皮质对丘脑反应性神经刺激治疗局灶性癫痫:单中心经验

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000001060
David Burdette, Sanjay Patra, Lise Johnson
{"title":"皮质对丘脑反应性神经刺激治疗局灶性癫痫:单中心经验","authors":"David Burdette, Sanjay Patra, Lise Johnson","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Owing to its extensive, reciprocal connectivity with the cortex and other subcortical structures, the thalamus is considered an important target for neuromodulation in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Using corticothalamic stimulation, it is possible to modulate both the thalamus and the cortical seizure onset zone. Limited published clinical experience describes corticothalamic stimulation with depth leads targeting one of the anterior (ANT), centromedian (centromedian nucleus), or pulvinar (PUL) thalamic nuclei. However, it is not clear which of these nuclei is the \"best\" therapeutic target.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study comprised a single-center experience with corticothalamic responsive neurostimulation using the RNS System to target these three thalamic nuclei. Presented here are the methods for target selection and device programming as well as clinical outcomes and a comparison of ictal and nonictal electrophysiological features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this small retrospective study ( N = 19), responsive corticothalamic neurostimulation was an effective therapy for 79% of patients (≥50% reduction in disabling seizure frequency), regardless of whether the thalamic lead was implanted in the ANT ( N = 2), PUL ( N = 6), or centromedian nucleus ( N = 11). Twenty-six percent of patients reported a reduction in disabling seizure frequency ≥90%. Both high frequency (≥100 Hz) and low (≤20 Hz) frequency were used to stimulate the thalamus depending on the patient's response and ability to tolerate higher charge densities. In all patients, a longer burst duration (2000-5000 ms) was ultimately implemented on the thalamic leads. Across patients, peaks in the intracranial EEG were observed at theta, beta, gamma, and sleep spindle frequencies. Changes in frequency content and distribution were observed over time in all three nuclei.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that both high frequency and low frequency corticothalamic responsive neurostimulation can potentially be an effective adjunctive therapy in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. These data can also contribute to a broader understanding of thalamic electrophysiology in the context of focal epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"630-639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corticothalamic Responsive Neurostimulation for Focal Epilepsy: A Single-Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"David Burdette, Sanjay Patra, Lise Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Owing to its extensive, reciprocal connectivity with the cortex and other subcortical structures, the thalamus is considered an important target for neuromodulation in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Using corticothalamic stimulation, it is possible to modulate both the thalamus and the cortical seizure onset zone. Limited published clinical experience describes corticothalamic stimulation with depth leads targeting one of the anterior (ANT), centromedian (centromedian nucleus), or pulvinar (PUL) thalamic nuclei. However, it is not clear which of these nuclei is the \\\"best\\\" therapeutic target.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study comprised a single-center experience with corticothalamic responsive neurostimulation using the RNS System to target these three thalamic nuclei. Presented here are the methods for target selection and device programming as well as clinical outcomes and a comparison of ictal and nonictal electrophysiological features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this small retrospective study ( N = 19), responsive corticothalamic neurostimulation was an effective therapy for 79% of patients (≥50% reduction in disabling seizure frequency), regardless of whether the thalamic lead was implanted in the ANT ( N = 2), PUL ( N = 6), or centromedian nucleus ( N = 11). Twenty-six percent of patients reported a reduction in disabling seizure frequency ≥90%. Both high frequency (≥100 Hz) and low (≤20 Hz) frequency were used to stimulate the thalamus depending on the patient's response and ability to tolerate higher charge densities. In all patients, a longer burst duration (2000-5000 ms) was ultimately implemented on the thalamic leads. Across patients, peaks in the intracranial EEG were observed at theta, beta, gamma, and sleep spindle frequencies. Changes in frequency content and distribution were observed over time in all three nuclei.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that both high frequency and low frequency corticothalamic responsive neurostimulation can potentially be an effective adjunctive therapy in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. These data can also contribute to a broader understanding of thalamic electrophysiology in the context of focal epilepsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"630-639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520339/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于丘脑与大脑皮层和其他皮层下结构有着广泛的相互连接,因此被认为是耐药局灶性癫痫神经调控的重要目标。使用皮质丘脑刺激可以同时调节丘脑和皮质癫痫发作起始区。已发表的有限临床经验表明,皮质-丘脑刺激的深度导线以丘脑前核(ANT)、丘脑中核(centromedian nucleus)或丘脑下核(PUL)中的一个为目标。然而,目前还不清楚哪个核团是 "最佳 "治疗目标:本研究包括一项单中心经验,即使用 RNS 系统针对这三个丘脑核进行皮质-丘脑反应性神经刺激。本文介绍了目标选择和设备编程的方法、临床结果以及发作期和非发作期电生理特点的比较:在这项小型回顾性研究中(N = 19),无论丘脑导联是植入 ANT(N = 2)、PUL(N = 6)还是中央核(N = 11),反应性皮质丘脑神经刺激对 79% 的患者都是一种有效的治疗方法(致残性发作频率降低≥50%)。26%的患者报告致残性癫痫发作频率降低了≥90%。高频(≥100 Hz)和低频(≤20 Hz)均用于刺激丘脑,具体取决于患者的反应和耐受较高电荷密度的能力。在所有患者中,丘脑导联最终都使用了较长的脉冲串持续时间(2000-5000 毫秒)。所有患者的颅内脑电图在θ、β、γ和睡眠纺锤频率上都出现了峰值。在所有三个核团中都观察到频率内容和分布随时间的变化:这些结果表明,高频和低频皮质-丘脑反应性神经刺激有可能成为治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫的有效辅助疗法。这些数据还有助于更广泛地了解局灶性癫痫的丘脑电生理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corticothalamic Responsive Neurostimulation for Focal Epilepsy: A Single-Center Experience.

Purpose: Owing to its extensive, reciprocal connectivity with the cortex and other subcortical structures, the thalamus is considered an important target for neuromodulation in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Using corticothalamic stimulation, it is possible to modulate both the thalamus and the cortical seizure onset zone. Limited published clinical experience describes corticothalamic stimulation with depth leads targeting one of the anterior (ANT), centromedian (centromedian nucleus), or pulvinar (PUL) thalamic nuclei. However, it is not clear which of these nuclei is the "best" therapeutic target.

Methods: This study comprised a single-center experience with corticothalamic responsive neurostimulation using the RNS System to target these three thalamic nuclei. Presented here are the methods for target selection and device programming as well as clinical outcomes and a comparison of ictal and nonictal electrophysiological features.

Results: In this small retrospective study ( N = 19), responsive corticothalamic neurostimulation was an effective therapy for 79% of patients (≥50% reduction in disabling seizure frequency), regardless of whether the thalamic lead was implanted in the ANT ( N = 2), PUL ( N = 6), or centromedian nucleus ( N = 11). Twenty-six percent of patients reported a reduction in disabling seizure frequency ≥90%. Both high frequency (≥100 Hz) and low (≤20 Hz) frequency were used to stimulate the thalamus depending on the patient's response and ability to tolerate higher charge densities. In all patients, a longer burst duration (2000-5000 ms) was ultimately implemented on the thalamic leads. Across patients, peaks in the intracranial EEG were observed at theta, beta, gamma, and sleep spindle frequencies. Changes in frequency content and distribution were observed over time in all three nuclei.

Conclusions: These results indicate that both high frequency and low frequency corticothalamic responsive neurostimulation can potentially be an effective adjunctive therapy in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. These data can also contribute to a broader understanding of thalamic electrophysiology in the context of focal epilepsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信