评估学生的可持续发展意识与他们认为的教学风格之间的关系:巴基斯坦背景下的探索性研究

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ayesha Nousheen, Farkhanda Tabassum
{"title":"评估学生的可持续发展意识与他们认为的教学风格之间的关系:巴基斯坦背景下的探索性研究","authors":"Ayesha Nousheen, Farkhanda Tabassum","doi":"10.1108/ijshe-12-2022-0406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to asses students’ sustainability consciousness (SC) in relation to their perceived teaching styles in seven public sector institutions in Pakistan.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A survey technique was used to collect data from respondents. Grasha’s (1996) Teaching Styles Inventory and Gericke <em>et al.</em>’s (2019) Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire were used to collect data pertinent to teachers’ teaching styles and students’ SC, respectively. This study’s population was 1,986 students studying in seven educational institutions. A sample of 993 students was selected for the study. Out of the 993 questionnaires distributed, only 753 respondents returned the questionnaire completely filled, resulting in a response rate of 75.83%. Descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to analyze the data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that students’ mean scores on environmental and social dimensions were higher compared with the economic dimension. Similarly, students’ scores were relatively higher on the knowledge and attitude dimension while lower on the behavior dimension. Moreover, the expert and formal authority teaching styles were the most prevalent teaching styles. Furthermore, SEM results show that various teaching styles affected students’ knowledge and attitude; however, only the delegator teaching style affects all three dimensions of SC.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This research has implications for educational institutions and policymakers to ensure dedicated efforts to promote and integrate education for sustainable development into the educational system and achieve sustainability goals by 2030.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The study findings will help future teachers to effectively integrate sustainability education into their classrooms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research expands the discussion on the effectiveness of various teaching styles on SC in teacher education programs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing students’ sustainability consciousness in relation to their perceived teaching styles: an exploratory study in Pakistani context\",\"authors\":\"Ayesha Nousheen, Farkhanda Tabassum\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijshe-12-2022-0406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to asses students’ sustainability consciousness (SC) in relation to their perceived teaching styles in seven public sector institutions in Pakistan.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>A survey technique was used to collect data from respondents. Grasha’s (1996) Teaching Styles Inventory and Gericke <em>et al.</em>’s (2019) Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire were used to collect data pertinent to teachers’ teaching styles and students’ SC, respectively. This study’s population was 1,986 students studying in seven educational institutions. A sample of 993 students was selected for the study. Out of the 993 questionnaires distributed, only 753 respondents returned the questionnaire completely filled, resulting in a response rate of 75.83%. Descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to analyze the data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The results show that students’ mean scores on environmental and social dimensions were higher compared with the economic dimension. Similarly, students’ scores were relatively higher on the knowledge and attitude dimension while lower on the behavior dimension. Moreover, the expert and formal authority teaching styles were the most prevalent teaching styles. Furthermore, SEM results show that various teaching styles affected students’ knowledge and attitude; however, only the delegator teaching style affects all three dimensions of SC.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>This research has implications for educational institutions and policymakers to ensure dedicated efforts to promote and integrate education for sustainable development into the educational system and achieve sustainability goals by 2030.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The study findings will help future teachers to effectively integrate sustainability education into their classrooms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This research expands the discussion on the effectiveness of various teaching styles on SC in teacher education programs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-12-2022-0406\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-12-2022-0406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估巴基斯坦七所公立院校学生的可持续发展意识(SC)与他们认为的教学风格之间的关系。格拉沙(1996 年)的教学风格量表和格里克等人(2019 年)的可持续发展意识问卷分别用于收集与教师教学风格和学生可持续发展意识相关的数据。本研究的研究对象是在七所教育机构就读的 1 986 名学生。研究选取了 993 名学生作为样本。在发放的 993 份问卷中,只有 753 名受访者完整填写了问卷,问卷回收率为 75.83%。研究结果表明,与经济维度相比,学生在环境和社会维度上的平均得分更高。同样,学生在知识和态度维度上的得分相对较高,而在行为维度上的得分较低。此外,专家和正式权威教学风格是最普遍的教学风格。此外,SEM 结果表明,各种教学风格都会影响学生的知识和态度;但是,只有授权者教学风格会影响可持续发展教育的所有三个维度。研究局限/意义本研究对教育机构和政策制定者具有启示意义,可确保致力于促进可持续发展教育并将其纳入教育体系,到 2030 年实现可持续发展目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing students’ sustainability consciousness in relation to their perceived teaching styles: an exploratory study in Pakistani context

Purpose

This study aims to asses students’ sustainability consciousness (SC) in relation to their perceived teaching styles in seven public sector institutions in Pakistan.

Design/methodology/approach

A survey technique was used to collect data from respondents. Grasha’s (1996) Teaching Styles Inventory and Gericke et al.’s (2019) Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire were used to collect data pertinent to teachers’ teaching styles and students’ SC, respectively. This study’s population was 1,986 students studying in seven educational institutions. A sample of 993 students was selected for the study. Out of the 993 questionnaires distributed, only 753 respondents returned the questionnaire completely filled, resulting in a response rate of 75.83%. Descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to analyze the data.

Findings

The results show that students’ mean scores on environmental and social dimensions were higher compared with the economic dimension. Similarly, students’ scores were relatively higher on the knowledge and attitude dimension while lower on the behavior dimension. Moreover, the expert and formal authority teaching styles were the most prevalent teaching styles. Furthermore, SEM results show that various teaching styles affected students’ knowledge and attitude; however, only the delegator teaching style affects all three dimensions of SC.

Research limitations/implications

This research has implications for educational institutions and policymakers to ensure dedicated efforts to promote and integrate education for sustainable development into the educational system and achieve sustainability goals by 2030.

Practical implications

The study findings will help future teachers to effectively integrate sustainability education into their classrooms.

Originality/value

This research expands the discussion on the effectiveness of various teaching styles on SC in teacher education programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The aim of International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education is to provide up-to-date information on new developments and trends on sustainability in a higher education context, and to catalyse networking and information exchange on sustainable development as a whole, and on the SDGs in particular, on a global basis. Authors are invited to submit papers from the following areas: Environmental management systems, Sustainable development, Sustainable Development Goals, Curricular innovation, Campus greening, Operational aspects of universities, Energy, water, recycling, waste management, Planning and design of campuses, Environmental reports, Environmental policies and action plans, Staff and student initiatives. Other themes associated to the above or emerging topics will also be considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信