韩国病态肥胖患者减肥代谢手术后各种减肥成功标准模型的比较分析。

Sangjun Lee, Won Jun Seo, Sungsoo Park, Chang Min Lee, Yeongkeun Kwon, Sung Il Choi, Jong-Han Kim
{"title":"韩国病态肥胖患者减肥代谢手术后各种减肥成功标准模型的比较分析。","authors":"Sangjun Lee, Won Jun Seo, Sungsoo Park, Chang Min Lee, Yeongkeun Kwon, Sung Il Choi, Jong-Han Kim","doi":"10.17476/jmbs.2023.12.2.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify weight loss prediction models by validating previous models using weight loss success criteria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with morbid obesity from 4 hospitals were retrospectively analyzed between Jan 2019 and 2022. Preoperative demographics, postoperative data, and 1-year follow-up weight loss outcomes were compared between 2 groups who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Additionally, the predictive factors for the success of excess weight loss (EWL) (>50%) and total weight loss (TWL) (>25%) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 162 patients, 137 were enrolled during the study period, 75 underwent LSG, and 62 underwent LRYGB. The >50% EWL and >25% TWL 1 year after surgery were 61.3% and 43.1%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus medication use was reduced in 94.8% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Male sex and body mass index (BMI) were independent risk factors for successful weight loss (SWL) or >50% EWL (odds ratio [OR] for BMI 0.830, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.764-0.902), whereas achieving >25% TWL was not affected by sex or BMI (OR for BMI 1.010, 95% CI 0.957-1.065). External validation of the prediction models showed an acceptable range of accuracy (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> 66.5-71.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LSG and LRYGB are feasible and effective bariatric procedures for SWL in Korean patients with morbid obesity. The TWL model was a more appropriate criterion than EWL, and weight loss prediction models may help assess the 1-year outcomes of bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10771973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Various Weight Loss Success Criteria Models After Bariatric Metabolic Surgery in Korean Morbid Obese Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sangjun Lee, Won Jun Seo, Sungsoo Park, Chang Min Lee, Yeongkeun Kwon, Sung Il Choi, Jong-Han Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17476/jmbs.2023.12.2.67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify weight loss prediction models by validating previous models using weight loss success criteria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with morbid obesity from 4 hospitals were retrospectively analyzed between Jan 2019 and 2022. Preoperative demographics, postoperative data, and 1-year follow-up weight loss outcomes were compared between 2 groups who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Additionally, the predictive factors for the success of excess weight loss (EWL) (>50%) and total weight loss (TWL) (>25%) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 162 patients, 137 were enrolled during the study period, 75 underwent LSG, and 62 underwent LRYGB. The >50% EWL and >25% TWL 1 year after surgery were 61.3% and 43.1%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus medication use was reduced in 94.8% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Male sex and body mass index (BMI) were independent risk factors for successful weight loss (SWL) or >50% EWL (odds ratio [OR] for BMI 0.830, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.764-0.902), whereas achieving >25% TWL was not affected by sex or BMI (OR for BMI 1.010, 95% CI 0.957-1.065). External validation of the prediction models showed an acceptable range of accuracy (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> 66.5-71.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LSG and LRYGB are feasible and effective bariatric procedures for SWL in Korean patients with morbid obesity. The TWL model was a more appropriate criterion than EWL, and weight loss prediction models may help assess the 1-year outcomes of bariatric surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10771973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2023.12.2.67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2023.12.2.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过验证以往使用减肥成功标准的模型,确定减肥预测模型:回顾性分析了 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年期间 4 家医院的病态肥胖患者。比较了接受腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)的两组患者的术前人口统计学、术后数据和1年随访减重结果。此外,还分析了超重(EWL)(>50%)和总重量(TWL)(>25%)成功的预测因素:162名患者中有137人在研究期间入组,75人接受了LSG,62人接受了LRYGB。术后 1 年 EWL >50% 和 TWL >25% 的比例分别为 61.3% 和 43.1%。94.8%的2型糖尿病患者减少了糖尿病药物的使用。男性性别和体重指数(BMI)是成功减重(SWL)或EWL>50%的独立风险因素(BMI的几率比[OR]为0.830,95%置信区间[CI]为0.764-0.902),而实现TWL>25%不受性别或BMI的影响(BMI的几率比为1.010,95%置信区间[CI]为0.957-1.065)。预测模型的外部验证显示其准确性在可接受的范围内(调整后 R2 为 66.5%-71.3%):结论:LSG 和 LRYGB 是韩国病态肥胖患者进行 SWL 的可行且有效的减肥手术。TWL模型是比EWL更合适的标准,减重预测模型有助于评估减肥手术的1年效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Various Weight Loss Success Criteria Models After Bariatric Metabolic Surgery in Korean Morbid Obese Patients.

Purpose: To identify weight loss prediction models by validating previous models using weight loss success criteria.

Materials and methods: Patients with morbid obesity from 4 hospitals were retrospectively analyzed between Jan 2019 and 2022. Preoperative demographics, postoperative data, and 1-year follow-up weight loss outcomes were compared between 2 groups who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Additionally, the predictive factors for the success of excess weight loss (EWL) (>50%) and total weight loss (TWL) (>25%) were analyzed.

Results: Of the 162 patients, 137 were enrolled during the study period, 75 underwent LSG, and 62 underwent LRYGB. The >50% EWL and >25% TWL 1 year after surgery were 61.3% and 43.1%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus medication use was reduced in 94.8% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Male sex and body mass index (BMI) were independent risk factors for successful weight loss (SWL) or >50% EWL (odds ratio [OR] for BMI 0.830, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.764-0.902), whereas achieving >25% TWL was not affected by sex or BMI (OR for BMI 1.010, 95% CI 0.957-1.065). External validation of the prediction models showed an acceptable range of accuracy (adjusted R2 66.5-71.3%).

Conclusion: LSG and LRYGB are feasible and effective bariatric procedures for SWL in Korean patients with morbid obesity. The TWL model was a more appropriate criterion than EWL, and weight loss prediction models may help assess the 1-year outcomes of bariatric surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信