冷冻消融与射频消融治疗恶性肝肿瘤的元分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Hyperthermia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1080/02656736.2023.2300347
Xiangzhong Huang, Xinjian Xu, Hongtao Du, Qiulian Sun, Minyu Wu
{"title":"冷冻消融与射频消融治疗恶性肝肿瘤的元分析。","authors":"Xiangzhong Huang, Xinjian Xu, Hongtao Du, Qiulian Sun, Minyu Wu","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2023.2300347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of cryoablation (CRA) compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases was conducted to identify clinical controlled studies comparing CRA versus RFA for hepatic malignancies up to July 2022. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comprehensive analysis was conducted on 8 clinical controlled studies involving a total of 943 patients. There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications, complete ablation of lesions, local recurrence, and 1-year survival between the CRA and RFA groups (OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.61-1.55, <i>p</i> = 0.92; OR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.62-1.90, <i>p</i> = 0.78; OR = 1.28, 95%CI: 0.49-3.36, <i>p</i> = 0.61; and OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.63-2.06, <i>p</i> = 0.66, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy and safety profile of CRA was comparable to that of RFA in the context of ablation therapy for hepatic malignancies. These findings suggested that CRA may be a valuable alternative to RFA in the treatment of hepatic malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14137,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","volume":"41 1","pages":"2300347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of malignant liver tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangzhong Huang, Xinjian Xu, Hongtao Du, Qiulian Sun, Minyu Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02656736.2023.2300347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of cryoablation (CRA) compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases was conducted to identify clinical controlled studies comparing CRA versus RFA for hepatic malignancies up to July 2022. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comprehensive analysis was conducted on 8 clinical controlled studies involving a total of 943 patients. There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications, complete ablation of lesions, local recurrence, and 1-year survival between the CRA and RFA groups (OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.61-1.55, <i>p</i> = 0.92; OR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.62-1.90, <i>p</i> = 0.78; OR = 1.28, 95%CI: 0.49-3.36, <i>p</i> = 0.61; and OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.63-2.06, <i>p</i> = 0.66, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy and safety profile of CRA was comparable to that of RFA in the context of ablation therapy for hepatic malignancies. These findings suggested that CRA may be a valuable alternative to RFA in the treatment of hepatic malignancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Hyperthermia\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"2300347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Hyperthermia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2023.2300347\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2023.2300347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对冷冻消融术(CRA)与射频消融术(RFA)的疗效和安全性进行荟萃分析:方法:对冷冻消融术(CRA)与射频消融术(RFA)的疗效和安全性进行荟萃分析:对 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、万方、CNKI 和 VIP 数据库进行了系统检索,以确定截至 2022 年 7 月在肝脏恶性肿瘤方面比较 CRA 与 RFA 的临床对照研究。荟萃分析使用 RevMan 5.3.Results.进行:对8项临床对照研究进行了综合分析,共涉及943名患者。CRA组和RFA组在并发症发生率、病灶完全消融率、局部复发率和1年生存率方面无明显差异(OR = 0.98,95%CI:0.61-1.55,P = 0.92;OR = 1.08,95%CI:0.62-1.90,P = 0.78;OR = 1.28,95%CI:0.49-3.36,P = 0.61;OR = 1.14,95%CI:0.63-2.06,P = 0.66)。结论:结论:在肝脏恶性肿瘤消融治疗中,CRA的疗效和安全性与RFA相当。这些研究结果表明,在肝恶性肿瘤的治疗中,CRA可能是RFA的一种有价值的替代疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-analysis of cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of malignant liver tumors.

Objective: A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of cryoablation (CRA) compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases was conducted to identify clinical controlled studies comparing CRA versus RFA for hepatic malignancies up to July 2022. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

Results: A comprehensive analysis was conducted on 8 clinical controlled studies involving a total of 943 patients. There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications, complete ablation of lesions, local recurrence, and 1-year survival between the CRA and RFA groups (OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.61-1.55, p = 0.92; OR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.62-1.90, p = 0.78; OR = 1.28, 95%CI: 0.49-3.36, p = 0.61; and OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.63-2.06, p = 0.66, respectively).

Conclusion: The efficacy and safety profile of CRA was comparable to that of RFA in the context of ablation therapy for hepatic malignancies. These findings suggested that CRA may be a valuable alternative to RFA in the treatment of hepatic malignancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hyperthermia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信