睑板腺功能障碍患病率的性别差异:微型综述。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Current Eye Research Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1080/02713683.2023.2301325
Sara T Nøland, Morten S Magnø, Tor P Utheim, Xiangjun Chen
{"title":"睑板腺功能障碍患病率的性别差异:微型综述。","authors":"Sara T Nøland, Morten S Magnø, Tor P Utheim, Xiangjun Chen","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2023.2301325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this review, we aimed to investigate the literature on sex-specific prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and to determine whether women or men are more at risk for MGD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted on PubMed using the terms: <i>(Sex OR Gender OR prevalence) AND (Meibomian gland)</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four relevant studies on MGD prevalence were identified, including 10 population-based and 14 hospital-based studies. Among the population-based studies, five studies reported higher rates among men, three studies found no differences, and one study observed higher rates among women. In the hospital-based studies, 10 studies reported no difference, two found higher rates among men, and one found higher among women. In the reviewed literature, there was a considerable variation between studies in terms of quality, sample size, age ranges, diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While most of the population-based studies suggest a higher prevalence among men, the majority of clinic-based studies show no significant difference. Further research with larger samples and standardized criteria is needed to determine whether men are indeed more susceptible to MGD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Mini Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sara T Nøland, Morten S Magnø, Tor P Utheim, Xiangjun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02713683.2023.2301325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this review, we aimed to investigate the literature on sex-specific prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and to determine whether women or men are more at risk for MGD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted on PubMed using the terms: <i>(Sex OR Gender OR prevalence) AND (Meibomian gland)</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four relevant studies on MGD prevalence were identified, including 10 population-based and 14 hospital-based studies. Among the population-based studies, five studies reported higher rates among men, three studies found no differences, and one study observed higher rates among women. In the hospital-based studies, 10 studies reported no difference, two found higher rates among men, and one found higher among women. In the reviewed literature, there was a considerable variation between studies in terms of quality, sample size, age ranges, diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While most of the population-based studies suggest a higher prevalence among men, the majority of clinic-based studies show no significant difference. Further research with larger samples and standardized criteria is needed to determine whether men are indeed more susceptible to MGD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2023.2301325\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2023.2301325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在这篇综述中,我们旨在调查有关睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)特定性别患病率的文献,并确定是女性还是男性更容易患上睑板腺功能障碍:方法:在PubMed上使用以下术语进行搜索:(性别或性别或患病率)和(睑板腺):结果:共发现 24 项有关睑板腺肥大发病率的相关研究,包括 10 项基于人群的研究和 14 项基于医院的研究。在基于人口的研究中,有五项研究报告男性的发病率较高,三项研究发现没有差异,一项研究观察到女性的发病率较高。在以医院为基础的研究中,10 项研究没有发现差异,2 项研究发现男性发病率较高,1 项研究发现女性发病率较高。在审查过的文献中,不同研究在质量、样本大小、年龄范围、诊断标准等方面存在很大差异:结论:虽然大多数基于人群的研究表明男性的患病率较高,但大多数基于诊所的研究却没有显示出明显的差异。要确定男性是否真的更易患颅内压增高症,还需要进行更大规模的样本和标准化标准的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Mini Review.

Purpose: In this review, we aimed to investigate the literature on sex-specific prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and to determine whether women or men are more at risk for MGD.

Methods: A search was conducted on PubMed using the terms: (Sex OR Gender OR prevalence) AND (Meibomian gland).

Results: Twenty-four relevant studies on MGD prevalence were identified, including 10 population-based and 14 hospital-based studies. Among the population-based studies, five studies reported higher rates among men, three studies found no differences, and one study observed higher rates among women. In the hospital-based studies, 10 studies reported no difference, two found higher rates among men, and one found higher among women. In the reviewed literature, there was a considerable variation between studies in terms of quality, sample size, age ranges, diagnostic criteria.

Conclusions: While most of the population-based studies suggest a higher prevalence among men, the majority of clinic-based studies show no significant difference. Further research with larger samples and standardized criteria is needed to determine whether men are indeed more susceptible to MGD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Eye Research
Current Eye Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信