农产品金融化对粮食安全有影响吗?实证调查

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Manogna R. L., Nishil Kulkarni
{"title":"农产品金融化对粮食安全有影响吗?实证调查","authors":"Manogna R. L.,&nbsp;Nishil Kulkarni","doi":"10.1016/j.bir.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The possible effect of the financialization of agricultural commodities on food security has become an evolving worry in recent years. This study seeks to empirically investigate this complicated problem and influence policy choices to ensure a more stable and secure food system by analyzing the role of financialization in global food markets. The study uses the panel data regression model, moderating effects model, and panel data regression with threshold variable to analyze financialization due to three agricultural commodities: wheat, maize, and soybean. For wheat, maize, and soybean futures traded on the Chicago Board of Trade, we utilize data related to annual trading volume, annual open interest contracts, and a ratio of annual trading volume to annual open interest contracts. The sample covers five developed countries - the United States, Australia, Canada, France, and Germany, and seven developing countries- China, Russia, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Vietnam, and Thailand. Annual panel data are constructed for the 2000–2021 period. The Human Development Index (HDI) is the threshold variable to differentiate the impact across these countries. The findings reveal that the financialization of agricultural commodities has negatively impacted food security globally, with wheat and soybean having a greater negative impact than corn. Also, there is a more considerable impact on developing countries compared to developed countries. The study finds that monetary policy can potentially reduce the impact of agricultural financialization on food security. The findings of this paper act as a guide to assist policymakers in ensuring that the world's food supply stays secure and available.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46690,"journal":{"name":"Borsa Istanbul Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000012/pdfft?md5=b64004cb7fe71601ee468521550c812c&pid=1-s2.0-S2214845024000012-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the financialization of agricultural commodities impact food security? An empirical investigation\",\"authors\":\"Manogna R. L.,&nbsp;Nishil Kulkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bir.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The possible effect of the financialization of agricultural commodities on food security has become an evolving worry in recent years. This study seeks to empirically investigate this complicated problem and influence policy choices to ensure a more stable and secure food system by analyzing the role of financialization in global food markets. The study uses the panel data regression model, moderating effects model, and panel data regression with threshold variable to analyze financialization due to three agricultural commodities: wheat, maize, and soybean. For wheat, maize, and soybean futures traded on the Chicago Board of Trade, we utilize data related to annual trading volume, annual open interest contracts, and a ratio of annual trading volume to annual open interest contracts. The sample covers five developed countries - the United States, Australia, Canada, France, and Germany, and seven developing countries- China, Russia, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Vietnam, and Thailand. Annual panel data are constructed for the 2000–2021 period. The Human Development Index (HDI) is the threshold variable to differentiate the impact across these countries. The findings reveal that the financialization of agricultural commodities has negatively impacted food security globally, with wheat and soybean having a greater negative impact than corn. Also, there is a more considerable impact on developing countries compared to developed countries. The study finds that monetary policy can potentially reduce the impact of agricultural financialization on food security. The findings of this paper act as a guide to assist policymakers in ensuring that the world's food supply stays secure and available.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000012/pdfft?md5=b64004cb7fe71601ee468521550c812c&pid=1-s2.0-S2214845024000012-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borsa Istanbul Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024000012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,农产品金融化对粮食安全可能产生的影响已成为一个不断演变的担忧。本研究试图通过分析金融化在全球粮食市场中的作用,对这一复杂问题进行实证研究,并影响政策选择,以确保粮食系统更加稳定和安全。本研究采用面板数据回归模型、调节效应模型和带阈值变量的面板数据回归模型,对小麦、玉米和大豆三种农产品的金融化进行分析。对于在芝加哥期货交易所交易的小麦、玉米和大豆期货,我们利用了与年度交易量、年度未平仓合约以及年度交易量与年度未平仓合约比率相关的数据。样本涵盖五个发达国家--美国、澳大利亚、加拿大、法国和德国,以及七个发展中国家--中国、俄罗斯、印度、印度尼西亚、巴西、越南和泰国。年度面板数据的时间跨度为 2000-2021 年。人类发展指数(HDI)是区分这些国家之间影响的临界变量。研究结果表明,农产品金融化对全球粮食安全产生了负面影响,其中小麦和大豆的负面影响大于玉米。此外,与发达国家相比,发展中国家受到的影响更大。研究发现,货币政策有可能减少农业金融化对粮食安全的影响。本文的研究结果可作为指南,帮助决策者确保世界粮食供应的安全和可获得性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the financialization of agricultural commodities impact food security? An empirical investigation

The possible effect of the financialization of agricultural commodities on food security has become an evolving worry in recent years. This study seeks to empirically investigate this complicated problem and influence policy choices to ensure a more stable and secure food system by analyzing the role of financialization in global food markets. The study uses the panel data regression model, moderating effects model, and panel data regression with threshold variable to analyze financialization due to three agricultural commodities: wheat, maize, and soybean. For wheat, maize, and soybean futures traded on the Chicago Board of Trade, we utilize data related to annual trading volume, annual open interest contracts, and a ratio of annual trading volume to annual open interest contracts. The sample covers five developed countries - the United States, Australia, Canada, France, and Germany, and seven developing countries- China, Russia, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Vietnam, and Thailand. Annual panel data are constructed for the 2000–2021 period. The Human Development Index (HDI) is the threshold variable to differentiate the impact across these countries. The findings reveal that the financialization of agricultural commodities has negatively impacted food security globally, with wheat and soybean having a greater negative impact than corn. Also, there is a more considerable impact on developing countries compared to developed countries. The study finds that monetary policy can potentially reduce the impact of agricultural financialization on food security. The findings of this paper act as a guide to assist policymakers in ensuring that the world's food supply stays secure and available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
130
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Borsa İstanbul Anonim Sirketi. Borsa İstanbul Review provides a scholarly platform for empirical financial studies including but not limited to financial markets and institutions, financial economics, investor behavior, financial centers and market structures, corporate finance, recent economic and financial trends. Micro and macro data applications and comparative studies are welcome. Country coverage includes advanced, emerging and developing economies. In particular, we would like to publish empirical papers with significant policy implications and encourage submissions in the following areas: Research Topics: • Investments and Portfolio Management • Behavioral Finance • Financial Markets and Institutions • Market Microstructure • Islamic Finance • Financial Risk Management • Valuation • Capital Markets Governance • Financial Regulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信