Priyanka S Raghav, S Abirami, Abhinav Gupta, Faiz Noor Khan Yusufi, Shaista Afroz
{"title":"不同印模技术对修复体边缘密合度的影响--一项体外研究。","authors":"Priyanka S Raghav, S Abirami, Abhinav Gupta, Faiz Noor Khan Yusufi, Shaista Afroz","doi":"10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_991_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Impression making is one such important clinical step, which is critical in the accurate fitting of resulting prostheses. Impression making itself depends on the type of material and the impression technique used to record the details. Various combinations of material and the technique have been described in the literature.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of three different impression techniques on the marginal fit of computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) single unit composite fixed dental prostheses (FDP), different consistencies of addition silicone impression material and different tray design were utilized.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Impression of prepared tooth on typodont was made using Matrix impression system, two-step putty wash technique, and individual tooth tray technique. Prosthesis was fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and marginal accuracy was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In the present study, the matrix impression system resulted in less microgap in both mid-buccal and mid-mesial region, whereas putty wash technique showed very high standard deviation in the interproximal region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Matrix impression system had the best results at both mid-buccal and mid-mesial position with least marginal discrepancy.</p><p><strong>Clinical implication: </strong>The findings of this study could be used by clinicians to help them choose the viscosity of polyvinylsiloxane material and impression techniques for FDP that will result in high-accuracy impressions and well-fitting prostheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":13311,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of different impression techniques on marginal fit of restoration - An <i>In Vitro</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Priyanka S Raghav, S Abirami, Abhinav Gupta, Faiz Noor Khan Yusufi, Shaista Afroz\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_991_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Impression making is one such important clinical step, which is critical in the accurate fitting of resulting prostheses. Impression making itself depends on the type of material and the impression technique used to record the details. Various combinations of material and the technique have been described in the literature.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of three different impression techniques on the marginal fit of computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) single unit composite fixed dental prostheses (FDP), different consistencies of addition silicone impression material and different tray design were utilized.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Impression of prepared tooth on typodont was made using Matrix impression system, two-step putty wash technique, and individual tooth tray technique. Prosthesis was fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and marginal accuracy was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In the present study, the matrix impression system resulted in less microgap in both mid-buccal and mid-mesial region, whereas putty wash technique showed very high standard deviation in the interproximal region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Matrix impression system had the best results at both mid-buccal and mid-mesial position with least marginal discrepancy.</p><p><strong>Clinical implication: </strong>The findings of this study could be used by clinicians to help them choose the viscosity of polyvinylsiloxane material and impression techniques for FDP that will result in high-accuracy impressions and well-fitting prostheses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Dental Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_991_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_991_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:印模制作是一个重要的临床步骤,对于准确安装义齿至关重要。印模制作本身取决于材料的类型和用于记录细节的印模技术。目的:评估三种不同印模技术对计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)单体复合材料固定义齿(FDP)边缘密合度的影响,使用不同浓度的硅胶印模材料和不同的托盘设计:方法:使用 Matrix 印模系统、两步腻子清洗技术和单个牙托技术在正畸机上对准备好的牙齿进行印模。使用 CAD/CAM 技术制作假牙,并使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估边缘精度:结果:在本研究中,基质印模系统在颊中和颊颌中区域的微间隙较小,而腻子清洗技术在近端间区域显示出非常高的标准偏差:结论:矩阵印模系统在颊中和颌中位置的效果最好,边缘差最小:临床意义:这项研究的结果可用于帮助临床医生选择聚乙烯硅氧烷材料的粘度和 FDP 的印模技术,从而获得高精度的印模和合适的修复体。
Effect of different impression techniques on marginal fit of restoration - An In Vitro study.
Introduction: Impression making is one such important clinical step, which is critical in the accurate fitting of resulting prostheses. Impression making itself depends on the type of material and the impression technique used to record the details. Various combinations of material and the technique have been described in the literature.
Aim: To evaluate the effect of three different impression techniques on the marginal fit of computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) single unit composite fixed dental prostheses (FDP), different consistencies of addition silicone impression material and different tray design were utilized.
Method: Impression of prepared tooth on typodont was made using Matrix impression system, two-step putty wash technique, and individual tooth tray technique. Prosthesis was fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and marginal accuracy was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Result: In the present study, the matrix impression system resulted in less microgap in both mid-buccal and mid-mesial region, whereas putty wash technique showed very high standard deviation in the interproximal region.
Conclusion: Matrix impression system had the best results at both mid-buccal and mid-mesial position with least marginal discrepancy.
Clinical implication: The findings of this study could be used by clinicians to help them choose the viscosity of polyvinylsiloxane material and impression techniques for FDP that will result in high-accuracy impressions and well-fitting prostheses.
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Dental Research (IJDR) is the official publication of the Indian Society for Dental Research (ISDR), India section of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), published quarterly. IJDR publishes scientific papers on well designed and controlled original research involving orodental sciences. Papers may also include reports on unusual and interesting case presentations and invited review papers on significant topics.