应用罗布森分类法作为标准化分娩管理的有效方法。降低剖腹产率的练习。

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
L. Pastor , R. Garcia-Jimenez , I. Valero , C. Borrero , L. Castro , J.A. Garcia-Mejido , J.A. Sainz Bueno
{"title":"应用罗布森分类法作为标准化分娩管理的有效方法。降低剖腹产率的练习。","authors":"L. Pastor ,&nbsp;R. Garcia-Jimenez ,&nbsp;I. Valero ,&nbsp;C. Borrero ,&nbsp;L. Castro ,&nbsp;J.A. Garcia-Mejido ,&nbsp;J.A. Sainz Bueno","doi":"10.1016/j.gine.2023.100935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cesarean section rate is controversial and the Robson classification is a method for standardizing the evaluation of the causes of cesarean section. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the measures to improve prenatal and intrapartum management implemented after the Robson classification evaluation lead to a decrease in the rate of cesarean sections without increasing the rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Quasi-experimental study before-after,between-2019 and 2020, including a total of 2181 patients with delivery at Hospital-Universitario-Valme(1027 patients in Group-2019, and 1154 patients in group-2020)..</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed that there was a statistically significant decrease in the cesarean section rate between 2019 and 2020 (21.0% vs 15.8%; p = 0.001) without the decrease being significant in any study subgroup. There was a lower rate of induced labor(29.3% vs 24.6%; p = 0.01), an increased rate of vaginal delivery (79.0% vs 84.2%; p = 0.001), both eutocic and instrumental deliveries (57.9% vs 60.3%; 21% vs 23.9%; p = 0.005) and a statistically significant decrease in the rate of cesarean sections due to failure of induction or non-progression of labor(34.7% vs 20.9%;p = 0.008). In inductions using the balloon-Cook we observed a decrease in the rate of cesarean section (45.3% versus 22.2% p = 0.001). We found a decrease in the percentage of admission to the Neonatal ICU (10.5% vs 7.6%; p = 0.016) and global neonatal morbidity(11.4% vs 8.2%; p = 0.013) without observing a difference in maternal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The application of the Robson classification can be a useful method to identify groups that require the application of specific measures aimed at standardizing the management of these patients, thus allowing to reduce the rate of cesarean sections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41294,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 100935"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aplicación de la clasificación de Robson como método útil para estandarizar el manejo del parto. Un ejercicio que reduce la tasa de cesáreas\",\"authors\":\"L. Pastor ,&nbsp;R. Garcia-Jimenez ,&nbsp;I. Valero ,&nbsp;C. Borrero ,&nbsp;L. Castro ,&nbsp;J.A. Garcia-Mejido ,&nbsp;J.A. Sainz Bueno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gine.2023.100935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cesarean section rate is controversial and the Robson classification is a method for standardizing the evaluation of the causes of cesarean section. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the measures to improve prenatal and intrapartum management implemented after the Robson classification evaluation lead to a decrease in the rate of cesarean sections without increasing the rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Quasi-experimental study before-after,between-2019 and 2020, including a total of 2181 patients with delivery at Hospital-Universitario-Valme(1027 patients in Group-2019, and 1154 patients in group-2020)..</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed that there was a statistically significant decrease in the cesarean section rate between 2019 and 2020 (21.0% vs 15.8%; p = 0.001) without the decrease being significant in any study subgroup. There was a lower rate of induced labor(29.3% vs 24.6%; p = 0.01), an increased rate of vaginal delivery (79.0% vs 84.2%; p = 0.001), both eutocic and instrumental deliveries (57.9% vs 60.3%; 21% vs 23.9%; p = 0.005) and a statistically significant decrease in the rate of cesarean sections due to failure of induction or non-progression of labor(34.7% vs 20.9%;p = 0.008). In inductions using the balloon-Cook we observed a decrease in the rate of cesarean section (45.3% versus 22.2% p = 0.001). We found a decrease in the percentage of admission to the Neonatal ICU (10.5% vs 7.6%; p = 0.016) and global neonatal morbidity(11.4% vs 8.2%; p = 0.013) without observing a difference in maternal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The application of the Robson classification can be a useful method to identify groups that require the application of specific measures aimed at standardizing the management of these patients, thus allowing to reduce the rate of cesarean sections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X23001053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X23001053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景剖宫产率存在争议,罗布森分类法是对剖宫产原因进行标准化评估的一种方法。本研究旨在评估罗布森分类评估后实施的产前和产时管理改进措施是否会降低剖宫产率,同时不增加新生儿和孕产妇的发病率和死亡率。材料与方法在2019年和2020年之间进行了前后对比的准实验研究,共纳入了2181名在瓦尔米大学医院分娩的患者(2019年组1027名患者,2020年组1154名患者)。 结果我们发现,2019年和2020年之间的剖宫产率在统计学上有显著下降(21.0% vs 15.8%;P = 0.001),但在任何研究亚组中下降幅度都不大。引产率降低(29.3% vs 24.6%;p = 0.01),阴道分娩率上升(79.0% vs 84.2%;p = 0.001),顺产和器械助产率均上升(57.9% vs 60.3%;21% vs 23.9%;p = 0.005),因引产失败或产程未进展而进行剖宫产的比例有显著下降(34.7% vs 20.9%;p = 0.008)。在使用气囊库进行引产时,我们观察到剖宫产率有所下降(45.3% 对 22.2%; p = 0.001)。我们发现,新生儿重症监护室的入院率(10.5% 对 7.6%;P = 0.016)和新生儿总体发病率(11.4% 对 8.2%;P = 0.013)均有所下降,但孕产妇的预后并无差异。结论罗布森分类法的应用是一种有用的方法,可用于确定哪些群体需要采取特定措施来规范这些患者的管理,从而降低剖宫产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aplicación de la clasificación de Robson como método útil para estandarizar el manejo del parto. Un ejercicio que reduce la tasa de cesáreas

Background

Cesarean section rate is controversial and the Robson classification is a method for standardizing the evaluation of the causes of cesarean section. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the measures to improve prenatal and intrapartum management implemented after the Robson classification evaluation lead to a decrease in the rate of cesarean sections without increasing the rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality.

Material and method

Quasi-experimental study before-after,between-2019 and 2020, including a total of 2181 patients with delivery at Hospital-Universitario-Valme(1027 patients in Group-2019, and 1154 patients in group-2020)..

Results

We observed that there was a statistically significant decrease in the cesarean section rate between 2019 and 2020 (21.0% vs 15.8%; p = 0.001) without the decrease being significant in any study subgroup. There was a lower rate of induced labor(29.3% vs 24.6%; p = 0.01), an increased rate of vaginal delivery (79.0% vs 84.2%; p = 0.001), both eutocic and instrumental deliveries (57.9% vs 60.3%; 21% vs 23.9%; p = 0.005) and a statistically significant decrease in the rate of cesarean sections due to failure of induction or non-progression of labor(34.7% vs 20.9%;p = 0.008). In inductions using the balloon-Cook we observed a decrease in the rate of cesarean section (45.3% versus 22.2% p = 0.001). We found a decrease in the percentage of admission to the Neonatal ICU (10.5% vs 7.6%; p = 0.016) and global neonatal morbidity(11.4% vs 8.2%; p = 0.013) without observing a difference in maternal outcomes.

Conclusions

The application of the Robson classification can be a useful method to identify groups that require the application of specific measures aimed at standardizing the management of these patients, thus allowing to reduce the rate of cesarean sections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Una excelente publicación para mantenerse al día en los temas de máximo interés de la ginecología de vanguardia. Resulta idónea tanto para el especialista en ginecología, como en obstetricia o en pediatría, y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信