{"title":"农产品金融化对粮食安全有影响吗?实证调查","authors":"Manogna R. L., Nishil Kulkarni","doi":"10.1016/j.bir.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The possible effect of the financialization of agricultural commodities on food security has become an evolving worry in recent years. This study seeks to empirically investigate this complicated problem and influence policy choices to ensure a more stable and secure food system by analyzing the role of financialization in global food markets. The study uses the panel data regression model, moderating effects model, and panel data regression with threshold variable to analyze financialization due to three agricultural commodities: wheat, maize, and soybean. For wheat, maize, and soybean futures traded on the Chicago Board of Trade, we utilize data related to annual trading volume, annual open interest contracts, and a ratio of annual trading volume to annual open interest contracts. The sample covers five developed countries - the United States, Australia, Canada, France, and Germany, and seven developing countries- China, Russia, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Vietnam, and Thailand. Annual panel data are constructed for the 2000–2021 period. The Human Development Index (HDI) is the threshold variable to differentiate the impact across these countries. The findings reveal that the financialization of agricultural commodities has negatively impacted food security globally, with wheat and soybean having a greater negative impact than corn. Also, there is a more considerable impact on developing countries compared to developed countries. The study finds that monetary policy can potentially reduce the impact of agricultural financialization on food security. The findings of this paper act as a guide to assist policymakers in ensuring that the world's food supply stays secure and available.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46690,"journal":{"name":"Borsa Istanbul Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000012/pdfft?md5=b64004cb7fe71601ee468521550c812c&pid=1-s2.0-S2214845024000012-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the financialization of agricultural commodities impact food security? An empirical investigation\",\"authors\":\"Manogna R. L., Nishil Kulkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bir.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The possible effect of the financialization of agricultural commodities on food security has become an evolving worry in recent years. This study seeks to empirically investigate this complicated problem and influence policy choices to ensure a more stable and secure food system by analyzing the role of financialization in global food markets. The study uses the panel data regression model, moderating effects model, and panel data regression with threshold variable to analyze financialization due to three agricultural commodities: wheat, maize, and soybean. For wheat, maize, and soybean futures traded on the Chicago Board of Trade, we utilize data related to annual trading volume, annual open interest contracts, and a ratio of annual trading volume to annual open interest contracts. The sample covers five developed countries - the United States, Australia, Canada, France, and Germany, and seven developing countries- China, Russia, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Vietnam, and Thailand. Annual panel data are constructed for the 2000–2021 period. The Human Development Index (HDI) is the threshold variable to differentiate the impact across these countries. The findings reveal that the financialization of agricultural commodities has negatively impacted food security globally, with wheat and soybean having a greater negative impact than corn. Also, there is a more considerable impact on developing countries compared to developed countries. The study finds that monetary policy can potentially reduce the impact of agricultural financialization on food security. The findings of this paper act as a guide to assist policymakers in ensuring that the world's food supply stays secure and available.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000012/pdfft?md5=b64004cb7fe71601ee468521550c812c&pid=1-s2.0-S2214845024000012-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borsa Istanbul Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does the financialization of agricultural commodities impact food security? An empirical investigation
The possible effect of the financialization of agricultural commodities on food security has become an evolving worry in recent years. This study seeks to empirically investigate this complicated problem and influence policy choices to ensure a more stable and secure food system by analyzing the role of financialization in global food markets. The study uses the panel data regression model, moderating effects model, and panel data regression with threshold variable to analyze financialization due to three agricultural commodities: wheat, maize, and soybean. For wheat, maize, and soybean futures traded on the Chicago Board of Trade, we utilize data related to annual trading volume, annual open interest contracts, and a ratio of annual trading volume to annual open interest contracts. The sample covers five developed countries - the United States, Australia, Canada, France, and Germany, and seven developing countries- China, Russia, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Vietnam, and Thailand. Annual panel data are constructed for the 2000–2021 period. The Human Development Index (HDI) is the threshold variable to differentiate the impact across these countries. The findings reveal that the financialization of agricultural commodities has negatively impacted food security globally, with wheat and soybean having a greater negative impact than corn. Also, there is a more considerable impact on developing countries compared to developed countries. The study finds that monetary policy can potentially reduce the impact of agricultural financialization on food security. The findings of this paper act as a guide to assist policymakers in ensuring that the world's food supply stays secure and available.
期刊介绍:
Peer Review under the responsibility of Borsa İstanbul Anonim Sirketi. Borsa İstanbul Review provides a scholarly platform for empirical financial studies including but not limited to financial markets and institutions, financial economics, investor behavior, financial centers and market structures, corporate finance, recent economic and financial trends. Micro and macro data applications and comparative studies are welcome. Country coverage includes advanced, emerging and developing economies. In particular, we would like to publish empirical papers with significant policy implications and encourage submissions in the following areas: Research Topics: • Investments and Portfolio Management • Behavioral Finance • Financial Markets and Institutions • Market Microstructure • Islamic Finance • Financial Risk Management • Valuation • Capital Markets Governance • Financial Regulations