超越棉花和聚酯:评估未来时装业的新兴原料和转化方法

IF 20.2 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD
Ryen M. Frazier , Keren A. Vivas , Ivana Azuaje , Ramon Vera , Alonzo Pifano , Naycari Forfora , Hasan Jameel , Ericka Ford , Joel J. Pawlak , Richard Venditti , Ronalds Gonzalez
{"title":"超越棉花和聚酯:评估未来时装业的新兴原料和转化方法","authors":"Ryen M. Frazier ,&nbsp;Keren A. Vivas ,&nbsp;Ivana Azuaje ,&nbsp;Ramon Vera ,&nbsp;Alonzo Pifano ,&nbsp;Naycari Forfora ,&nbsp;Hasan Jameel ,&nbsp;Ericka Ford ,&nbsp;Joel J. Pawlak ,&nbsp;Richard Venditti ,&nbsp;Ronalds Gonzalez","doi":"10.1016/j.jobab.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As the global population grows, the demand for textiles is increasing rapidly. However, this puts immense pressure on manufacturers to produce more fiber. While synthetic fibers can be produced cheaply, they have a negative impact on the environment. On the other hand, fibers from wool, sisal, fique, wood pulp (viscose), and man-made cellulose fibers (MMCFs) from cotton cannot alone meet the growing fiber demand without major stresses on land, water, and existing markets using these materials. With a greater emphasis on transparency and circular economy practices, there is a need to consider natural non-wood alternative sources for MMCFs to supplement other fiber types. However, introducing new feedstocks with different compositions may require different biomass conversion methods. Therefore, based on existing work, this review addresses the technical feasibility of various alternative feedstocks for conversion to textile-grade fibers. First, alternative feedstocks are introduced, and then conventional (dissolving pulp) and emerging (fibrillated cellulose and recycled material) conversion technologies are evaluated to help select the most suitable and promising processes for these emerging alternative sources of cellulose. It is important to note that for alternative feedstocks to be adopted on a meaningful scale, high biomass availability and proximity of conversion facilities are critical factors. In North America, soybean, wheat, rice, sorghum, and sugarcane residues are widely available and most suitable for conventional conversion through various dissolving pulp production methods (pre-hydrolysis kraft, acid sulfite, soda, SO<sub>2</sub>-ethanol-water, and potassium hydroxide) or by emerging cellulose fibrillation methods. While dissolving pulp conversion is well-established, fibrillated cellulose methods could be beneficial from cost, efficiency, and environmental perspectives. Thus, the authors strongly encourage more work in this growing research area. However, conducting thorough cost and sustainability assessments is important to determine the best feedstock and technology combinations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S236996982400001X/pdfft?md5=e0e2def54c2eca7e64bb6eb9918633e5&pid=1-s2.0-S236996982400001X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond cotton and polyester: An evaluation of emerging feedstocks and conversion methods for the future of fashion industry\",\"authors\":\"Ryen M. Frazier ,&nbsp;Keren A. Vivas ,&nbsp;Ivana Azuaje ,&nbsp;Ramon Vera ,&nbsp;Alonzo Pifano ,&nbsp;Naycari Forfora ,&nbsp;Hasan Jameel ,&nbsp;Ericka Ford ,&nbsp;Joel J. Pawlak ,&nbsp;Richard Venditti ,&nbsp;Ronalds Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobab.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As the global population grows, the demand for textiles is increasing rapidly. However, this puts immense pressure on manufacturers to produce more fiber. While synthetic fibers can be produced cheaply, they have a negative impact on the environment. On the other hand, fibers from wool, sisal, fique, wood pulp (viscose), and man-made cellulose fibers (MMCFs) from cotton cannot alone meet the growing fiber demand without major stresses on land, water, and existing markets using these materials. With a greater emphasis on transparency and circular economy practices, there is a need to consider natural non-wood alternative sources for MMCFs to supplement other fiber types. However, introducing new feedstocks with different compositions may require different biomass conversion methods. Therefore, based on existing work, this review addresses the technical feasibility of various alternative feedstocks for conversion to textile-grade fibers. First, alternative feedstocks are introduced, and then conventional (dissolving pulp) and emerging (fibrillated cellulose and recycled material) conversion technologies are evaluated to help select the most suitable and promising processes for these emerging alternative sources of cellulose. It is important to note that for alternative feedstocks to be adopted on a meaningful scale, high biomass availability and proximity of conversion facilities are critical factors. In North America, soybean, wheat, rice, sorghum, and sugarcane residues are widely available and most suitable for conventional conversion through various dissolving pulp production methods (pre-hydrolysis kraft, acid sulfite, soda, SO<sub>2</sub>-ethanol-water, and potassium hydroxide) or by emerging cellulose fibrillation methods. While dissolving pulp conversion is well-established, fibrillated cellulose methods could be beneficial from cost, efficiency, and environmental perspectives. Thus, the authors strongly encourage more work in this growing research area. However, conducting thorough cost and sustainability assessments is important to determine the best feedstock and technology combinations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S236996982400001X/pdfft?md5=e0e2def54c2eca7e64bb6eb9918633e5&pid=1-s2.0-S236996982400001X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S236996982400001X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S236996982400001X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球人口的增长,对纺织品的需求也在迅速增加。然而,这给制造商带来了生产更多纤维的巨大压力。合成纤维虽然生产成本低廉,但对环境有负面影响。另一方面,如果不对土地、水和使用这些材料的现有市场造成重大压力,仅靠羊毛、剑麻、fique、木浆(粘胶)和棉花的人造纤维素纤维(MMCFs)是无法满足日益增长的纤维需求的。随着对透明度和循环经济实践的日益重视,有必要考虑天然非木材替代来源的人造纤维素纤维,以补充其他类型的纤维。然而,引入不同成分的新原料可能需要不同的生物质转化方法。因此,在现有工作的基础上,本综述探讨了各种替代原料转化为纺织级纤维的技术可行性。首先介绍替代原料,然后评估传统(溶解浆)和新兴(纤维化纤维素和回收材料)转化技术,以帮助为这些新兴纤维素替代来源选择最合适、最有前景的工艺。值得注意的是,要想大规模采用替代原料,生物质的高可用性和转化设施的就近性是关键因素。在北美,大豆、小麦、大米、高粱和甘蔗残渣可广泛获得,最适合通过各种溶解浆生产方法(预水解牛皮纸、酸性亚硫酸盐、苏打、二氧化硫-乙醇-水和氢氧化钾)或新兴的纤维素纤维化方法进行传统转化。虽然溶解浆转化技术已经成熟,但纤维素纤维化方法从成本、效率和环境角度来看都是有益的。因此,作者强烈鼓励在这一不断发展的研究领域开展更多工作。不过,进行全面的成本和可持续性评估对于确定最佳原料和技术组合非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond cotton and polyester: An evaluation of emerging feedstocks and conversion methods for the future of fashion industry

As the global population grows, the demand for textiles is increasing rapidly. However, this puts immense pressure on manufacturers to produce more fiber. While synthetic fibers can be produced cheaply, they have a negative impact on the environment. On the other hand, fibers from wool, sisal, fique, wood pulp (viscose), and man-made cellulose fibers (MMCFs) from cotton cannot alone meet the growing fiber demand without major stresses on land, water, and existing markets using these materials. With a greater emphasis on transparency and circular economy practices, there is a need to consider natural non-wood alternative sources for MMCFs to supplement other fiber types. However, introducing new feedstocks with different compositions may require different biomass conversion methods. Therefore, based on existing work, this review addresses the technical feasibility of various alternative feedstocks for conversion to textile-grade fibers. First, alternative feedstocks are introduced, and then conventional (dissolving pulp) and emerging (fibrillated cellulose and recycled material) conversion technologies are evaluated to help select the most suitable and promising processes for these emerging alternative sources of cellulose. It is important to note that for alternative feedstocks to be adopted on a meaningful scale, high biomass availability and proximity of conversion facilities are critical factors. In North America, soybean, wheat, rice, sorghum, and sugarcane residues are widely available and most suitable for conventional conversion through various dissolving pulp production methods (pre-hydrolysis kraft, acid sulfite, soda, SO2-ethanol-water, and potassium hydroxide) or by emerging cellulose fibrillation methods. While dissolving pulp conversion is well-established, fibrillated cellulose methods could be beneficial from cost, efficiency, and environmental perspectives. Thus, the authors strongly encourage more work in this growing research area. However, conducting thorough cost and sustainability assessments is important to determine the best feedstock and technology combinations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts
Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信