抑郁症患者不遵医嘱用药的情况:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Roseane Halkjaer Lassen, Walter Gonçalves, Bruno Gherman, Evandro Coutinho, Antonio E Nardi, Maria Angélica Peres, José Carlos Appolinario
{"title":"抑郁症患者不遵医嘱用药的情况:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Roseane Halkjaer Lassen, Walter Gonçalves, Bruno Gherman, Evandro Coutinho, Antonio E Nardi, Maria Angélica Peres, José Carlos Appolinario","doi":"10.47626/2237-6089-2023-0680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medication non-adherence is frequently reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of this review is to consolidate data on the prevalence of non-adherence to antidepressant in MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42021199987. Studies assessing medication adherence in MDD were searched in PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL (The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and PsycINFO. The data extraction was performed by two independents authors. Meta-analysis used random effects model and performed a subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the articles retrieved, eleven studies were considered eligible for the final analysis. Most of them assessed non-adherence by self-report scales, followed by Pharmacy Dispensation Records, Monitoring Events Medication System (MEMS) and blood tests. The pooled proportion of non-adherence was 42% (95% IC 30%-54%), but heterogeneity was very large (I2=99%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data from the selected studies suggests that a high number of individuals with MDD do not adequately take their medication as prescribed. The high heterogenicity of measures used for the assessment of adherence may have impacted the great variability of the results. The results suggest it is necessary that health care professionals should address this issue in order to achieve a better treatment outcome in major depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":46305,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication Non-adherence in Depression: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis.\",\"authors\":\"Roseane Halkjaer Lassen, Walter Gonçalves, Bruno Gherman, Evandro Coutinho, Antonio E Nardi, Maria Angélica Peres, José Carlos Appolinario\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/2237-6089-2023-0680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medication non-adherence is frequently reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of this review is to consolidate data on the prevalence of non-adherence to antidepressant in MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42021199987. Studies assessing medication adherence in MDD were searched in PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL (The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and PsycINFO. The data extraction was performed by two independents authors. Meta-analysis used random effects model and performed a subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the articles retrieved, eleven studies were considered eligible for the final analysis. Most of them assessed non-adherence by self-report scales, followed by Pharmacy Dispensation Records, Monitoring Events Medication System (MEMS) and blood tests. The pooled proportion of non-adherence was 42% (95% IC 30%-54%), but heterogeneity was very large (I2=99%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data from the selected studies suggests that a high number of individuals with MDD do not adequately take their medication as prescribed. The high heterogenicity of measures used for the assessment of adherence may have impacted the great variability of the results. The results suggest it is necessary that health care professionals should address this issue in order to achieve a better treatment outcome in major depression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2023-0680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2023-0680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者不坚持用药的报道屡见不鲜。本综述旨在整合有关重度抑郁症患者不遵从抗抑郁药物治疗的数据:方法:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,并在 PROSPERO 中注册了该方案,注册号为 CRD42021199987。评估 MDD 服药依从性的研究在 PubMed/Medline、Embase、CINAHL(护理与联合健康文献累积索引)和 PsycINFO 中进行了检索。数据提取由两位独立作者完成。元分析采用随机效应模型,并进行了亚组分析:在检索到的文章中,有 11 项研究被认为符合最终分析的条件。其中大部分研究通过自我报告量表评估不依从性,其次是药房配药记录、用药事件监测系统(MEMS)和血液检测。汇总的不依从比例为 42%(95% IC 30%-54%),但异质性非常大(I2=99%):结论:所选研究的数据表明,很多 MDD 患者没有按照处方充分服药。用于评估服药依从性的测量方法的高度异质性可能会影响结果的巨大差异。研究结果表明,医护人员有必要解决这一问题,以取得更好的重度抑郁症治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medication Non-adherence in Depression: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis.

Objective: Medication non-adherence is frequently reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of this review is to consolidate data on the prevalence of non-adherence to antidepressant in MDD.

Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42021199987. Studies assessing medication adherence in MDD were searched in PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL (The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and PsycINFO. The data extraction was performed by two independents authors. Meta-analysis used random effects model and performed a subgroup analysis.

Results: From the articles retrieved, eleven studies were considered eligible for the final analysis. Most of them assessed non-adherence by self-report scales, followed by Pharmacy Dispensation Records, Monitoring Events Medication System (MEMS) and blood tests. The pooled proportion of non-adherence was 42% (95% IC 30%-54%), but heterogeneity was very large (I2=99%).

Conclusion: Data from the selected studies suggests that a high number of individuals with MDD do not adequately take their medication as prescribed. The high heterogenicity of measures used for the assessment of adherence may have impacted the great variability of the results. The results suggest it is necessary that health care professionals should address this issue in order to achieve a better treatment outcome in major depression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信