在妇女人群研究中使用骨冲击微压痕技术的实用性:吉隆-骨质疏松症研究

IF 2.1 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Pamela Rufus-Membere , Kara B. Anderson , Kara L. Holloway-Kew , Jacob W. Harland , Adolfo Diez-Perez , Mark A. Kotowicz , Julie A. Pasco
{"title":"在妇女人群研究中使用骨冲击微压痕技术的实用性:吉隆-骨质疏松症研究","authors":"Pamela Rufus-Membere ,&nbsp;Kara B. Anderson ,&nbsp;Kara L. Holloway-Kew ,&nbsp;Jacob W. Harland ,&nbsp;Adolfo Diez-Perez ,&nbsp;Mark A. Kotowicz ,&nbsp;Julie A. Pasco","doi":"10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Impact microindentation (IMI) is a minimally invasive technique that allows the assessment of bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo, by measuring the depth of a micron-sized, spherical tip into cortical bone that is then indexed to the depth of the tip into a reference material. In this study, we aimed to assess the practicality of its application in 99 women aged 42-84 yr from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Impact microindentation was performed in the mid-shaft of the right tibia using the OsteoProbe. Immediately following measurement, each participant was requested to rate on a Visual Analogue Scale [0−10] the level of discomfort anticipated and experienced, any initial reluctance towards the measurement and whether they were willing to repeat the measurement. Of 99 potential participants who attended this assessment phase, 55 underwent IMI measurement. Reasons for non-measurement in 44 women were existing skin conditions (<em>n</em> = 8, 18.2 %) and excessive soft tissue around mid-tibial region (<em>n</em> = 32, 72.2 %). An additional four (9.1 %) participants did not provide any reasons for declining. For 55 participants who had underwent IMI, the expectation for pain when briefed about the procedure was low (2.28 ± 2.39), as was pain experienced during the measurement (0.72 ± 1.58). Participants were not reluctant to undergo the measurement (0.83 ± 1.67), and all indicated a willingness to repeat the measurement. Results of this study showed that the IMI technique is well tolerated and accepted by women participating in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study, suggesting that the technique shows promise in a research or clinical setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9043,"journal":{"name":"Bone Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187223000797/pdfft?md5=ce382801b3f6cefde8325f81ca01d850&pid=1-s2.0-S2352187223000797-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The practicality of using bone impact microindentation in a population-based study of women: A Geelong-Osteoporosis Study\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Rufus-Membere ,&nbsp;Kara B. Anderson ,&nbsp;Kara L. Holloway-Kew ,&nbsp;Jacob W. Harland ,&nbsp;Adolfo Diez-Perez ,&nbsp;Mark A. Kotowicz ,&nbsp;Julie A. Pasco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Impact microindentation (IMI) is a minimally invasive technique that allows the assessment of bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo, by measuring the depth of a micron-sized, spherical tip into cortical bone that is then indexed to the depth of the tip into a reference material. In this study, we aimed to assess the practicality of its application in 99 women aged 42-84 yr from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Impact microindentation was performed in the mid-shaft of the right tibia using the OsteoProbe. Immediately following measurement, each participant was requested to rate on a Visual Analogue Scale [0−10] the level of discomfort anticipated and experienced, any initial reluctance towards the measurement and whether they were willing to repeat the measurement. Of 99 potential participants who attended this assessment phase, 55 underwent IMI measurement. Reasons for non-measurement in 44 women were existing skin conditions (<em>n</em> = 8, 18.2 %) and excessive soft tissue around mid-tibial region (<em>n</em> = 32, 72.2 %). An additional four (9.1 %) participants did not provide any reasons for declining. For 55 participants who had underwent IMI, the expectation for pain when briefed about the procedure was low (2.28 ± 2.39), as was pain experienced during the measurement (0.72 ± 1.58). Participants were not reluctant to undergo the measurement (0.83 ± 1.67), and all indicated a willingness to repeat the measurement. Results of this study showed that the IMI technique is well tolerated and accepted by women participating in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study, suggesting that the technique shows promise in a research or clinical setting.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone Reports\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187223000797/pdfft?md5=ce382801b3f6cefde8325f81ca01d850&pid=1-s2.0-S2352187223000797-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187223000797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187223000797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冲击微压痕(IMI)是一种微创技术,可通过测量微米大小的球形尖端进入皮质骨的深度来评估体内骨材料强度指数(BMSi)。在这项研究中,我们的目的是在吉隆骨质疏松症研究的 99 名 42-84 岁女性中评估其应用的实用性。我们使用 OsteoProbe 在右胫骨中轴进行了冲击微压痕测量。测量结束后,每位参与者需立即用视觉模拟量表[0-10]对预期和经历的不适程度、最初对测量的不情愿程度以及是否愿意重复测量进行评分。在参加这一评估阶段的 99 名潜在参与者中,有 55 人接受了 IMI 测量。44 名妇女未进行测量的原因是存在皮肤问题(8 人,占 18.2%)和胫骨中段软组织过多(32 人,占 72.2%)。另有 4 名参与者(9.1%)未提供任何拒绝原因。在 55 位接受过 IMI 的参与者中,他们在了解手术情况时对疼痛的预期较低(2.28 ± 2.39),在测量过程中的疼痛预期也较低(0.72 ± 1.58)。参与者并不抗拒接受测量(0.83 ± 1.67),而且都表示愿意重复测量。这项研究的结果表明,参与吉隆骨质疏松症研究的妇女对 IMI 技术的耐受性和接受度都很好,这表明该技术在研究或临床环境中大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The practicality of using bone impact microindentation in a population-based study of women: A Geelong-Osteoporosis Study

Impact microindentation (IMI) is a minimally invasive technique that allows the assessment of bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo, by measuring the depth of a micron-sized, spherical tip into cortical bone that is then indexed to the depth of the tip into a reference material. In this study, we aimed to assess the practicality of its application in 99 women aged 42-84 yr from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Impact microindentation was performed in the mid-shaft of the right tibia using the OsteoProbe. Immediately following measurement, each participant was requested to rate on a Visual Analogue Scale [0−10] the level of discomfort anticipated and experienced, any initial reluctance towards the measurement and whether they were willing to repeat the measurement. Of 99 potential participants who attended this assessment phase, 55 underwent IMI measurement. Reasons for non-measurement in 44 women were existing skin conditions (n = 8, 18.2 %) and excessive soft tissue around mid-tibial region (n = 32, 72.2 %). An additional four (9.1 %) participants did not provide any reasons for declining. For 55 participants who had underwent IMI, the expectation for pain when briefed about the procedure was low (2.28 ± 2.39), as was pain experienced during the measurement (0.72 ± 1.58). Participants were not reluctant to undergo the measurement (0.83 ± 1.67), and all indicated a willingness to repeat the measurement. Results of this study showed that the IMI technique is well tolerated and accepted by women participating in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study, suggesting that the technique shows promise in a research or clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone Reports
Bone Reports Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Bone Reports is an interdisciplinary forum for the rapid publication of Original Research Articles and Case Reports across basic, translational and clinical aspects of bone and mineral metabolism. The journal publishes papers that are scientifically sound, with the peer review process focused principally on verifying sound methodologies, and correct data analysis and interpretation. We welcome studies either replicating or failing to replicate a previous study, and null findings. We fulfil a critical and current need to enhance research by publishing reproducibility studies and null findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信