Pamela Rufus-Membere , Kara B. Anderson , Kara L. Holloway-Kew , Jacob W. Harland , Adolfo Diez-Perez , Mark A. Kotowicz , Julie A. Pasco
{"title":"在妇女人群研究中使用骨冲击微压痕技术的实用性:吉隆-骨质疏松症研究","authors":"Pamela Rufus-Membere , Kara B. Anderson , Kara L. Holloway-Kew , Jacob W. Harland , Adolfo Diez-Perez , Mark A. Kotowicz , Julie A. Pasco","doi":"10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Impact microindentation (IMI) is a minimally invasive technique that allows the assessment of bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo, by measuring the depth of a micron-sized, spherical tip into cortical bone that is then indexed to the depth of the tip into a reference material. In this study, we aimed to assess the practicality of its application in 99 women aged 42-84 yr from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Impact microindentation was performed in the mid-shaft of the right tibia using the OsteoProbe. Immediately following measurement, each participant was requested to rate on a Visual Analogue Scale [0−10] the level of discomfort anticipated and experienced, any initial reluctance towards the measurement and whether they were willing to repeat the measurement. Of 99 potential participants who attended this assessment phase, 55 underwent IMI measurement. Reasons for non-measurement in 44 women were existing skin conditions (<em>n</em> = 8, 18.2 %) and excessive soft tissue around mid-tibial region (<em>n</em> = 32, 72.2 %). An additional four (9.1 %) participants did not provide any reasons for declining. For 55 participants who had underwent IMI, the expectation for pain when briefed about the procedure was low (2.28 ± 2.39), as was pain experienced during the measurement (0.72 ± 1.58). Participants were not reluctant to undergo the measurement (0.83 ± 1.67), and all indicated a willingness to repeat the measurement. Results of this study showed that the IMI technique is well tolerated and accepted by women participating in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study, suggesting that the technique shows promise in a research or clinical setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9043,"journal":{"name":"Bone Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187223000797/pdfft?md5=ce382801b3f6cefde8325f81ca01d850&pid=1-s2.0-S2352187223000797-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The practicality of using bone impact microindentation in a population-based study of women: A Geelong-Osteoporosis Study\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Rufus-Membere , Kara B. Anderson , Kara L. Holloway-Kew , Jacob W. Harland , Adolfo Diez-Perez , Mark A. Kotowicz , Julie A. Pasco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Impact microindentation (IMI) is a minimally invasive technique that allows the assessment of bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo, by measuring the depth of a micron-sized, spherical tip into cortical bone that is then indexed to the depth of the tip into a reference material. In this study, we aimed to assess the practicality of its application in 99 women aged 42-84 yr from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Impact microindentation was performed in the mid-shaft of the right tibia using the OsteoProbe. Immediately following measurement, each participant was requested to rate on a Visual Analogue Scale [0−10] the level of discomfort anticipated and experienced, any initial reluctance towards the measurement and whether they were willing to repeat the measurement. Of 99 potential participants who attended this assessment phase, 55 underwent IMI measurement. Reasons for non-measurement in 44 women were existing skin conditions (<em>n</em> = 8, 18.2 %) and excessive soft tissue around mid-tibial region (<em>n</em> = 32, 72.2 %). An additional four (9.1 %) participants did not provide any reasons for declining. For 55 participants who had underwent IMI, the expectation for pain when briefed about the procedure was low (2.28 ± 2.39), as was pain experienced during the measurement (0.72 ± 1.58). Participants were not reluctant to undergo the measurement (0.83 ± 1.67), and all indicated a willingness to repeat the measurement. Results of this study showed that the IMI technique is well tolerated and accepted by women participating in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study, suggesting that the technique shows promise in a research or clinical setting.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone Reports\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187223000797/pdfft?md5=ce382801b3f6cefde8325f81ca01d850&pid=1-s2.0-S2352187223000797-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187223000797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187223000797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
The practicality of using bone impact microindentation in a population-based study of women: A Geelong-Osteoporosis Study
Impact microindentation (IMI) is a minimally invasive technique that allows the assessment of bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo, by measuring the depth of a micron-sized, spherical tip into cortical bone that is then indexed to the depth of the tip into a reference material. In this study, we aimed to assess the practicality of its application in 99 women aged 42-84 yr from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Impact microindentation was performed in the mid-shaft of the right tibia using the OsteoProbe. Immediately following measurement, each participant was requested to rate on a Visual Analogue Scale [0−10] the level of discomfort anticipated and experienced, any initial reluctance towards the measurement and whether they were willing to repeat the measurement. Of 99 potential participants who attended this assessment phase, 55 underwent IMI measurement. Reasons for non-measurement in 44 women were existing skin conditions (n = 8, 18.2 %) and excessive soft tissue around mid-tibial region (n = 32, 72.2 %). An additional four (9.1 %) participants did not provide any reasons for declining. For 55 participants who had underwent IMI, the expectation for pain when briefed about the procedure was low (2.28 ± 2.39), as was pain experienced during the measurement (0.72 ± 1.58). Participants were not reluctant to undergo the measurement (0.83 ± 1.67), and all indicated a willingness to repeat the measurement. Results of this study showed that the IMI technique is well tolerated and accepted by women participating in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study, suggesting that the technique shows promise in a research or clinical setting.
Bone ReportsMedicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
Bone Reports is an interdisciplinary forum for the rapid publication of Original Research Articles and Case Reports across basic, translational and clinical aspects of bone and mineral metabolism. The journal publishes papers that are scientifically sound, with the peer review process focused principally on verifying sound methodologies, and correct data analysis and interpretation. We welcome studies either replicating or failing to replicate a previous study, and null findings. We fulfil a critical and current need to enhance research by publishing reproducibility studies and null findings.