培训儿科医师和工作人员从电子健康记录中获取数据

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Tiranun Rungvivatjarus , Amy Z. Chong , Aarti Patel , Manaswitha Khare , Mario Bialostozky , Cynthia L. Kuelbs
{"title":"培训儿科医师和工作人员从电子健康记录中获取数据","authors":"Tiranun Rungvivatjarus ,&nbsp;Amy Z. Chong ,&nbsp;Aarti Patel ,&nbsp;Manaswitha Khare ,&nbsp;Mario Bialostozky ,&nbsp;Cynthia L. Kuelbs","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2023.100733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electronic health records (EHRs) have provided physicians with user-friendly self-service reporting tools to extract patient data from the EHR. Despite such benefits, physician training on how to use these tools has been limited. At our institution, physicians were faced with prolonged wait time for EHR data extraction requests and were unaware of self-service reporting tool availability in the EHR. Our goal was to develop an EHR data reporting curriculum for physicians and staff and examine the effectiveness of such training. In 2019, physician informaticists developed two interactive sessions to train physicians and staff on self-service reporting tools (Epic® SlicerDicer and Reporting Workbench (RWB)) available in our tertiary children’s hospital EHR. We assessed participants' knowledge, confidence, and tool utilization before, after, and 3-months post training via survey. Training sessions occurred between April and August 2021. Thirty-six participants completed the study, with 25 surveys collected immediately post and 22 surveys collected at 3-months post training. Data literacy knowledge pre-test average score improved from 62% to 93% (p &lt; 0.05) immediately post-session and 74% at 3-months post assessment (p = 0.05). Regular tool utilization increased from 29% (RWB) and 34% (SlicerDicer) pre-session to 56% and 44% at 3-months post, respectively. Participants reported increased confidence in performing SlicerDicer model selection, criteria selection, and data visualization as well as RWB report navigation, report creation, report visualization, and describing report’s benefits/limitations. Ultimately, physician and staff self-service reporting tools training were effective in increasing data literacy knowledge, tool utilization, and confidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"12 1","pages":"Article 100733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642300060X/pdfft?md5=46fbd8db8e881b156acdea1939149547&pid=1-s2.0-S221307642300060X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training pediatric physicians and staff to obtain data from the electronic health record\",\"authors\":\"Tiranun Rungvivatjarus ,&nbsp;Amy Z. Chong ,&nbsp;Aarti Patel ,&nbsp;Manaswitha Khare ,&nbsp;Mario Bialostozky ,&nbsp;Cynthia L. Kuelbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2023.100733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Electronic health records (EHRs) have provided physicians with user-friendly self-service reporting tools to extract patient data from the EHR. Despite such benefits, physician training on how to use these tools has been limited. At our institution, physicians were faced with prolonged wait time for EHR data extraction requests and were unaware of self-service reporting tool availability in the EHR. Our goal was to develop an EHR data reporting curriculum for physicians and staff and examine the effectiveness of such training. In 2019, physician informaticists developed two interactive sessions to train physicians and staff on self-service reporting tools (Epic® SlicerDicer and Reporting Workbench (RWB)) available in our tertiary children’s hospital EHR. We assessed participants' knowledge, confidence, and tool utilization before, after, and 3-months post training via survey. Training sessions occurred between April and August 2021. Thirty-six participants completed the study, with 25 surveys collected immediately post and 22 surveys collected at 3-months post training. Data literacy knowledge pre-test average score improved from 62% to 93% (p &lt; 0.05) immediately post-session and 74% at 3-months post assessment (p = 0.05). Regular tool utilization increased from 29% (RWB) and 34% (SlicerDicer) pre-session to 56% and 44% at 3-months post, respectively. Participants reported increased confidence in performing SlicerDicer model selection, criteria selection, and data visualization as well as RWB report navigation, report creation, report visualization, and describing report’s benefits/limitations. Ultimately, physician and staff self-service reporting tools training were effective in increasing data literacy knowledge, tool utilization, and confidence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642300060X/pdfft?md5=46fbd8db8e881b156acdea1939149547&pid=1-s2.0-S221307642300060X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642300060X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642300060X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子病历(EHR)为医生提供了用户友好的自助报告工具,以便从 EHR 中提取患者数据。尽管有这些好处,但对医生如何使用这些工具的培训却很有限。在我们所在的机构,医生们面临着漫长的 EHR 数据提取请求等待时间,而且不知道 EHR 中是否有自助报告工具。我们的目标是为医生和员工开发电子病历数据报告课程,并检查此类培训的效果。2019 年,医生信息学家开发了两节互动课程,对医生和员工进行有关自助报告工具(Epic® SlicerDicer 和 Reporting Workbench (RWB))的培训,这些工具可在我们的三级儿童医院 EHR 中使用。我们在培训前、培训后和培训后 3 个月通过调查对参与者的知识、信心和工具使用情况进行了评估。培训课程于 2021 年 4 月至 8 月间进行。36 名参与者完成了研究,其中 25 份调查问卷是在培训后立即收集的,22 份调查问卷是在培训后 3 个月收集的。数据扫盲知识测试前的平均得分从 62% 提高到培训后的 93%(p < 0.05),培训后 3 个月的平均得分为 74%(p = 0.05)。常规工具的使用率分别从课前的 29% (RWB)和 34%(SlicerDicer)提高到课后 3 个月的 56% 和 44%。参加者表示,在进行 SlicerDicer 模型选择、标准选择和数据可视化以及 RWB 报告导航、报告创建、报告可视化和报告优点/局限性描述方面的信心都有所增强。最终,医生和员工自助报告工具培训有效地提高了数据扫盲知识、工具使用率和信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training pediatric physicians and staff to obtain data from the electronic health record

Electronic health records (EHRs) have provided physicians with user-friendly self-service reporting tools to extract patient data from the EHR. Despite such benefits, physician training on how to use these tools has been limited. At our institution, physicians were faced with prolonged wait time for EHR data extraction requests and were unaware of self-service reporting tool availability in the EHR. Our goal was to develop an EHR data reporting curriculum for physicians and staff and examine the effectiveness of such training. In 2019, physician informaticists developed two interactive sessions to train physicians and staff on self-service reporting tools (Epic® SlicerDicer and Reporting Workbench (RWB)) available in our tertiary children’s hospital EHR. We assessed participants' knowledge, confidence, and tool utilization before, after, and 3-months post training via survey. Training sessions occurred between April and August 2021. Thirty-six participants completed the study, with 25 surveys collected immediately post and 22 surveys collected at 3-months post training. Data literacy knowledge pre-test average score improved from 62% to 93% (p < 0.05) immediately post-session and 74% at 3-months post assessment (p = 0.05). Regular tool utilization increased from 29% (RWB) and 34% (SlicerDicer) pre-session to 56% and 44% at 3-months post, respectively. Participants reported increased confidence in performing SlicerDicer model selection, criteria selection, and data visualization as well as RWB report navigation, report creation, report visualization, and describing report’s benefits/limitations. Ultimately, physician and staff self-service reporting tools training were effective in increasing data literacy knowledge, tool utilization, and confidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信