P Saitamon, S Pravalpruekskul, N Vongphan, C Harnirattisai, V Sattabanasuk
{"title":"通用粘合剂应用模式对树脂复合修复牙齿抗折性的不同影响","authors":"P Saitamon, S Pravalpruekskul, N Vongphan, C Harnirattisai, V Sattabanasuk","doi":"10.2341/23-092-L","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the fracture resistance of teeth with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) resin composite restorations using universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal; SBU) in three different manipulation modes compared with those using two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE bond; CSE) and 3-step etch-and-rinse (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; SBMP) adhesives at 24 hours and after thermocycling. One hundred and sixty maxillary premolars were assigned into eight groups of 20 each. Intact teeth and nonrestored cavity-prepared teeth served as controls. For the remaining specimens, cavities were restored with resin composite using different adhesives-SBU in self-etch, etch-and-rinse, or selective enamel etching modes; CSE in self-etch or selective enamel etching; and SBMP. Specimens from each group were either stored in 37°C water for 24 hours or further submitted to thermocycling for 30,000 cycles (n=10), then subjected to axial compression stress until fracture. Fracture patterns were observed microscopically. Data were statistically analyzed at a 95% confidence level. Among the restored teeth, mean failure load of the group using SBMP was the highest at both short-term and long-term evaluation periods (p<0.05). Fracture strengths of the SBU groups where enamel was etched with phosphoric acid prior to the adhesive application were similar and were greater than in those specimens without pre-etching (p<0.05). After thermal aging, a significant decrease in fracture resistance value was detected only for the group using SBU in etch-and-rinse application mode (p<0.05). For the self-etch strategy, SBU demonstrated lower load to fracture than CSE following thermocycling; all specimens failed at and beneath the crestal level (p<0.05). Application of SBU universal adhesive in selective enamel etching mode provided higher and more stable fracture resistance of teeth with MOD resin composite restorations than in self-etch mode.</p>","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"200-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universal Adhesive Application Modes Differentially Affect the Fracture Resistance of Resin Composite Restored Teeth.\",\"authors\":\"P Saitamon, S Pravalpruekskul, N Vongphan, C Harnirattisai, V Sattabanasuk\",\"doi\":\"10.2341/23-092-L\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the fracture resistance of teeth with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) resin composite restorations using universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal; SBU) in three different manipulation modes compared with those using two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE bond; CSE) and 3-step etch-and-rinse (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; SBMP) adhesives at 24 hours and after thermocycling. One hundred and sixty maxillary premolars were assigned into eight groups of 20 each. Intact teeth and nonrestored cavity-prepared teeth served as controls. For the remaining specimens, cavities were restored with resin composite using different adhesives-SBU in self-etch, etch-and-rinse, or selective enamel etching modes; CSE in self-etch or selective enamel etching; and SBMP. Specimens from each group were either stored in 37°C water for 24 hours or further submitted to thermocycling for 30,000 cycles (n=10), then subjected to axial compression stress until fracture. Fracture patterns were observed microscopically. Data were statistically analyzed at a 95% confidence level. Among the restored teeth, mean failure load of the group using SBMP was the highest at both short-term and long-term evaluation periods (p<0.05). Fracture strengths of the SBU groups where enamel was etched with phosphoric acid prior to the adhesive application were similar and were greater than in those specimens without pre-etching (p<0.05). After thermal aging, a significant decrease in fracture resistance value was detected only for the group using SBU in etch-and-rinse application mode (p<0.05). For the self-etch strategy, SBU demonstrated lower load to fracture than CSE following thermocycling; all specimens failed at and beneath the crestal level (p<0.05). Application of SBU universal adhesive in selective enamel etching mode provided higher and more stable fracture resistance of teeth with MOD resin composite restorations than in self-etch mode.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"200-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2341/23-092-L\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/23-092-L","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Universal Adhesive Application Modes Differentially Affect the Fracture Resistance of Resin Composite Restored Teeth.
This study evaluated the fracture resistance of teeth with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) resin composite restorations using universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal; SBU) in three different manipulation modes compared with those using two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE bond; CSE) and 3-step etch-and-rinse (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; SBMP) adhesives at 24 hours and after thermocycling. One hundred and sixty maxillary premolars were assigned into eight groups of 20 each. Intact teeth and nonrestored cavity-prepared teeth served as controls. For the remaining specimens, cavities were restored with resin composite using different adhesives-SBU in self-etch, etch-and-rinse, or selective enamel etching modes; CSE in self-etch or selective enamel etching; and SBMP. Specimens from each group were either stored in 37°C water for 24 hours or further submitted to thermocycling for 30,000 cycles (n=10), then subjected to axial compression stress until fracture. Fracture patterns were observed microscopically. Data were statistically analyzed at a 95% confidence level. Among the restored teeth, mean failure load of the group using SBMP was the highest at both short-term and long-term evaluation periods (p<0.05). Fracture strengths of the SBU groups where enamel was etched with phosphoric acid prior to the adhesive application were similar and were greater than in those specimens without pre-etching (p<0.05). After thermal aging, a significant decrease in fracture resistance value was detected only for the group using SBU in etch-and-rinse application mode (p<0.05). For the self-etch strategy, SBU demonstrated lower load to fracture than CSE following thermocycling; all specimens failed at and beneath the crestal level (p<0.05). Application of SBU universal adhesive in selective enamel etching mode provided higher and more stable fracture resistance of teeth with MOD resin composite restorations than in self-etch mode.
期刊介绍:
Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts.
One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use.
The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity