晚期黑色素瘤的单药与联合免疫疗法:证据综述。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Current Opinion in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1097/CCO.0000000000001014
Nada Benhima, Rhizlane Belbaraka, Mireille D Langouo Fontsa
{"title":"晚期黑色素瘤的单药与联合免疫疗法:证据综述。","authors":"Nada Benhima, Rhizlane Belbaraka, Mireille D Langouo Fontsa","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this review is to outline the current landscape of advanced melanoma treatment options, provide insights on selecting combination therapies within different clinical scenarios, capture clinical relevance of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy, and explore the unmet needs with immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) in advanced melanoma.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>ICI based treatment consisted of single agent ICI or dual combination ICI-ICI is the standard of care of front-line treatment of metastatic or unresectable melanoma. PD-1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab) improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors (Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab). The dual ICI combination (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) provided profound and durable responses better than monotherapy, and the longest overall survival ever achieved in advanced disease, including in patients with murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF)-mutated disease, but at the cost of a high risk of severe toxicity. The new dual blockage of LAG-3 and PD-1 (Nivolumab-Relatlimab) emerges as a valid option with promising efficacy outcomes and a favourable toxicity profile. Mature survival data is still needed to capture the real benefit.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>These new plethora of options pose new challenges not only for optimal treatment sequencing strategies but especially for management of adverse effects, endorsing the need to integrate a holistic and personalized approach for patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single agent vs combination immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: a review of the evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Nada Benhima, Rhizlane Belbaraka, Mireille D Langouo Fontsa\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this review is to outline the current landscape of advanced melanoma treatment options, provide insights on selecting combination therapies within different clinical scenarios, capture clinical relevance of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy, and explore the unmet needs with immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) in advanced melanoma.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>ICI based treatment consisted of single agent ICI or dual combination ICI-ICI is the standard of care of front-line treatment of metastatic or unresectable melanoma. PD-1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab) improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors (Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab). The dual ICI combination (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) provided profound and durable responses better than monotherapy, and the longest overall survival ever achieved in advanced disease, including in patients with murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF)-mutated disease, but at the cost of a high risk of severe toxicity. The new dual blockage of LAG-3 and PD-1 (Nivolumab-Relatlimab) emerges as a valid option with promising efficacy outcomes and a favourable toxicity profile. Mature survival data is still needed to capture the real benefit.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>These new plethora of options pose new challenges not only for optimal treatment sequencing strategies but especially for management of adverse effects, endorsing the need to integrate a holistic and personalized approach for patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述的目的:本综述旨在概述晚期黑色素瘤治疗方案的现状,提供在不同临床情况下选择联合疗法的见解,把握抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)单药疗法的临床意义,并探讨晚期黑色素瘤对免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)尚未满足的需求:基于 ICI 的治疗包括单药 ICI 或 ICI-ICI 双联用药,是转移性或不可切除黑色素瘤一线治疗的标准。与化疗和细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白4(CTLA-4)抑制剂(Ipilimumab和Tremelimumab)相比,PD-1抑制剂(Pembrolizumab和Nivolumab)可改善无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。ICI 双联疗法(Nivolumab 和 Ipilimumab)比单药疗法的反应更深入、更持久,在晚期疾病(包括鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物 B (BRAF)突变疾病患者)中的总生存期也是有史以来最长的,但代价是出现严重毒性的风险很高。新的LAG-3和PD-1双重阻断疗法(Nivolumab-Relatlimab)是一种有效的选择,具有良好的疗效和毒性。总结:这些新的选择不仅对最佳治疗排序策略,尤其是对不良反应的管理提出了新的挑战,同时也表明有必要整合整体和个性化的患者护理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single agent vs combination immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: a review of the evidence.

Purpose of review: The aim of this review is to outline the current landscape of advanced melanoma treatment options, provide insights on selecting combination therapies within different clinical scenarios, capture clinical relevance of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy, and explore the unmet needs with immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) in advanced melanoma.

Recent findings: ICI based treatment consisted of single agent ICI or dual combination ICI-ICI is the standard of care of front-line treatment of metastatic or unresectable melanoma. PD-1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab) improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors (Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab). The dual ICI combination (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) provided profound and durable responses better than monotherapy, and the longest overall survival ever achieved in advanced disease, including in patients with murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF)-mutated disease, but at the cost of a high risk of severe toxicity. The new dual blockage of LAG-3 and PD-1 (Nivolumab-Relatlimab) emerges as a valid option with promising efficacy outcomes and a favourable toxicity profile. Mature survival data is still needed to capture the real benefit.

Summary: These new plethora of options pose new challenges not only for optimal treatment sequencing strategies but especially for management of adverse effects, endorsing the need to integrate a holistic and personalized approach for patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信