{"title":"新兴工业化国家的金融发展与收入不平等:金融库兹涅茨曲线存在吗?","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s13132-023-01705-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>The aim of this study is to test the validity of the classical Kuznets curve and financial Kuznets curve (FKC) hypotheses. In addition, in this study, the relationship between financial development and income inequality is discussed, the effect of financial development on income inequality is empirically explored, and policy recommendations are made within the framework of the analysis in 10 newly ındustrialized countries. The annual data spanning 1985–2019 were collected to examine the nexus among financial development, per capita GDP, and income inequality. Moreover, control variables of government expenditures, urban population, foreign direct investment, and economic globalization index were added to the empirical model as explanatory variables. Income inequality is measured by Gini coefficient. Panel autoregressive distributed lag model (Panel ARDL) and panel generalized moment method-system (Panel GMM) were used in the analyses. According to the results obtained in the study, while economic globalization increases income inequality, government expenditures, and urban population and foreign direct investments reduce income inequality. However, while GDP and financial development itself increased the Gini coefficient, it decreased the squares. Therefore, it is concluded that both classical Kuznets curve and financial Kuznets curve hypotheses are valid for newly ındustrialized countries. It is possible that the findings obtained in the analysis will be used by the policy makers of these countries for the development of financial systems in order to reduce inequality. Increasing the efficiency of the financial sector with structural regulations and various incentive policies is important for countries with financially underdeveloped.</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Development and Income Inequality in Newly Industrialized Countries: Does Financial Kuznets Curve Exists?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13132-023-01705-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>The aim of this study is to test the validity of the classical Kuznets curve and financial Kuznets curve (FKC) hypotheses. In addition, in this study, the relationship between financial development and income inequality is discussed, the effect of financial development on income inequality is empirically explored, and policy recommendations are made within the framework of the analysis in 10 newly ındustrialized countries. The annual data spanning 1985–2019 were collected to examine the nexus among financial development, per capita GDP, and income inequality. Moreover, control variables of government expenditures, urban population, foreign direct investment, and economic globalization index were added to the empirical model as explanatory variables. Income inequality is measured by Gini coefficient. Panel autoregressive distributed lag model (Panel ARDL) and panel generalized moment method-system (Panel GMM) were used in the analyses. According to the results obtained in the study, while economic globalization increases income inequality, government expenditures, and urban population and foreign direct investments reduce income inequality. However, while GDP and financial development itself increased the Gini coefficient, it decreased the squares. Therefore, it is concluded that both classical Kuznets curve and financial Kuznets curve hypotheses are valid for newly ındustrialized countries. It is possible that the findings obtained in the analysis will be used by the policy makers of these countries for the development of financial systems in order to reduce inequality. Increasing the efficiency of the financial sector with structural regulations and various incentive policies is important for countries with financially underdeveloped.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Knowledge Economy\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Knowledge Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01705-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01705-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 本研究旨在检验经典库兹涅茨曲线和金融库兹涅茨曲线(FKC)假设的有效性。此外,本研究还讨论了金融发展与收入不平等之间的关系,实证探讨了金融发展对收入不平等的影响,并在分析框架内对 10 个新兴工业化国家提出了政策建议。本文收集了 1985-2019 年的年度数据,以研究金融发展、人均 GDP 和收入不平等之间的关系。此外,实证模型还加入了政府支出、城市人口、外国直接投资和经济全球化指数等控制变量作为解释变量。收入不平等用基尼系数衡量。分析中使用了面板自回归分布滞后模型(Panel ARDL)和面板广义矩法系统(Panel GMM)。研究结果表明,虽然经济全球化加剧了收入不平等,但政府支出、城市人口和外国直接投资却减少了收入不平等。然而,虽然 GDP 和金融发展本身增加了基尼系数,但却降低了平方系数。因此,可以得出结论,经典库兹涅茨曲线和金融库兹涅茨曲线假说对于新兴工业化国家都是有效的。这些国家的决策者有可能利用分析得出的结论来发展金融体系,以减少不平等现象。通过结构性监管和各种激励政策来提高金融部门的效率,对于金融不发达的国家来说非常重要。
Financial Development and Income Inequality in Newly Industrialized Countries: Does Financial Kuznets Curve Exists?
Abstract
The aim of this study is to test the validity of the classical Kuznets curve and financial Kuznets curve (FKC) hypotheses. In addition, in this study, the relationship between financial development and income inequality is discussed, the effect of financial development on income inequality is empirically explored, and policy recommendations are made within the framework of the analysis in 10 newly ındustrialized countries. The annual data spanning 1985–2019 were collected to examine the nexus among financial development, per capita GDP, and income inequality. Moreover, control variables of government expenditures, urban population, foreign direct investment, and economic globalization index were added to the empirical model as explanatory variables. Income inequality is measured by Gini coefficient. Panel autoregressive distributed lag model (Panel ARDL) and panel generalized moment method-system (Panel GMM) were used in the analyses. According to the results obtained in the study, while economic globalization increases income inequality, government expenditures, and urban population and foreign direct investments reduce income inequality. However, while GDP and financial development itself increased the Gini coefficient, it decreased the squares. Therefore, it is concluded that both classical Kuznets curve and financial Kuznets curve hypotheses are valid for newly ındustrialized countries. It is possible that the findings obtained in the analysis will be used by the policy makers of these countries for the development of financial systems in order to reduce inequality. Increasing the efficiency of the financial sector with structural regulations and various incentive policies is important for countries with financially underdeveloped.
期刊介绍:
In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.