机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术五年:初步经验与手术效果。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Acta Chirurgica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1080/00015458.2024.2304386
Van Zande Jaro, Krick Marc, Willaert Bart, Van Den Heede Klaas
{"title":"机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术五年:初步经验与手术效果。","authors":"Van Zande Jaro, Krick Marc, Willaert Bart, Van Den Heede Klaas","doi":"10.1080/00015458.2024.2304386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair (RVHR) has become a feasible alternative for open ventral hernia repair showing fewer postoperative complications and satisfying short-term results. However, long-term results are scarce in current literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery for ventral hernias from June 2018 until February 2023 were included. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for indication, need for conversion, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.In addition, long-term (>24 months) results (recurrence, chronic pain, and esthetic satisfaction) were assessed by phone questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 177 patients underwent a robot-assisted ventral hernia repair. Indication for surgery was incisional hernia (<i>N</i> = 109) and primary hernia (<i>N</i> = 68), including 124 cases with abdominal rectus diastasis. A TransAbdominal Retromuscular Umbilical Prosthesis (TARUP) was performed in 138 patients. Robotic Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) and Extended Totally Extraperitoneal Repair (eTEP) were performed in 20 (11%) and 9 (5%) cases, respectively.Median LOS was 2 days for TARUP and 3.5 days for TAR. Minor complications occurred in 22 patients (16 TARUP, 5 TAR, 1 eTEP). The average pain score on the first postoperative day was 1.8/10. No risk factors for morbidity could be identified by uni- and multivariable analysis.Hernia recurrence developed in four (2%) patients. Chronic pain was reported in two (1%) cases. Seven (4%) patients had esthetic complaints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair is a safe procedure with low postoperative pain and short LOS. Long-term results including recurrence and chronic pain are satisfying.</p>","PeriodicalId":6935,"journal":{"name":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Five years of robot-assisted ventral hernia repair: initial experience and surgical outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Van Zande Jaro, Krick Marc, Willaert Bart, Van Den Heede Klaas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00015458.2024.2304386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair (RVHR) has become a feasible alternative for open ventral hernia repair showing fewer postoperative complications and satisfying short-term results. However, long-term results are scarce in current literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery for ventral hernias from June 2018 until February 2023 were included. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for indication, need for conversion, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.In addition, long-term (>24 months) results (recurrence, chronic pain, and esthetic satisfaction) were assessed by phone questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 177 patients underwent a robot-assisted ventral hernia repair. Indication for surgery was incisional hernia (<i>N</i> = 109) and primary hernia (<i>N</i> = 68), including 124 cases with abdominal rectus diastasis. A TransAbdominal Retromuscular Umbilical Prosthesis (TARUP) was performed in 138 patients. Robotic Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) and Extended Totally Extraperitoneal Repair (eTEP) were performed in 20 (11%) and 9 (5%) cases, respectively.Median LOS was 2 days for TARUP and 3.5 days for TAR. Minor complications occurred in 22 patients (16 TARUP, 5 TAR, 1 eTEP). The average pain score on the first postoperative day was 1.8/10. No risk factors for morbidity could be identified by uni- and multivariable analysis.Hernia recurrence developed in four (2%) patients. Chronic pain was reported in two (1%) cases. Seven (4%) patients had esthetic complaints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair is a safe procedure with low postoperative pain and short LOS. Long-term results including recurrence and chronic pain are satisfying.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Chirurgica Belgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Chirurgica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2024.2304386\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2024.2304386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术(RVHR机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术(RVHR)已成为开放性腹股沟疝修补术的可行替代方案,术后并发症少,短期效果令人满意。然而,目前的文献中缺乏长期结果:纳入2018年6月至2023年2月期间所有接受机器人辅助手术治疗腹股沟疝的连续患者。此外,还通过电话问卷评估了长期(>24 个月)结果(复发、慢性疼痛和美学满意度):共有177名患者接受了机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术。手术指征为切口疝(109例)和原发性疝(68例),其中124例伴有腹直肌腹膜膨出。138名患者接受了经腹再肌性脐假体(TARUP)手术。TARUP的中位住院日为2天,TAR的中位住院日为3.5天。22例患者(16例TARUP、5例TAR、1例eTEP)出现轻微并发症。术后第一天的平均疼痛评分为 1.8/10。通过单变量和多变量分析,未发现发病风险因素。有两例(1%)患者出现慢性疼痛。结论:机器人辅助腹股沟疝气切除术是一种新的手术方式:机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术是一种安全的手术,术后疼痛轻,住院时间短。结论:机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术是一种安全的手术,术后疼痛轻,住院时间短,包括复发和慢性疼痛在内的长期效果令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Five years of robot-assisted ventral hernia repair: initial experience and surgical outcome.

Objective: Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair (RVHR) has become a feasible alternative for open ventral hernia repair showing fewer postoperative complications and satisfying short-term results. However, long-term results are scarce in current literature.

Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery for ventral hernias from June 2018 until February 2023 were included. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for indication, need for conversion, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.In addition, long-term (>24 months) results (recurrence, chronic pain, and esthetic satisfaction) were assessed by phone questionnaire.

Results: In total, 177 patients underwent a robot-assisted ventral hernia repair. Indication for surgery was incisional hernia (N = 109) and primary hernia (N = 68), including 124 cases with abdominal rectus diastasis. A TransAbdominal Retromuscular Umbilical Prosthesis (TARUP) was performed in 138 patients. Robotic Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) and Extended Totally Extraperitoneal Repair (eTEP) were performed in 20 (11%) and 9 (5%) cases, respectively.Median LOS was 2 days for TARUP and 3.5 days for TAR. Minor complications occurred in 22 patients (16 TARUP, 5 TAR, 1 eTEP). The average pain score on the first postoperative day was 1.8/10. No risk factors for morbidity could be identified by uni- and multivariable analysis.Hernia recurrence developed in four (2%) patients. Chronic pain was reported in two (1%) cases. Seven (4%) patients had esthetic complaints.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair is a safe procedure with low postoperative pain and short LOS. Long-term results including recurrence and chronic pain are satisfying.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Acta Chirurgica Belgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Chirurgica Belgica (ACB) is the official journal of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery (RBSS) and its affiliated societies. It publishes Editorials, Review papers, Original Research, and Technique related manuscripts in the broad field of Clinical Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信