housing facilities. The buildup of microbes in the drinking water system could potentially result in biofilm formation which eventually deteriorates water quality. Hence, in this preliminary study, we sought to evaluate biofilm formation in the drinking water lines of selected broiler houses and characterize their microbial composition. Three random houses in each of 5 farms were visited representing 15 total houses used in this study. Using a borescope, we confirmed the presence of biofilm in 4 water lines per house on each farm, and a sterile gauze swab was used to collect the biofilm from these water lines. All biofilm samples were analyzed for the total aerobic plate count (<strong>APC</strong>), presence of yeasts and molds (<strong>YM</strong>), and <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> (<strong>EB</strong>). The data were analyzed with ANOVA, and means were separated with Tukey's HSD test at <em>P</em> ≤ 0.05 using JMP software. All 15 houses evaluated had aerobic bacteria population and YM, whereas 7 out of the 15 houses had EB counts. For APC, there were significant differences across the farms (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) with Farm 1 having the highest APC (3.65 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL) and Farm 5 having the lowest APC (2.05 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). For YM, significant differences existed across farms (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), Farm 2 had the highest counts (4.44 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL), whereas Farm 5 had the lowest count (1.19 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). EB was detected in 3 out of the 5 farms and the counts were not statistically different (<em>P</em> = 0.07). Based on a sample size of 15 commercial broiler houses, these results suggest the need to evaluate water lines for biofilm and develop effective mitigations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Poultry Research\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000023/pdfft?md5=e4d56a25a915207a77299e67905c6d5d&pid=1-s2.0-S1056617124000023-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Poultry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确保良好的水质是促进肉鸡最佳健康和生产性能的关键管理策略之一。有几项研究对家禽饮用水的微生物状况进行了评估,但有关家禽饲养设施内饮用水管中生物膜的信息不足。饮用水系统中微生物的积累有可能导致生物膜的形成,最终使水质恶化。因此,在这项初步研究中,我们试图评估所选肉鸡舍饮用水管中生物膜的形成情况,并确定其微生物组成的特征。我们随机走访了五个农场中的三个鸡舍,共 15 个鸡舍。我们使用内窥镜确认每个鸡场每栋鸡舍的四条水管中存在生物膜,并使用无菌纱布拭子从这些水管中收集生物膜。对所有生物膜样本进行需氧平板计数(APC)、酵母菌和霉菌(YM)以及肠杆菌科(EB)分析。使用 JMP® 软件对数据进行方差分析,并通过 Tukey's HSD 检验(p ≤ 0.05)来区分均值。所评估的 15 栋房屋都有好氧菌群和 YM,而 15 栋房屋中有 7 栋有 EB 计数。各养殖场的 APC 存在显著差异(p < 0.0001),其中 1 号养殖场的 APC 最高(3.65 Log10 CFU/mL),5 号养殖场的 APC 最低(2.05 Log10 CFU/mL)。对于 YM,各农场之间存在显著差异(p < 0.0001),2 号农场的计数最高(4.44 Log10 CFU/mL),而 5 号农场的计数最低(1.19 Log10 CFU/mL)。5 个农场中有 3 个检测到 EB,其计数无统计学差异(p = 0.07)。根据 15 个商业肉鸡舍的样本量,这些结果表明有必要对水管进行生物膜评估,并制定有效的缓解措施:兽医、家禽生产商和家禽饲养者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applied Research Note: Microbial composition of the biofilm of poultry drinking water system

Ensuring good water quality is one of the key management strategies to promote optimal broiler health and performance. A few studies have assessed the microbial status of drinking water for poultry, but there is insufficient information on biofilm in the drinking water lines within the poultry housing facilities. The buildup of microbes in the drinking water system could potentially result in biofilm formation which eventually deteriorates water quality. Hence, in this preliminary study, we sought to evaluate biofilm formation in the drinking water lines of selected broiler houses and characterize their microbial composition. Three random houses in each of 5 farms were visited representing 15 total houses used in this study. Using a borescope, we confirmed the presence of biofilm in 4 water lines per house on each farm, and a sterile gauze swab was used to collect the biofilm from these water lines. All biofilm samples were analyzed for the total aerobic plate count (APC), presence of yeasts and molds (YM), and Enterobacteriaceae (EB). The data were analyzed with ANOVA, and means were separated with Tukey's HSD test at P ≤ 0.05 using JMP software. All 15 houses evaluated had aerobic bacteria population and YM, whereas 7 out of the 15 houses had EB counts. For APC, there were significant differences across the farms (P < 0.0001) with Farm 1 having the highest APC (3.65 Log10 CFU/mL) and Farm 5 having the lowest APC (2.05 Log10 CFU/mL). For YM, significant differences existed across farms (P < 0.0001), Farm 2 had the highest counts (4.44 Log10 CFU/mL), whereas Farm 5 had the lowest count (1.19 Log10 CFU/mL). EB was detected in 3 out of the 5 farms and the counts were not statistically different (P = 0.07). Based on a sample size of 15 commercial broiler houses, these results suggest the need to evaluate water lines for biofilm and develop effective mitigations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Poultry Research
Journal of Applied Poultry Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
80
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (JAPR) publishes original research reports, field reports, and reviews on breeding, hatching, health and disease, layer management, meat bird processing and products, meat bird management, microbiology, food safety, nutrition, environment, sanitation, welfare, and economics. As of January 2020, JAPR will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers. The readers of JAPR are in education, extension, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, veterinary medicine, management, production, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Nutritionists, breeder flock supervisors, production managers, microbiologists, laboratory personnel, food safety and sanitation managers, poultry processing managers, feed manufacturers, and egg producers use JAPR to keep up with current applied poultry research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信