基于人工智能的儿童焦虑评估创新数字量表的可靠性和有效性。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
R M Shetty, T Walia, O Ts Osman
{"title":"基于人工智能的儿童焦虑评估创新数字量表的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"R M Shetty, T Walia, O Ts Osman","doi":"10.23804/ejpd.2024.1937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the reliability and validity of an AI-based, innovative digital scale for the assessment of dental anxiety in children.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental anxiety still persists as a potential problem in managing the child in the dental office. There is a need to develop a gold standard scale to measure anxiety in children incorporating newer technology. An innovative self-reported scale known as RMSDigital Anxiety Scale (RMS-DAS) incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) was developed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six children (aged 4-12 years) were included in the reliability group. The RMS-DAS test score was recorded on Day 1 where the child was asked to click on the expression produced by AI that matches his/her anxiety level the most at that moment. RMS-DAS retest score was recorded after 7 days. The validity group included 140 children. The anxiety scores were recorded using three scales; RMS-DAS, RMS-Pictorial Scale (RMS-PS) and Facial Image Scale (FIS) during the same visit where the child was asked to click on the expression that matches his/her anxiety level the most at that moment. Reliability was assessed by the internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and the test-retest was assessed using paired t-test, scatterplot, and coefficient correlation. The validity of RMS-DAS was assessed by correlating it with RMS-PS and FIS using Spearman's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RMS-DAS is a reliable and valid scale that can be used as a new digital tool to assess children's dental anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11930,"journal":{"name":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":"25 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of artificial intelligence-based innovative digital scale for the assessment of anxiety in children.\",\"authors\":\"R M Shetty, T Walia, O Ts Osman\",\"doi\":\"10.23804/ejpd.2024.1937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the reliability and validity of an AI-based, innovative digital scale for the assessment of dental anxiety in children.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental anxiety still persists as a potential problem in managing the child in the dental office. There is a need to develop a gold standard scale to measure anxiety in children incorporating newer technology. An innovative self-reported scale known as RMSDigital Anxiety Scale (RMS-DAS) incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) was developed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six children (aged 4-12 years) were included in the reliability group. The RMS-DAS test score was recorded on Day 1 where the child was asked to click on the expression produced by AI that matches his/her anxiety level the most at that moment. RMS-DAS retest score was recorded after 7 days. The validity group included 140 children. The anxiety scores were recorded using three scales; RMS-DAS, RMS-Pictorial Scale (RMS-PS) and Facial Image Scale (FIS) during the same visit where the child was asked to click on the expression that matches his/her anxiety level the most at that moment. Reliability was assessed by the internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and the test-retest was assessed using paired t-test, scatterplot, and coefficient correlation. The validity of RMS-DAS was assessed by correlating it with RMS-PS and FIS using Spearman's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RMS-DAS is a reliable and valid scale that can be used as a new digital tool to assess children's dental anxiety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2024.1937\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2024.1937","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估基于人工智能的创新型数字量表在评估儿童牙科焦虑症方面的可靠性和有效性:背景:牙科焦虑仍然是牙科诊所管理儿童的一个潜在问题。因此,有必要结合新技术开发一种测量儿童焦虑症的金标准量表。我们开发了一种创新的自我报告量表,称为 RMSDigital Anxiety Scale (RMS-DAS),它结合了人工智能(AI):方法:76 名儿童(4-12 岁)被纳入可靠性组。第 1 天记录 RMS-DAS 测试得分,要求儿童点击人工智能产生的与他/她当时焦虑程度最匹配的表情。7 天后记录 RMS-DAS 复测得分。验证组包括 140 名儿童。在同一次就诊中,使用三个量表记录焦虑分数:RMS-DAS、RMS-Pictorial Scale (RMS-PS) 和 Facial Image Scale (FIS),并要求儿童点击与其当时焦虑程度最匹配的表情。信度采用 Cronbach's alpha 进行内部一致性评估,重测采用配对 t 检验、散点图和相关系数进行评估。通过使用斯皮尔曼相关系数将 RMS-DAS 与 RMS-PS 和 FIS 相关联,评估了 RMS-DAS 的有效性:RMS-DAS是一个可靠且有效的量表,可用作评估儿童牙科焦虑的新数字工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity of artificial intelligence-based innovative digital scale for the assessment of anxiety in children.

Aim: To assess the reliability and validity of an AI-based, innovative digital scale for the assessment of dental anxiety in children.

Background: Dental anxiety still persists as a potential problem in managing the child in the dental office. There is a need to develop a gold standard scale to measure anxiety in children incorporating newer technology. An innovative self-reported scale known as RMSDigital Anxiety Scale (RMS-DAS) incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) was developed.

Methods: Seventy-six children (aged 4-12 years) were included in the reliability group. The RMS-DAS test score was recorded on Day 1 where the child was asked to click on the expression produced by AI that matches his/her anxiety level the most at that moment. RMS-DAS retest score was recorded after 7 days. The validity group included 140 children. The anxiety scores were recorded using three scales; RMS-DAS, RMS-Pictorial Scale (RMS-PS) and Facial Image Scale (FIS) during the same visit where the child was asked to click on the expression that matches his/her anxiety level the most at that moment. Reliability was assessed by the internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and the test-retest was assessed using paired t-test, scatterplot, and coefficient correlation. The validity of RMS-DAS was assessed by correlating it with RMS-PS and FIS using Spearman's correlation coefficient.

Conclusion: RMS-DAS is a reliable and valid scale that can be used as a new digital tool to assess children's dental anxiety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of paediatric dentistry
European journal of paediatric dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim and scope of the European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry related to children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信